If the Republican party still existed this putz would have never been elected much less elected to a 2nd term. Instead what we got is statists on both sides helping an admitted foreign born national destroy this country.
Isaac says my comment is "Right on!"
posted on 01/10/2013 7:08:39 AM PST
(Someday our schools we will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
It should be “FEWER” guns, not less guns.
posted on 01/10/2013 7:46:04 AM PST
(According to mudslimz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
obozo’s agenda is the same as the elitist one worlders: divide the people socially, disarm all citizens, elevate the cost of food, water, fuel and all other resources necessary for survival, slowly regulate freedom and liberty out of existence in order to condition the people to subjugation, in any way possible invoke strife, discontent and hunger until the people turn on one another for daily survival, use the US military to remove any dictator that is contrary to the New World Order agenda, deplete the world’s human population.
posted on 01/10/2013 7:54:37 AM PST
Why would Obama hire women? Bammy likes da boys...
Imagine the Presidential Spa parties!
posted on 01/10/2013 8:14:17 AM PST
by American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
I would absolutely love it if some pressie would produce a binder of possible female appointments and present it to him at his next press encounter.
Obie's response would be worth the price of admission.
posted on 01/10/2013 8:17:50 AM PST
by gov_bean_ counter
(Hope and Change has become Attack and Obfuscate.)
Well as strange as it may seem, on the gun control issue, I think we stand a better chance in congress with Obama in the White house than we would have with Romney. Let's face it, Romney was gun grabber who signed the Massachusetts Assault Weapons Ban. If he was in office, or getting ready to take office, he would have already folded like a wet newspaper and would be pushing gun control as hard as Obama. The difference is, a significant number of “party first” Republicans would be at least giving him tepid support on the issue because he is the leader of the party. With Obama the party stands a much better chance of holding firm in their opposition.
posted on 01/10/2013 8:25:26 AM PST
Muslims would not allow women to be in positions of authority or high visibility, is this true?
posted on 01/10/2013 9:20:49 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson