Washington Post Thinks All Muslims Are Savages

Atlas Shrugs ^ | October 11, 2012 | Pamela Geller

[Perseverando]

The hypocrisy of the enemedia is stunning. Robert Spencer explains how it is not my ads, but the leftists and Islamic supremacists who are opposing them, and their enemedia cheerleaders, who think all Muslims are savages: Washington Post: Don't deface pro-freedom ads, just surrender to jihadists instead Jihadwatch

How much has our public discourse degenerated? This much: one of the most prominent, popular and respected Muslim spokesmen on the scene is Reza Aslan, who has recently been unmasked as a Board member of a front group for Iran's bloody Islamic regime. Aslan is also a Left-fascist who has called for obstruction of our freedom of speech by means of vandalism of our pro-freedom ads. Aslan employs Nathan Lean, a thug who has threatened me repeatedly, repeats what he knows to be falsehoods about my record, and has been arrested for shouting obscenities at a city council meeting.

In a sane world, people like Reza Aslan and Nathan Lean would be regarded with suspicion and disdain by all free people. In ours, Lean gets space in the Los Angeles Times and New York Daily News to defame me and my colleagues, and to call for restriction of our freedom of speech. But even someone as obviously dull-witted as Nathan Lean has apparently realized that calls for restrictions on the freedom of speech still don't sit well with most Americans, and so now in the Washington Post he has taken another tack, broken with his boss Aslan and called for our ads not to be vandalized -- which doesn't at all mean that he has suddenly gained an appreciation for Constitutional freedoms.

"Don’t deface anti-Muslim Metro ads," by Nathan Lean in the Washington Post, October 8 (thanks to all who sent this in):

When vitriolic advertisements that equated

[Roccus]

Washington Post Thinks All Muslims Are Savages

So do I!!

It's just a matter of timing and circumstances for them to show their true colors.

[Delhi Rebels]

Aren’t they?

[clamper1797]

When push comes to shove ... So do I

[Talisker]

For Muslims NOT to be savages, you’d have to accept absolute female slavery, and the murder of any non-Muslim or any Muslim who wants to leave the faith or any homosexual or any woman who refuses to agree with her slavery in any way, as NOT savagery.

You know why inroads were made in America to introduce Islam in the Black community? This wasn’t about “freeing the blacks.” It was because Leftists and Muslims realized that Islam wants to impose the exact things Blacks were freed from - the exact same levels of slavery. So they had to move first, and co-opt Black people before they realized who and what these bastards really were. And so - bingo - the Black Muslims arose, supposedly in support of Black “freedom” - redefined as Muslim slavery and all it entails.

This was planned and implemented back in the 60’s, folks.