Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ayn Rand Saw Obama's Sort Coming Down the Pike
Reaganite Republican ^ | 09 November 2012 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 11/09/2012 2:41:54 AM PST by Reaganite Republican

" Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper’s bell of an approaching looter. 

The man who lets a leader prescribe his course is a wreck being towed to the scrap heap. 

It only stands to reason that where there’s sacrifice, there’s someone collecting the sacrificial offerings. Where there’s service, there is someone being served. The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master

A government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims. 

Do not ever say that the desire to “do good” by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. 

Government “help” to business is just as disastrous as government persecution… the only way a government can be of service to national prosperity is by keeping its hands off. 

I swear, by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine. 

Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities -and the smallest minority on earth is the individual.

Let me give you a tip on a clue to men's characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.

The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws 

The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die, but to enjoy yourself- and live

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see.

Freedom (n.): To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing.

You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.

The question isn’t 'who is going to let me'; it’s 
'who is going to stop me?' "


___________________________________________________________
Ayn Rand quotes
Ayn Rand Institute   Litverse   OverthinkingIt   Wikipedia  Goodreads


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: any; galt; quotes; rand

1 posted on 11/09/2012 2:41:59 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdvisorB; sten; ken5050

*** PING ***


2 posted on 11/09/2012 2:43:38 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.


3 posted on 11/09/2012 3:07:12 AM PST by Twinkie (OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE A MANDATE!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
So did Rudyard Kipling.
4 posted on 11/09/2012 3:40:14 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Actually Ayn Rand was not all that prescient, the novel “Atlas Shrugged” was written against the backdrop of Great Depression I. There are so many similarties between the period 1931-1937, and the period 2007 and what will be the situation in 2013, that the eerie feeling of deja vu cannot be shaken off. George W. Bush as Herbert Hoover, and Bronco Bama as FDR, each working with Democrat majorities in the legislative branch, took what was a mere economic downturn that would have self-corrected without government intervention, and turned it into an orgy of eating the seed corn while sowing salt into the soil.

We have been in “Great Depression II” for some time now, and only the fudged numbers and the application of a phony “safety net” has disguised the true extent of the number. In 1933, FDR struck down gold ownership as a hedge against inflationary forces, first by prohibiting individual ownership of gold except under very restricted circumstances, then by devaluating the dollar by setting the price of gold at $32 per ounce, from its previous level of $20 per ounce. While these numbers seem to be quaintly low and proportionately not nearly as great as the recent run-up in gold prices, this did signify a highly inflationary move when the whole world was in a state of contraction, effectively causing an artificial increase in prices, which APPEARS to be the return of prosperity.

Today, with neither gold nor silver as a standard, the printing presses are in the business of converting perfectly good and valuable paper into “green stamps” of dubious and declining value. For a while, this has propped up prices and provided the illusion of prosperity, but it is all a shell, and assets purchased today on credit, with very low interest rates, are paid off with these individually much less valuable dollars tomorrow. But because the rate of inflation is MORE than the interest paid on these credit transactions, this amounts to a NEGATIVE return for the lender.

Lending as an enterprise shrinks back to near nothing, because it no longer pays back as much as simply buying commodities and holding them until the price rises to reflect the excess number of dollars in circulation.

This disincentive to make money available for lending, has a triple whammy effect. First, businesses no longer have a reliable source of new funds for expansion, The price of EVERYTHING goes up, while the real purchasing power of the weekly paycheck declines, both because the value of the compensation is being lost, and also because the actual size in numerical terms, is less and less, through shortened hours, and by no adjustments (or very little) made to the base pay, even as the adjustments are cancelled out by increases in such things as purchase of health insurance.

And now, there is the spectre of rising taxes, in some instances, sharply higher, as the “old” tax rates from the Clinton kick in.


5 posted on 11/09/2012 3:55:18 AM PST by alloysteel (Bronco Bama - the cowboy who whooped up and widened the stampede.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
As it became clear Tuesday night a majority of the American people voted for tyranny, I reviewed Hayek’s Chapter XII in his Road to Serfdom, “Why The Worst Get on Top.”

It perfectly describes Hussein and his party of evil.

6 posted on 11/09/2012 4:29:20 AM PST by Jacquerie (Welcome to arbitrary government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Ping


7 posted on 11/09/2012 4:57:23 AM PST by AdamBomb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Not to be confused with even remotely liking our president, but Ayn Rand despised traditional marriage, disliked children, and was an atheist.


8 posted on 11/09/2012 6:11:14 AM PST by GalaxyAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

She understood, down to the root that ideas are what determine a country’s future and which ones lead to prosperity and which ones lead to barbed wire and machine guns. I wish people could get past her atheism and take a serious look at her ideas. I guess it’s time to buy stock in barbed wire companies.


9 posted on 11/09/2012 6:17:28 AM PST by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalaxyAB
"...Ayn Rand despised traditional marriage, disliked children, and was an atheist..."

However, do not forget that the principles she espouses would leave YOU perfectly free to enter any marriage YOU approved of, have as many kids YOU could support, and worship in any way YOU saw fit.

That describes the American idea of personal freedom.
10 posted on 11/09/2012 7:05:58 AM PST by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rebel_Ace

True...but how will you explain that to those who viscerally oppose gay marriage?


11 posted on 11/09/2012 7:28:57 AM PST by GalaxyAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GalaxyAB
"True...but how will you explain that to those who viscerally oppose gay marriage?"

There are some people so opposed to homosexual activity their religion compels them to fly airplanes into skyscrapers. To those sorts, nothing can be "explained" to them. For others that can exercise some intellectual discipline over visceral reaction, the phrase, "Live and Let Live" comes to mind.
12 posted on 11/09/2012 7:39:57 AM PST by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GalaxyAB

I see the gay marriage issue differently as an Objectivist. I have no Bible based objection to it. What the gay marriage advocates are demanding is a moral sanction and that is not their right to demand. I don’t think the government should ban it but they should also not force people to accept it or perform the ceremony. Ayn Rand found homosexuality disgusting but she was dead set against laws against it. If two gay men want to get married and can find someone to do it then it is not my right to stop them and their marriage is not a reflection on mine or anyone else’s. Every man or woman has a right to pursue happiness as long as they are not harming others. And if others choose not to give their moral sanction then that is their right as well. In a free society people don’t have to deal with each other if they don’t want to.


13 posted on 11/09/2012 7:51:19 AM PST by albionin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: albionin; Rebel_Ace
I do not disagree with either of you.

There are some at Free Republic who confuse freedom, conservatism and their own theocratic view of how society should be organized and function.

14 posted on 11/09/2012 8:24:11 AM PST by GalaxyAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GalaxyAB
"There are some at Free Republic who confuse freedom, conservatism and their own theocratic view of how society should be organized and function. "

Well said, and worthy of repeating.
15 posted on 11/09/2012 9:06:45 AM PST by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GalaxyAB
"I do not disagree with either of you. There are some at Free Republic who confuse freedom, conservatism and their own theocratic view of how society should be organized and function."

Our founders were far more prescient than Rand. They understood that limited government would require a disciplined population willing to morally constrain their own behavior and excesses. In the absence of such, people start pressing government for more laws and increasingly intrusive regulations. When people abandon personal morality, they allow government to become the arbiter of public morality, hence smoking a cigarette is now one of the most unholy acts a person can commit, but wrenching an unborn child from the womb in pieces is not merely a protected right, but virtually a blessed sacrament. Why? Because government says so!

Also, unlike Rand, who despised the traditional views of "altruism" and, "self-sacrifice", our founders understood that people would sometimes have to commit to, and sometimes sacrifice for things greater than themselves, hence their willingness to pledge their lives, fortunes and sacred honor for their countrymen and for future generations.

16 posted on 11/09/2012 9:19:12 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

The expression of your reasoned mind is as brilliant as a bell pealing high and clear through a hushed and frozen winter’s morning.


17 posted on 11/09/2012 3:15:41 PM PST by floralamiss ("For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson