Obama's 2013 Agenda: No Women, Less Guns, More Taxes

Pundit Press ^ | 1/10/13 | Aurelius

[therightliveswithus]

With 2013 just underway, Barack Obama's agenda for the coming year is readily apparent. Though Mr. Obama promised many foolish things during his campaign in 2012, the lies he has told are the ones making the headlines thus far this year.

His agenda for the coming year? No women, less guns, and more taxes on the middle class, or "lies, lies, and more lies"...

First is the fact that the President, despite attacking Mitt Romney repeatedly for being "anti-woman," has thus far refused to nominate any women to his cabinet in his second term. This has been met with largely silence from liberals, who blindly took in the President's repeated misogynistic ads depicting women as either feeble-minded and promiscuous, or utterly dependent on the government.

Thus, ironically to those on the Left, completely expected from those on the Right, Mr. Obama's huffing and puffing over 'respecting women more than Republicans' was a crass power play to receive votes. Unfortunately, it worked.

Second, President Obama is looking into much stronger gun laws for our nation. His proposals thus far include: everyone having a background check to own any firearm, a stiffening of penalties for improperly using a weapon, and a nationwide database to track the movement and sale of every single weapon in the United States...

To add insult to injury to President Obama's hypocrisy, this flies directly into the face of his previous statement that, "I am not going to take your guns away... That just ain't true. That just ain't true!" Caulk up another lie.

Third, the President promised that there would be no increase on taxes for the middle class. He promised that only the "rich" would pay more. Yet, once again, the President has lied. And again, conservatives saw it coming, liberals have been caught off guard.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

If the Republican party still existed this putz would have never been elected much less elected to a 2nd term. Instead what we got is statists on both sides helping an admitted foreign born national destroy this country.

Isaac says my comment is "Right on!"

[ConradofMontferrat]

Grammarnazi here:

It should be “FEWER” guns, not less guns.

[drypowder]

obozo’s agenda is the same as the elitist one worlders: divide the people socially, disarm all citizens, elevate the cost of food, water, fuel and all other resources necessary for survival, slowly regulate freedom and liberty out of existence in order to condition the people to subjugation, in any way possible invoke strife, discontent and hunger until the people turn on one another for daily survival, use the US military to remove any dictator that is contrary to the New World Order agenda, deplete the world’s human population.

[American in Israel]

Why would Obama hire women? Bammy likes da boys...

Imagine the Presidential Spa parties!

[gov_bean_ counter]

I would absolutely love it if some pressie would produce a binder of possible female appointments and present it to him at his next press encounter.

Obie's response would be worth the price of admission.

[gov_bean_ counter]

You beat mt to it... :)

[apillar]

Well as strange as it may seem, on the gun control issue, I think we stand a better chance in congress with Obama in the White house than we would have with Romney. Let's face it, Romney was gun grabber who signed the Massachusetts Assault Weapons Ban. If he was in office, or getting ready to take office, he would have already folded like a wet newspaper and would be pushing gun control as hard as Obama. The difference is, a significant number of “party first” Republicans would be at least giving him tepid support on the issue because he is the leader of the party. With Obama the party stands a much better chance of holding firm in their opposition.

[NEMDF]

Muslims would not allow women to be in positions of authority or high visibility, is this true?