Michael Weaver posted this on Facebook:
Posted on 10/15/2012 12:56:00 PM PDT by 92nina
Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) codified their war on American drivers by finalizing new car mileage mandates, otherwise known as CAFÉ standards. Increasing the cost of new cars by thousands of dollars, new CAFÉ rules will require cars built in 2025 to get at least 54.5 miles per gallon. With current 2011 cars averaging 28.6 miles per gallon, the EPA is going to require automotive manufacturers to nearly double fuel economy standards in a little more than a decade.
While the Obama administration has made the 2009 Auto-Bailout one of the center-pieces of their re-election campaign, the reality is that these new rules will affect and cost consumers more money. Emily Wismer, Policy Analyst for Independent Women’s Forum writes:
While it sounds fantastic to drive twice as far on each tank of gas, this extra efficiency comes at a large, up-front cost to consumers: New cars are expected to cost about $2000 more because of this mandate. As a result, many potential new car buyers will be priced out of the market. The effects of higher new car costs will ripple into the used car market, as fewer families will be able to trade in old vehicles for a new car. That means less supply and more demand for used cars, and higher prices for used cars as well.
Ms. Wismer’s $2,000 figure might actually understate the actually cost of complying with the EPA’s newest mandate. Bill Underriner, chairman of the National Automobile Dealers Association, estimates that the new regulations could increase the cost of new cars by $3,000 which would “shut almost 7 million people out of the new car market entirely and prevent many millions more from being able to afford new vehicles that meet their needs."
The Obama Administration hails new CAFÉ rules as a necessity to save consumers money at the pump. If higher mileage standards are inherently such a good deal, one has to wonder why the government must ratchet up CAFÉ rules. Consumers are more than capable of deciding what car they would like to drive and what they fill their car up with. Next time you hear about a government mandate coming to save you money, make sure to hold on to your wallet.
Read more: http://atr.org/epa-finalizes-yet-another-expensive-mandate-a7249#ixzz29OoJiskx
I think it is because most are Statists: there is nothing that their god [the state] cannot do.
Maybe a legal assumption applies: Silence implies consent.
By what stretch of the imagination does an American government set any automobile mileage standards?
Where is this power found in the Constitution?
What’s Congress’ role in all this?
When was there a vote and who introduced the bill?
Which Amendment allows the executive branch to make law?
That’s the economics of government intervention. Make it costly to do what you want and people will find a work around.
Bastiat was right.
How about letting Congress pass laws and the EPA can simply suggest them? The executive branch cannot, by our Constitution, make law.
“I can easily foresee a future where the most important inheritance will be a well maintained antique car “
That’s why I own a 57 Bel Air and a 67 Camaro which I am restoring to bulletproof condition (stainless steel bolts, rustproofing, etc). They will go to my young niece, she can drive them to eternity. The Bel Air especially is built like a tank.
I’ve run the numbers, even with poor mileage you still come out ahead because of much lower upkeep, interest, etc. You get a non-depreciating car that’s top of the line if you just do quality maintenance and a few upgrades.
“I can easily foresee a future where the most important inheritance will be a well maintained antique car “
That’s why I own a 57 Bel Air and a 67 Camaro which I am restoring to bulletproof condition (stainless steel bolts, rustproofing, etc). They will go to my young niece, she can drive them to eternity. The Bel Air especially is built like a tank.
I’ve run the numbers, even with poor mileage you still come out ahead because of much lower upkeep, interest, etc. You get a non-depreciating car that’s top of the line if you just do quality maintenance and a few upgrades.
Why don’t they just mandate we all travel on magic carpets? They don’t usr any resources just magic.
Sounds promising, I have a 67 Camaro myself as a fun car.
But the feds will drive all these off the roads via legislation, most likely via tailpipe emission testing.
It’s possible you might get a 1000 mile / yr historiacal exemption or something similar, but no way they’re gonna let you dodge the bullets they’re firing.
And after the accidents skyrocket, expect the government to demand speed limits only faster than a snail’s velocity.
I am aware of the risks as you are. But if things get that bad, we may be in Thunderdome territory anyway, in which case enviro laws will be broken by everyone.
It's another piece of Obama's "war on the suburbs" disguised as an EPA/high mileage requirement. Of course they know millions and millions of people won't be able to afford new (or used) vehicles when this goes into effect. That's exactly what they're counting on.
Thanks 92nina.
Michael Weaver posted this on Facebook:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
