Posted on 11/17/2012 10:16:52 AM PST by DeprogramLiberalism
Congressional committees and hearings are not necessary to prove without doubt that the administration deliberately lied when it attributed the Benghazi consulate attack solely to demonstrators. A simple Google search for September 11-12 brings up dozens of media reports indicating that at the very least an organized attack took advantage of a possible demonstration as cover (we now know there was no demonstration). Experts from around the world were quoted as insisting that the attack was organized, with many naming names. Furthermore, evidence of an organized attack is multitudinous in these reports. For the administration to have claimed it had no information that indicated that organized terrorists might have been involved is to assert that the administration doesn’t read the media. Not even the Drudge Report, apparently. At 7:00 AM ET on September 12 Drudge had a main headline and link to a Reuters report that contained:
~U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved. ... They also said some reporting from the region suggested that members of Al-Qaeda's north Africa-based affiliate, known as Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.~
For the Obama administration to adamantly insist for weeks afterwards that the Benghazi consulate attack was solely the result of a spontaneous demonstration can only be a result of a deliberate plan of propaganda to lie to the American people. Obama played stupid and expected his sycophantic press to play stupid as well and cover for him. Of course, they did, but not until after they got their talking points from the administration, which was a couple of days late. By then they had already let the cat out of the bag...
Sorry. I’m not seeing the significance of this. I have already posted links suggesting it might have instead been a detention center or arms cache. What matters is why Americans were unnecessarily left to die - whatever the compound was and whatever it was called.
Thank you. All we can do is keep making a stink about it I guess. I’m open to suggestions from anyone on how to put a fire under their butts.
Well its pretty simple,they did not provide security or come to the aid of these people because Obama does not want the American People to know he is arming Islamic Jihadists that had been Previously Killing our troops,Arming them with weapons from Kadafis arsenal and sending them to Syria to oust Assad. If you cant Understand That I cant Help you
Well its pretty simple,they did not provide security or come to the aid of these people because Obama does not want the American People to know he is arming Islamic Jihadists that had been Previously Killing our troops,Arming them with weapons from Kadafis arsenal and sending them to Syria to oust Assad. If you cant Understand That I cant Help you
What's with the 'tude? It is completely unnecessary.
Well its pretty simple,they did not provide security or come to the aid of these people because Obama does not want the American People to know he is arming Islamic Jihadists that had been Previously Killing our troops,Arming them with weapons from Kadafis arsenal and sending them to Syria to oust Assad.
I find that rather convoluted, not "pretty simple". I am not saying you are not correct, only that I haven't followed the dots to that conclusion. Frankly, I am not sure what to conclude.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.