Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Got Over 99% of Vote Where Inspectors were Removed; Turnout Somehow "30%" Above Gov't Numbers
Pundit Press ^ | 11/8/12 | Aurelius

Posted on 11/08/2012 9:22:41 AM PST by rightistight

Across Philadelphia, GOP poll inspectors were forcibly (and illegally) removed from polling locations. Coincidentally (or not), Mr. Obama received "astronomical" numbers in those very same regions, including locations where he received "over 99%" of the vote.

Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Mr. Obama received 99.5% of the vote, defeating Mr. Romney 9,955 to 55.

Is it odd that a county that dispelled GOP inspectors and had people openly campaigning for Obama ended with 99.5% for Obama and 9955 votes for him? It's up to you to decide.

Another problem: "Voter turnout in Philadelphia was around 60 percent, according to state election figures." In these precincts it was well over 90%.

Clear fraud, odd percentages, and numbers that don't add up? Congratulations on your re-election, Mr. Obama.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; election; electionfraud; obama; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 11/08/2012 9:22:47 AM PST by rightistight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightistight

State GOP needs to sue to view voting machines and forms.


2 posted on 11/08/2012 9:24:37 AM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/boards/topic/79493-how-many-times-did-you-vote/


3 posted on 11/08/2012 9:24:50 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

and this: http://phantasytour.com/bands/1/topics/3273720/posts


4 posted on 11/08/2012 9:26:57 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

AND THIS:
http://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/how-many-times-did-you-vote-for-your-candidate.240341/

We are all chumps if we all intend to continue to play by the rules.


5 posted on 11/08/2012 9:29:01 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Maybe they just need to put up webcams outside the polling place to count how many people actually enter and then compare it to the election day vote totals from that location.


6 posted on 11/08/2012 9:29:40 AM PST by BlackBeauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

No point in discussing this anymore. There will be no legal challenges. Any legal challenges will never get anywhere. Look what happened to the whole birther movement: relegated to the dustbin of history.

We KNOW voter fraud happened, and all signs point to it having happened in a massive way. I believe, personally, that instead of voting multiple times, they found a way to nullify or not register votes for Romney.

If you look at my local precinct, for instance, we supposedly voted heavily for Obama, but every single Republican Representative and state Senate candidate won. That makes absolutely no sense.

I personally feel that the GOP-e put Romney in knowing full well he wouldn’t win and have entered in a deal with the Liberals. With both parties against us, the American people are no longer anything more than chattel.


7 posted on 11/08/2012 9:31:40 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

“State GOP needs to sue to view voting machines and forms.”

That would be “racist.”


8 posted on 11/08/2012 9:31:40 AM PST by BlackBeauty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: struggle
State GOP needs to sue to view voting machines and forms.

I'm sure the machines have all been digitally "wiped" by now.

9 posted on 11/08/2012 9:31:46 AM PST by ScottinVA (I've never been more disgusted with American voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

How much more will We the People continue to allow our disenfranchisement of the vote?

“Direct” disenfranchisement refers to actions that explicitly prevent people from voting or having their votes counted, as opposed to “indirect” techniques, which attempt to prevent people’s votes from having an impact on political outcomes (e.g., gerrymandering, ballot box stuffing, stripping elected officials of their powers).

http://www.umich.edu/~lawrace/disenfranchise1.htm

doesn’t seem to have changed a lot.

IMHO we need to hammer the DOJ/Holder on this...and use Breitbart and like-minded folks to challenge this racial discrimination.

Stuff it in their faces.


10 posted on 11/08/2012 9:33:20 AM PST by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

We need to turn off the spigot!


11 posted on 11/08/2012 9:35:38 AM PST by Aria ( 2008 wasn't an election - it was a coup d'etat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
"We are all chumps if we all intend to continue to play by the rules."

Military Junta 2013: Changing Minds, Changing Hearts...

12 posted on 11/08/2012 9:37:17 AM PST by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

America was one of the last free countries in the world, no longer true. Once we turned from In God we Trust to in Man we trust we got plenty of man...

So, after the great disapointment, and resisting the urge to take the blue pill, I guess I will learn to live in the Progressive Republik of Amerika. and wait for God to sort it all out, because He is still Just.

I hope our Congress enjoys the ride, cause the end stop is before an almighy and rather pissed Creator of the Universe. There was a reason our founding fathers put in the oath on the Bible. They think its a Joke, but God does not. Perhaps they should invest in some asbestos underwear..., oh wait, I forgot, they can’t take it with them!


13 posted on 11/08/2012 9:39:02 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: struggle

If these numbers are/were true ... then they would/will rise to the surface.

Maybe this is part of the rising to the surface, but these numbers are publicly available, part of the record.

Please ping me if you have hard numbers, documented, backing up claims like this, or such things as “Romney would have won if the military absentees weren’t delayed.”

I know how democrats work - they would do this if they could get away with it. These two examples - not so much in kind but to extent, however, I don’t buy, and I will gladly wear your tin foil hat if you also hand me hard evidence.

If these things happened - they are part of the public record, so post it.

If you have no evidence, go away. There are more important things to think about now.


14 posted on 11/08/2012 9:39:09 AM PST by HannibalHamlinJr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

Too late to do anything about it now, unless hard evidence of actual fraud is found. Even then, it won’t change the results.

What we need is to be better prepared for next time. Call out the National guard and provide GOP inspectors with escorts to ensure that they are allowed in and are able to perform their duties. Don’t wait for the courts to act after the fact — the fraud will already be baked in if the polling station is allowed to open without proper inspection.


15 posted on 11/08/2012 9:39:37 AM PST by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

I’m tired of the charge that I’m over reacting, by suggesting that massive vote fraud was a key in this election.

Way to many data points remain unexplained, in the absense of fraud.

The refusal of some conservatives to vote for Romney is the other half.


16 posted on 11/08/2012 9:40:14 AM PST by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightistight

“If voting made any difference they wouldn’t let us do it.” Mark Twain


17 posted on 11/08/2012 9:43:21 AM PST by waredbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackBeauty

I think the webcam idea is a great idea.

I also think all electronic voting should give the voter a printed receipt that shows their timestamped vote, and a paper copy of that receipt should be kept by the machine.

That way there is a paper log that can be used to challenge the machine totals. And the web camera can be used to confirm that the number of people is accurate.


18 posted on 11/08/2012 9:43:24 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Way to many data points remain unexplained, in the absense of fraud.

This, +1000

19 posted on 11/08/2012 9:43:57 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy (It's time to make Obama a minor footnote in the pages of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Who controls the National Guard? The Army does now... Who is CiC?

Face it. Our voting system is irrevocably damaged.


20 posted on 11/08/2012 9:44:17 AM PST by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson