Fantasy Islam vs. Islam

Brussels Journal ^ | Sun, 2012-06-03 08:59 | Diana West

[jmacusa]

If the bloody ‘’religion’’ were so ‘’peaceful’’, why the need for ‘’moderation’’? Wouldn't that make the argument it isn't ‘’peaceful’’? Ask someone that question.

[Norm Lenhart]

Kidding aside, the statement “Islam is a religion of peace” is 100% true to a muslim because the ‘peace of Islam’ is sharia law. Sharia law condones wife beating, sex with boys and animals and killing infidels. Ergo, a muslim doing those things is a muslim at peace. By the very definition of the term.

The infidel does not ‘understand’ that it could be much worse for them. So they must be lulled into a false sense of security by taquyya. So begins the idea of a ‘moderate muslim. In practice, a moderate muslim is any old garden variety muslim, but sent through the taquyya reality altering verbage filter for infidel consumption.

He then emerges as a walking contradiction which dhimmis gather round and lie profusely over to further a clearly impossible idea. As Gobbels discovered, a lie, repeated often enough, becomes the truth. Therefore, you have the existance of the moderate muslim in ‘fact’, word and deed.

When the moderate muslim commits an act of evil, it is not he at fault, but you. When the moderate muslim does a deed contrary to the moderate muslim lie, it only appears so because the infidel is not qualified to judge the heart of a muslim and only displays the islamophobia.

See? Simple. Now go and convert before a moderate muslim reads your blasphemy and causes more people to misread his intent to behead you.

[jmacusa]

LOL! Seriously though does the ‘’moderate Muslim’’ fly the plane into the building or does he sit back and watch?