Her sons Social Security number was used for employment purposes in 2001, 2003, 2004, 2007, and 2009. (Her son was born in 2006 and even though the number had been used illegally for years, the Social Security Administration still assigned it to him. The fraudulent use of her sons number resulted in three felony identity fraud charges and two felony forgery charges). Her sons record showed credit charges totaling $10,397 with Ms. Aguirre co-signing with her husband. This included an auto loan in 2006 of approximately $9000 and another in 1999 for pots and pans. (No charges have been brought for these felonies). Medical care was obtained under her sons number. This included collections totaling around $7000 and 11 accounts at various facilities of a local health care group plus care at an OB/GYN's office and some pathology items. (No charges have been brought for these felonies). A pathology bill was paid for by Medicaid which raises the question of whether Ms, Aguirre illegally received government benefits by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security number. (No charges have been brought for these possible felonies). Ms. Aguirre had also used another fraudulently obtained Social Security number meaning that she has still committed more felonies and more importantly that there may be another identity theft victim. (No charges have been brought for these felonies).
A dirty little secret. The Social Security Administration does not care if someone else, usually an illegal alien, is using your child’s social security number. This is quite common these days.
They're not hurting anyone.
Lesser charges because the worse the charges the more it reflects back on Obama’s back door dream act.
According to reports, Obama is using somebody else’s SS number, so why is this lady complaining? It’s the Chicago Way. sarc/off
According to reports, Obama is using somebody else’s SS number, so why is this lady complaining? It’s the Chicago Way. sarc/off
The Utah Dept. Of Workforce Services found that her son's SS# had income being reported under it. They had to have obtained that information from SS's database. The fact that SSA then denied having any record of wages under the number is very troubling. To me, it indicates that SS is complicit in the fraud.
Wanna bet Mrs. Aguirre in in Mexico when the sentence date, Sept 24 rolls around?
I have a friend that is going through a similar incident right now. Though I don’t think it’s nearly this severe.
A few years back my brother was iinformed by the IRS he was working 9 jobs in 5 states and owed over $50,000 in additional taxes. That mess took over a year to clear up.
BTW, the eight other jobs had all set with holdings at married and 9 dependents so little or no taxes were with held.
BTW, the eight other jobs had all set with holdings at married and 9 dependents so little or no taxes were with held.
Happened to my nephew.
Was told he had to have DHS sort it out.
So frustrated, he had a mental breakdown.