Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FUN FACT: Obama Lost in Every State with a Voter Photo-ID Law
Reaganite Republican ^ | 08 November 2012 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 11/08/2012 9:07:27 AM PST by Reaganite Republican



Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed? 
Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected. 

Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). 

This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs. 

Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?



____________________________________________________



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: fraud; id; voter

1 posted on 11/08/2012 9:07:34 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Not true, Michigan has a voter ID law, doesn’t mean Detroit/others followed the law, but most places did.


2 posted on 11/08/2012 9:10:37 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

99% “turnout” in Philly. And you wonder WHY Dems are against photo ID?


3 posted on 11/08/2012 9:10:45 AM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdvisorB; ken5050; sten

*** PING ***


4 posted on 11/08/2012 9:11:50 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

NH has photo ID law.


5 posted on 11/08/2012 9:12:40 AM PST by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
Sorry, NH requires Photo ID but still went 0bama.
I'm so ashamed for my fellow New Hampshirites.
I know it's my fault, I only voted once.

6 posted on 11/08/2012 9:13:09 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

If you know for a fact that they are cheating, then is it still wrong to cheat as well?

What’s the sense in following rules that exist for only one side?


7 posted on 11/08/2012 9:13:17 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

It’s not mandatory, they just ask real nice and are more than willing to take ‘no’ for an answer in Michigan

That’s what the chart says fwiw


8 posted on 11/08/2012 9:14:00 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

No, they just file a provisional ballot. And PA has a voter ID law, it was just stopped by a liberal judge prior to the election.

What is this article trying to prove? "Here's a list of trivia, but since it doesn't amount to anything, we're not going to surmise a conclusion, instead leaving that to you."

FUN FACT: Of the 10 states with two words in its name, 50% voted for Obama and 50% voted for Romney. So what?

9 posted on 11/08/2012 9:15:49 AM PST by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Very interesting! Voting fraud is so easy in this country. Worse system than m,any 3rd world countries and communist countries and dictator countries. What a disgusting shame!


10 posted on 11/08/2012 9:16:40 AM PST by entropy12 (Ready for 3 SCOTUS appointments like Kagan, Sotomayor & Ginsburg? Free abortion on demand is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodbutcher1963
NH’s law is not yet fully active.
Under the new law, which is being phased in over a year, voters who do not have photo identification at the polls will still be allowed to vote after executing what the state calls a challenged voter affidavit. Voters who fill out the affidavit will receive a letter requesting confirmation of voting. If there is no response within a month, the state may investigate to determine if voting fraud occurred. After September 1, 2013, voters must have photo identification. …
Sounds like it is still open to fraud, to me.
11 posted on 11/08/2012 9:16:47 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Actually, in Michigan you can vote without a photo ID. The poll workers always ask you for one and scan it into their computer... But there’s also an affidavit on the back of the voter card they hand you. No photo ID? Just sign it and you can vote.

My coworker runs a polling place, explained the whole thing. I doesn’t sound difficult for a single person to go around and sign these affidavits left and right and vote for other people...


12 posted on 11/08/2012 9:18:33 AM PST by jr48154
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Here is how it goes in Florida, Orange County, heavily Democrat, mostly minority, and I’m a hated white male:

POLL WORKER: I.D. please.

POLL WORKER: State your full name.

ME: subterfuge/regular guy

POLL WORKER: (Eyes Photo I.D., looks me up and down like criminal). Okay, here is your ballot.


13 posted on 11/08/2012 9:20:04 AM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
No, they don’t require ID yet, so long as you fill out an affidavit, and the affidavit process looks fishy. I pointed out one of the quirks with NH’s law in post 11.
14 posted on 11/08/2012 9:21:39 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

Yes. It's illegal to do otherwise. It's "disenfranchisement" or possibly "profiling."

Oboma won with blacks (expected), woman who vote with their crotches, and Hispanics.
This is odd, because a lot of the Hispanics are very religious people who don't support the lefts policy of advocating unbridled nasty pig type sex and their uncontrollable lust for every other type of sin.

15 posted on 11/08/2012 9:24:00 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Early voting and absentee voting scams and motor voter were
Tailored made fraud and double voting .
Fl needs to stop early voting


16 posted on 11/08/2012 9:27:50 AM PST by ncalburt (Axelrod Psych OPS has gone to 24/7 non stop - "The election is over " status until Nov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

He lost in Georgia as well, and we have voter ID law although Eric Holder tried to sue the State to prevent but later dropped the lawsuit.

The GOP is at super majority status in both the house and the senate here...libs need not relocate here.


17 posted on 11/08/2012 9:29:53 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike (The left has been at war with us...we have not been at war with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
If you know for a fact that they are cheating, then is it still wrong to cheat as well?

Yes.

What’s the sense in following rules that exist for only one side?

There's sense if you follow rules in ways they don't expect.

18 posted on 11/08/2012 9:34:11 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Pre-completed ballots are such a time-saver!


19 posted on 11/08/2012 9:39:54 AM PST by mikrofon (+ Prayers for America +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madison10

If you don’t have photo ID in MI, you just sign an affidavit and then can cast a regular ballot.

GOP guv Rick Snyder vetoed a tighter law:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/03/us-usa-michigan-voterid-idUSBRE8621CG20120703

The article says he also vetoed the requirement for voters to attest citizenship.


20 posted on 11/08/2012 9:42:04 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

So in Florida you are asked to show ID, and if you don’t, they give you a Provisional ballot, and those are only counted/checked if there is a recount? Or are those automatically looked at and put in the total?


21 posted on 11/08/2012 9:48:59 AM PST by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

I was required to show my driver’s license with photo, plus sign my name before I could vote in Ohio.

This has been the case for the last two years.


22 posted on 11/08/2012 10:00:52 AM PST by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Was the election stolen?.We know but the trouble for the dems is just about to start,cell numbers to ensue.


23 posted on 11/08/2012 10:15:56 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude
If you know for a fact that they are cheating, then is it still wrong to cheat as well?""""".....

What’s the sense in following rules that exist for only one side?"""".....

_______________________________________________________

I think it is high time we tried something. Their rules have now become "Common LAW", and is thus legal.

Example:common law marriages, anything done over a length of time with no objection it becomes Common Law and legal.

Time is overdue to get started.

24 posted on 11/08/2012 10:19:48 AM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Forget simple voter ID with a license. You’re never going to get it. There is no reason for the Dems to agree to it. However, a 4473 and NICS style background check has basis in law and given that the Dems support it so much for owning a gun, they have no ground to stand on to be against it for voting. Extend the voting period from a single day to 7 days to account for the phoned in background checks and there is no problem.

If the Dems are against this, then they need to put their money where their mouth is and repeal the same background check for buying a firearm. Push the issue until one or the other happens. Make it a big deal for voting since it’s not considered racist or a violation of Civil Rights regarding the 2nd Amendment.


25 posted on 11/08/2012 10:24:19 AM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Not true. CT requires ID


26 posted on 11/08/2012 10:27:00 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jr48154

In MN, you not only don’t need any ID, you can “vouch” for up to 13 of your alleged friends or neighbors in line.

Can you say Franken 2012?


27 posted on 11/08/2012 10:52:41 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kidd

The CT website says: Acceptable forms of identification to fulfill this federal HAVA requirement are a current and valid photo ID that shows the elector’s name and address, or a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck or government document that shows the name and address of the voter.


28 posted on 11/08/2012 10:55:17 AM PST by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

This whole headline’s premise would be great to be researched by John Fund.


29 posted on 11/08/2012 10:56:51 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Bttt


30 posted on 11/08/2012 11:14:22 AM PST by petercooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
It’s not mandatory, they just ask real nice and are more than willing to take ‘no’ for an answer in Michigan

That’s what the chart says fwiw

In PA the Republicans planned to change from the unit rule to the “per-congressional-district” rule for selecting Electors. The Democrats counter offered to support photo ID instead. Naturally, the Republicans fell for it - and just as naturally, the Democrats sued to keep the law from taking effect until after this election. The rule being “jam tomorrow, and jam yesterday - but never jam today.”

The Republican state legislature should now amend that law, IMHO, to require that the “per-congressional-district” rule be instated, at least in any presidential election in which the photo-ID rule is not enforced.


31 posted on 11/08/2012 12:49:32 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

In NH, voter ID law was passed. But the ACLU went to court and a Judge said we could not use it on Nov 6th.

The discussion of voter ID exposed all the ways to do it and thus, Obama bused students from everywhere to vote and many voted twice and then bragged about it.

So basically we taught them how to do it and then the Judge allowed it.


32 posted on 11/08/2012 2:10:10 PM PST by CowHampshire (NH, Tea Party, International Baccalaureate, Totalitarianism, Fascism, Taxation, Soros, NWO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

I voted for Romney and I am a woman, so I find your comment quite childish and ignorant. If you believe women vote with their crotches, you make no sense in saying that’s why Obama “won” because both candidates were men. . . It was voter fraud with democraps voting multiple times. I heard people joking about it at the polls, saying “this is the 5th time I’ll be voting tonight”. Turns out it wasn’t a joke. I would bet that if the truth were told, more women voted for Romney than Obama, because I believe Romney won the election if you discount all of the fraud that went on. I love my country, but the voting process is a joke.


33 posted on 11/15/2012 10:55:46 AM PST by stranded (Women for Romney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson