Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA President on Differences Between 'Wide Receiver' and 'Fast and Furious'
MRCtv ^ | July 6, 2012 | MRCtv

Posted on 07/07/2012 11:42:17 AM PDT by hamboy

The liberal media continues to make a connection between "Operation Fast and Furious" under the Obama and "Operation Wide Receiver" under Bush, and major news outlets have made no effort to explain the difference.

MRCTV sat down with NRA president David Keene, who explains the fundamental difference between these two operations.

http://www.mrctv.org/embed/114643

 

(Excerpt) Read more at mrctv.org ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2deadfeds; 300deadmexicans; atf; banglist; brianterry; dea; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fastfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; ice; jaimezapata; murdergate; nra; obama; terry; zapata

1 posted on 07/07/2012 11:42:31 AM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hamboy
NRA President on Differences Between 'Wide Receiver' and 'Fast and Furious'

Ummmmmm..... how many CBP agents and Mexicans were killed by 'Wide Receiver'?

Oh, I remember: None.

2 posted on 07/07/2012 12:03:41 PM PDT by Mikey_1962 (Obama: The Affirmative Action President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

The left (including the MSM) is trying to make these two totally different operations the same thing. It’s all they’ve got, and it’s a old leftist tactic: Accuse your enemy of committing the same crimes you’re committing, to make them look as guilty as you.


3 posted on 07/07/2012 12:38:06 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

The difference between ‘Wide Receiver’ and ‘Fast and Furious’ is obvious based upon the actions , rather than spin and rhetoric.

‘Wide Receiver’ was designed to:
(#1)catch criminals, and
(#2)follow the weapons with tracking devices
(#3)incarcerate criminals with
(#4)Mexican authorities full knowledge.

‘Fast and Furious’ was designed to:
(#1)supply firearms to criminals ,
(#2)provide no tracking deivces
(#3) change American values towards firearms and firearms registration,
(#4) without Mexican authorities knowledge.

Now , look at the above scenarios and see which makes more sense .

Remember , that according to released information ,Border Agent Brian Terry was:
in uniform
was 30 miles INSIDE the US border
was armed with a “bean-bag (non-lethal)” weapon per Dept. Homeland Security directive
was shot/killed with a ‘Fast and Furious ‘ provided weapon.
That no appology was offered by the Dept. of Justice (”Just-us”) until almost 17 months after the fact, and it was offered by Holder ... TO THE PRESS , not to the FAMILY, who only heard about it thru press reports.

Does anything else need to be said .. ??


4 posted on 07/07/2012 3:02:12 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson