Folks, please understand what “conference” means in the context of SCOTUS. “Conference” means a bunch of law clerks sitting around a table piled sky high with appeals to SCOTUS. Hundreds, literally hundreds sitting on that table. They are the ones that made it to the first cut. Somewhere in there is Orly’s case. Now the law clerks start the process of culling. AT BEST, may be 10 or so get accepted where they will actually “go to trial”. The rest? Rejected. She’s been rejected before and you can count on them to do it again.
The judiciary will only cooperate if there are huge, loud, ugly crowds outside their doors demanding justice.
However, I would counsel to anyone reading this, we can still make the effort to pressure SCOTUS to hear her case. Letters, email, twitter, facebook, youtube videos, faxes to SCOTUS, Congress, even the White House as well as other parties. Aggressive, sustained and in your face. We have been polite for nearly 5 years. Time’s up.
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State