Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin In 2016? Conservative Columnist Says ‘Yes Please’
The Inquisitr ^ | November 19 2012 | (unattributed)

Posted on 11/19/2012 7:06:51 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network

Should Sarah Palin run for president in 2016? Conservative columnist Charlotte Allen thinks so, arguing that the former Alaskan governor is just what the GOP needs to revitalize its campaign chances in 2016.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/404803/sarah-palin-in-2016-conservative-columnist-says-yes-please/#WsxLVCVOOZTMQYGW.99

(Excerpt) Read more at inquisitr.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: palin; palin2016; pds; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: stormer

I think if she would have run, she would have beat Romney and would be President right now.

That is what I think.


21 posted on 11/19/2012 7:34:01 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stormer

That may be but only because idiots like you believe what they read, or maybe hear for you, on MSDNC.


22 posted on 11/19/2012 7:36:34 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

(correction: President-elect)


23 posted on 11/19/2012 7:36:56 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I would rather lose w Palin than “Win” w the clowns in the GOPe who now offer obama-lite


24 posted on 11/19/2012 7:40:02 PM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

It doesn’t matter who I would support. There isn’t a Republican who could win a national election.


25 posted on 11/19/2012 7:40:37 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
I think the GOP-E out right told her that if she ran and won the Nomination they would not support her.

Now typically this is fine, GFY GOP-E, BUT being the Patriot that she is. Sarah didn't want to risk some sort of splinter GOP-E third party rebellion and get Hussein back in the White Hut.

So, their still being an acceptable number of alternatives to Romney she decided to sit this one out. (But Mittens still wound up with the Nomination and look where we are now)

But Sarah knows all this isn't about her, this is bigger than me, you, or her wanting to be president.

That being the Chief Executive is a Responsibility and a Privilege, not an end unto itself, the way Ubama and I would bet Romney sees it.

That is what makes Sarah so special, to be honest I don't think she wants to be President per say, she just wants a Conservative in the white house and if it ends up being her, well so be it.

26 posted on 11/19/2012 7:41:12 PM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stormer

So float someone then.

No fair just taking pokes at others. Who would you support right now?


27 posted on 11/19/2012 7:41:56 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stormer
So what are you saying?

We must become more like the Democrats?

28 posted on 11/19/2012 7:42:37 PM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

And if we believe this idiocy, we are doomed to extinction as a Party and movement.


29 posted on 11/19/2012 7:46:06 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Based on what? Your feelings? Her negatives are so high, if Palin had been the Republican nominee her loss would have been epic.


30 posted on 11/19/2012 7:46:12 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

She is done with politics.


31 posted on 11/19/2012 7:47:39 PM PST by Randy Larsen (Aim small, Miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stormer

I agree. I love her, but she is entirely unelectable and sure will be by 2016.


32 posted on 11/19/2012 7:47:39 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stormer

33 posted on 11/19/2012 7:48:49 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

There IS something to be said for that. We are going to perpetually lose with what the GOP elite and their mouthpieces give us, why not go with one of our own win or lose?


34 posted on 11/19/2012 7:49:44 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
And if we believe this idiocy, we are doomed to extinction as a Party and movement.

It's mortifying. These loons are making the rest of us here -- on a site Jim has spent over a decade establishing as sober and credible -- look like the political equivalent of tinfoil-topped 9/11 truthers.


35 posted on 11/19/2012 7:53:06 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Maybe one for your Ping List.

:)


36 posted on 11/19/2012 7:53:06 PM PST by Clyde5445
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Agreed. The ghost of Goldwater is always w these clowns in the GOPe, but you know what - 50 years from now people will respect and quote Goldwater - not dole, W, GHWB, etc right?


37 posted on 11/19/2012 7:53:59 PM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Why don't you post a more current picture of your love interest. Does this look like someone who could be the leader of the free world?


38 posted on 11/19/2012 7:53:59 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

I think we need to get away from a “cult of personality” type of division politics.


39 posted on 11/19/2012 7:54:07 PM PST by MDspinboyredux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: stormer
Seriously now, negatives mean nothing ~ all that counts is that you get your base out.

Romney forgot about that part ~

40 posted on 11/19/2012 7:54:17 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson