Easy to Prove the Administration Lied about Benghazi Attack

Deprogramming Liberalism ^ | November 17/12 | Jim Autio

[DeprogramLiberalism]

Congressional committees and hearings are not necessary to prove without doubt that the administration deliberately lied when it attributed the Benghazi consulate attack solely to demonstrators. A simple Google search for September 11-12 brings up dozens of media reports indicating that at the very least an organized attack took advantage of a possible demonstration as cover (we now know there was no demonstration). Experts from around the world were quoted as insisting that the attack was organized, with many naming names. Furthermore, evidence of an organized attack is multitudinous in these reports. For the administration to have claimed it had no information that indicated that organized terrorists might have been involved is to assert that the administration doesn’t read the media. Not even the Drudge Report, apparently. At 7:00 AM ET on September 12 Drudge had a main headline and link to a Reuters report that contained:

~U.S. government officials said the Benghazi attack may have been planned in advance and there were indications that members of a militant faction calling itself Ansar al Sharia - which translates as Supporters of Islamic Law - may have been involved. ... They also said some reporting from the region suggested that members of Al-Qaeda's north Africa-based affiliate, known as Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, may have been involved.~

For the Obama administration to adamantly insist for weeks afterwards that the Benghazi consulate attack was solely the result of a spontaneous demonstration can only be a result of a deliberate plan of propaganda to lie to the American people. Obama played stupid and expected his sycophantic press to play stupid as well and cover for him. Of course, they did, but not until after they got their talking points from the administration, which was a couple of days late. By then they had already let the cat out of the bag...

[what's up]

That is exactly what you are suppose to think given the reporting. There is nothing Christian about him.

He's a copt who wanted to make an anti-Islam film.

[Just mythoughts]

He's a copt who wanted to make an anti-Islam film.

Do yourself a favor and do some homework on who this fake film maker really is. He is not a copt or a Jew as he claimed.

[what's up]

I have done some homework.

Although he's not what you might call an upstanding member of society, a large number of sources (including his Wikipedia bio) identify him as a Copt.

He wanted to make an anti-Muslim film. He's in jail on unrelated charges.

[Just mythoughts]

Why yes it is like an orchestrated concert, singing Sam the man Bacile is a Coptic Christian except for this guy.

http://shoebat.com/2012/09/27/innocence-of-muslims-film-was-made-by-terrorists-2/

[what's up]

I understand there is an alternative story.

[upchuck]

I have maintained since day one of this, and will continue to maintain until I’m proved wrong, that the whole Benghazi debacle was a coverup for something much, much larger and way more sinister. A blown coverup perhaps, but a coverup nontheless.

[FreeReign]

Anybody can put up a website. The one you refer to is called shoebat.com. It’s a site that was created to send out a message whether it be false or true, about Shoebat.

[Just mythoughts]

Of course ‘anybody’ can put up a website. But when a lie can be proved from the top, it does not mean every body is required to believe the lie or ignore it.

I just happen to find shoebat more believable that what the rest of the chorus is singing as it makes NO sense that a Coptic Christian would be besmirching other Christians claiming to be a Jew.

[blueunicorn6]

Look at the three part story on The Chicago Connection at illinoispaytoplay.com. I had the wrong site on that, before. Look at Aaron Klein’s reporting at WND. Look up THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP. See who is on their board. Look up the phrase RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT. Obama and Soros and buddies are using the name of the UN to conduct war in the Middle East. They are using our (American taxpayer) money, personnel, equipment and facilities to put money in their pockets. Do you think it’s a coincidence that Kelley’s sister was married to the guy responsible for handing out the cash and favors in postwar Iraq? Too many coincidences here.
The coverup at Benghazi isn’t just about the Obama administration’s incompetence. The coverup is trying to hide the reason why Obama has been using war to change governments in Libya and Syria.

[blueunicorn6]

And, lest we forget, the Clintons are involved in this right up to their eyeballs.

[little jeremiah]

“Film maker” is in jail for violated terms of parole (or is it probation? I always get the terms mixed), he was not supposed to use a computer.

He’s a business partner of Walid Shoebat’s cousin who is a Palistinian Muz jihadi.

The whole thing stinks. The admin. wants the “film maker” away from anyone who can ask him questions.

[TigersEye]

One of the excuses that pubbie congresscritters are buying is that the riots in Cairo were because of the video. Don't let that BS stand either. They weren't.

Brian Lilley: The MSM is lying about the muslim riots video 12:01

[little jeremiah]

Thanks for more details and links.

Coptic Christian my ***....

[TigersEye]

His so called film was done for the sole purpose of besmirching Jews and Christians of which he is neither.

He didn't do that.

Proof Positive - In My Opinion (who created Innocence of Muslims)(Obama)

• Nakoula is a FedMob snitch.
• Nakoula's partner in the film was Eiad Salameh, a Palestinian Muslim.
• AFAIK Nakoula was never a film maker before. He was a check kiter.
• The film was not originally about Mohammed.
• Clips from the film were first aired on Egyptian TV just 3-4 days before Sept. 11th by a hardline 'tele-Islamist.'
• 0bama, Hillary and Rice have repeatedly made a point of saying that the U.S. gov had "nothing to do with the film." Something no one in the world would have ever thought.
• 0bama and Hillary have engaged in a major campaign of disinformation to blame the film and apologize for it.

There were four versions of Nakoula's movie.

• 1)Desert Warrior
• 2)Innocence of bin Laden
• 3)The Real Life of Muhammad
• 4)Innocence of Muslims.

Only the final one was forwarded, by persons unknown, to Sheikh Khalid Abdullah the cleric in Cairo who aired it on TV. Nakoula, the maker of the original film, was not the one who uploaded the final version, Innocence of Muslims, to the internet.

You can hear some interesting things about the timeline of all these iterations of "the movie" in the Youtube video linked below. Start at 9:30 and watch to 16:00 for the meat of that.

False Flag, Currently Underway ?

Even the protests and attack in Cairo weren't about that stupid 'video.'

Brian Lilley: The MSM is lying about the muslim riots
Interviews on the streets of Cairo. 'Video' had nothing to do with protests and attack.

[DeprogramLiberalism]

There's always the secret CIA prison angel: Google search

[DeprogramLiberalism]

And then I just found this: Benghazi Betrayal May be a Cover-Up of American Weapons in Hands of Terrorists

[TigersEye]

The "Innocence of Muslims," the film blamed for provoking the violence, was the work of a California-based Israeli filmmaker Sam Bacile, according to a report by the Associated Press.

The only source there is "a report by the Associated Press." There is no interview and no person cited as a source. It goes on to tell what is now known to be an outright fabrication...

It portrays Mohammad as a fool, a philanderer and a religious fake and in one clip posted on YouTube, he was shown in an apparent sexual act with a woman. For many Muslims it is blasphemous even to show a depiction of the Prophet.

That wasn't the script that Nakoula filmed as the actors themselves have said. The first version of the film was not about Mohammed at all. Not one word about him.

[little jeremiah]

Placemark for fake film info eompendium.

[AndyJackson]

Who said “stand down”?

Funny with all our fascination withe sex and betrayal, we have completely lost sight of the real question in all of this.

[ballplayer]

IT WAS NOT A CONSULATE! It was A Diplomatic Facility,whatever the Hell that is, What is the Government definition of a Diplomatic Facility?