Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama & Gay Marriage: Is GOP best response: "Romney did it too" OR "Romney did it First"?
Bloggers & Personal ^ | 10 May 12 | Xzins

Posted on 05/10/2012 6:33:32 AM PDT by xzins

Barack Obama has come out of the closet....at least about gay marriage. Until now he has kept Willie and Pete stuffed in a corner behind Moochelle's expensive sweaters and shoes. Tiring of hiding them, and with so much cash and positive media coverage at stake, he finally ushered them out into the limelight as his version of North Carolina smackdown. How dare those yokel Tarheels vote down gay marriage! Damn hillbillies!

Republicans have rallied to North Carolina's side!

Uhhh....wait a minute...last night's Fox News "Red Eye" spent most of the showing demeaning all things North Carolina decision as well. How dare they vote down everyone's God given right to poke holes in a cesspool. (See Romans 1&2 about same-sex relationships and inexcusable violations of nature.)

Now for Republicans, the bad news. (No, I actually mean conservatives who are supporting the GOP so far this year. If it ever did, Republican no longer equals conservative.)

Mitt Romney had gay marriage out of his closet years ago. So the only question is this. When responding to Obama's initiative is it best for a conservative: (1) To be silent (The “I need to avoid hypocrisy” response), or (2) To Say "Romney did it too." (The “I want some media adulation too” response), or (3) To say, "Romney did it best!" (The “proudly grab the initiative” response.)

Please spare me the arguments about Romney either converting or not really being able to help what he did. If he converts any more than he has in the past, Romney will get his own Transformer action figure.

And if we argue "He couldn't help it." maybe he should get his own bobblehead, 'cause the Good Lord knows, it's enough to make you laugh at a silly drifting with the wind character. And it will keep you from crying.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: elections; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; obama; romney; romneytruthfile

1 posted on 05/10/2012 6:33:37 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xzins

Apparently the GOP response is to shout down anyone who asks such questions.

Seems pretty cowardly to me.


2 posted on 05/10/2012 6:34:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; narses; Salvation; little jeremiah; P-Marlowe; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; Jim Robinson

Ping


3 posted on 05/10/2012 6:36:48 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You miss a huge factor: Obama’s supporters versus Romney’s supporters. We don’t have Kings who rule by edict. Obamas pro gay stances are far more dangerous than Mitts - simply because the majority of Obama’s supporters will gleefully push that agenda.

This is not to excuse Romney - that’s not the point. The point is how malignantly dangerous to our society the two sides are. One if far more malignant than the other, even if they are both equally un pure. Which they are.


4 posted on 05/10/2012 6:39:38 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I'm glad the chOsen one has "come out" in support of gay marriage. The polls in most states tell me exactly what I've always thought on the topic. While most support it with a microphone in their face, they do NOT support it in their hearts, minds, and voting booths.

FUBO X whateverthedeficitnumberis.

5 posted on 05/10/2012 6:41:39 AM PDT by Mich Patriot (Today if you invent a better mousetrap, the government comes along with a better mouse. RReagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Republican no longer equals conservative.)

Did it ever?

Obviously Romney would only be slightly better than Urkel as President but our focus and energy would be better spent making sure as many Tea Partiers as possible get elected to Congress to minimize the harm a President Romney (gag!) or President Obama (puke!) can inflict on humanity.

6 posted on 05/10/2012 6:43:44 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

So, does this finish his waffle?


7 posted on 05/10/2012 6:45:46 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

What is the next ‘hot’ topic of discussion to keep the public distracted from the main issue facing us all, THE ECONOMY!


8 posted on 05/10/2012 6:47:39 AM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The RAT game plan is to ATTACK ROMNEY for anything that will stick, so it can help their socialist candidate.

The continuation of criticism against Romney is nothing more than promoting the RAT game plan.

On the other hand. Pressuring Romney to STICK TO CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES is another thing.

So, anytime I see continuing CRITICISM of Romney, I see it as nothing more than taking aim to shoot down our chances of defeating Obama. That is the work of the RATs! and I view that with great suspicion now.

On the other hand, promoting positive conservative positions for Romney to maintain is another!


9 posted on 05/10/2012 6:48:08 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA (Pick Your Poison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Larry Kudlow was interviewed this morning on Chicago WLS radio and he said that this is just another diversion by Obama to flee questions about the economy and loss of millions of jobs which is what American are really concerned about.

Kudlow said that it is also a trap set by Obama for Romney to fall into by getting off message about the economy.

http://www.creators.com/opinion/lawrence-kudlow.html

http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=2453166&spid=


10 posted on 05/10/2012 6:48:42 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Did it ever?

Maybe for a few years when Reagan was in office, when they had to be dragged kicking and screaming.

11 posted on 05/10/2012 6:49:10 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Spot on.


12 posted on 05/10/2012 6:50:21 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

Romney needs to put a big sign in his campaign office, “IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID.”


13 posted on 05/10/2012 6:50:29 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

You are correct.....Mitt would never have the guts to put a flaming sodomite in charge of the educational system of our children like zero. Brainwashing, conditioning and sexualizing young children is blatantly happening with ignorant parents thinking it is “progressive”.

Marxists always go after the children—to change their worldview (with lies and sex education to destroy Christian morality and insert pagan/atheism).
The parents with the “old fashioned ideas of Judeo/Christian Ethics” will die off in a decade or so anyways.

Marxists have subverted public education since Dewey and got total control under Carter. Schools and media are forming the foundation of “Right and Wrong” in our children based on the Satanic religion and Alinsky. OWS are examples of what public school vomits out.....they are devoid of reason and Christian morality-—just useful idiots to be controlled and directed by Marxists.


14 posted on 05/10/2012 6:56:03 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

15 posted on 05/10/2012 6:56:32 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"I do not favor marriage between people of the same gender, and I do not favor civil unions if they are identical to marriage other than by name,"

Seems like Romney has already given his response.

-------------------------------------------------------

His record in liberal MA could have been a lot better but:

"Romney was a leading voice against gay marriage as Massachusetts governor. The courts legalized gay marriage in the state during his tenure, but he supported a constitutional amendment to define marriage as the union of a man and a woman.

After gay marriage became legal, Romney sought to enforce a statute banning state officials from marrying gay couples from other states. In a speech to conservatives last winter, Romney touted that move, saying he prevented Massachusetts from becoming the "Las Vegas of gay marriage."

----------------------------------------------------

Sure, he did a lot of bad things as well, but our choice is Romney or Obama. Which is it going to be?

16 posted on 05/10/2012 7:04:38 AM PDT by icwhatudo (This is not a choice between Romney&Reagan-Its between Romney & most radical leftist Pres in history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Well, Kudlow is partly right. Then again, Kudlow was gushing in 08 and 09 about how brilliant Elizabeth Warren is. Larry stepem in heap big doo doo on that one.

But it’s not “the economy” versus the social issues. The “economy” issue is actually about liberty in all of life, and it just manifests itself by killing the economy. That’s another point limosuine Larry misses.


17 posted on 05/10/2012 7:10:39 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

The answer is obvious. However, expect Obama supporters, disguising themselves as conservatives, to try to discourage us from voting against Obama and making absurd claims such as there is no difference between Obama and Romney.


18 posted on 05/10/2012 7:11:03 AM PDT by Jane Austen (Boycott the Philadelphia Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Less than 2% if that many are queer. Why are we talking about this? Because Obama has nothing else.

Mark my words, Obama will not only lose but he will lose by huge numbers. Numbers so large that no amount of fraud will overcome it.


19 posted on 05/10/2012 7:14:21 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

Mitt would never have the guts

You mean that? I would suggest he wouldn’t have the moral turpitude necessary to make such disgusting decisions.

But I could be wrong. He DID do healthcare...


20 posted on 05/10/2012 7:21:22 AM PDT by Adder (Da bro has GOT to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Did anyone catch Shep Smith’s glib descriptions of anyone who opposes Gay Marriage in questions yesterday to Brett Baher and the WH Correspondent? He phrased his questions with sarcasm to sound like anyone who opposes Gay Marriage doesn’t live in this century. I am beginning to think Shep is Gay himself.


21 posted on 05/10/2012 7:33:05 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

If you saw the neighbor boy trying to mate with a knothole or his cat, you’d yell at him and think he should be in an institution. Yet, if a man attempts to mate with another man’s anal canal, or a woman attempts to mate with an electrified rubber appliance, that’s OK? They are as insane as the kid trying to mate with a knothole.


22 posted on 05/10/2012 7:34:11 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
I am beginning to think Shep is Gay himself.

You're a little late to the party, but welcome, just the same.

23 posted on 05/10/2012 7:34:45 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“Little late to the party”. I plead guilty. Shep probably has the one Fox show that I rarely watch, therefore, I haven’t paid much attention to him in the past.


24 posted on 05/10/2012 7:41:13 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins

GOP response should be: “no hungry children have been fed by the recent focus on same sex marriage. President Obama continues to fail on the economy.”


25 posted on 05/10/2012 7:53:51 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Place for Conservatives

Liberals do not want liberty for anyone.
They would rather dictate what we do, what we buy, where we go and when, and what we can do while there.
Please donate.
The Republic you save may be your own.


26 posted on 05/10/2012 8:21:27 AM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Adder

I do not have a high regard for the rational abilities of any man Romney’s age since he truly believes in a cult. The claims are so ridiculous, the irrationality can be detected by teenagers. I do admire many Mormons lifestyles, but not their intellectual capacity and reasoning skills.

Romney has voiced his support of “civil unions” which is validating an obscene nihilistic sexual urge which gives it legal force—to force the sexualization onto young children which is what discussions of any “right” to sodomy which can NEVER exist in a sane society. The idea of sodomy is “good” forced by laws to be forced onto the “thinking” of young children, destroys logic and thinking in children. Just Laws—read my tagline.

The whole discussion of “homosexuality” “civil unions’ is to sexualize children—to desensitize them to the issue. It posits the idea of sodomy as “good”—to destroy all Judeo/Christian ethics which it always undermines and focus attention on sex which destroys the normal sexual formation of children—innocence in childhood is essential for normal sexual development. Abused children grow up to be abnormal. Look up Afghanistan boys beliefs.
Ideas are everything and create the future worldview of children. We need to promote the Constitution which is about the Laws of Nature and Common Sense. There is no sense in recognizing obscene nihilistic actions —to promote the General Welfare????? What a laugh.

Worldview is learned in the formative years....we are forcing the pagan practices where pederasty was also normal (since it was a natural urge). Reason should always trump urges in law.

Christianity can not exist if it doesn’t contain sexual morality. It becomes religionless—as Bonhoeffer stated when he went to so called “Christian” churches in NYC funded by the pagan Rockefeller in 1931.. Mormons are not Christians, btw.

They have a history of racism and sexism and polygamy....things considered irrational and evil by Christian Theology. Christianity, as DiSouza wrote in his book on Christianity—researches religions and Christianity is the most rational religion in the history of man. Because of men like St. Thomas Aquinas—the Father of Catholic Theology—basically took Christianity and aligned it with Natural Law Theory (Reason and logic).

Not that I would ever vote for a Marxist like zero....I am very disappointed in the “choice” of GOP candidate and will hold my nose like I did last election.
The system is rigged by the One Worlders. I know that....they have to destroy the Virtue which is necessary for a Civil society with freedom to exist.

If you study the Cultural Marxists from the 1930’s, you can understand the Marxist/progressive force of abnormal irrational “lifestyle” choices It is to destroy all our institutions, make laws “irrational”—exactly opposite of what is required for Just law—to take down the fundamental building block of all free societies—the family unit and God.


27 posted on 05/10/2012 8:31:35 AM PDT by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not; wagglebee

Let’s not talk about social issues, they don’t matter. Let’s just talk about the economy. Who cares about the nation’s embrace, and Romney’s embrace, of the UNNATURAL?

Let us be clear, if UNNATURAL is OK in one realm, it is also OK in others. Over-spending is a MORAL issue first, but we say ignore morality.

We have millions who are just fine with voting for those who will overspend and overspend to keep them in things.

They will willingly try to suspend the NATURAL LAW of cause and effect. As we know, though, it will come crashing down on their heads.

Why? Because they ignore morality thinking they are the gods of their own destiny.


28 posted on 05/10/2012 9:34:40 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Social issues and economic issues do go hand in hand....the breakup of the traditional family is a pre-requisite for the Welfare State.


29 posted on 05/10/2012 9:35:43 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Absolutely awesome post, gator. Thanks.


30 posted on 05/10/2012 9:39:29 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Obamas pro gay stances are far more dangerous than Mitts - simply because the majority of Obama’s supporters will gleefully push that agenda.

Hi, CEW.

In a congress of democrats, rinos, and conservatives, a pro-gay Romney will be able to push the gay agenda if he decides to. The dems + the rinos + the president will equal a majority.

Except for his secret ambitions, Mitt Romney would be a democrat. We all know it.

31 posted on 05/10/2012 9:44:48 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I think it would be best if the GOP not lie, so that would rule out both of your suggestions.


32 posted on 05/10/2012 9:50:01 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You missed my point, and made it - at the same time. That’s quite a trick.


33 posted on 05/10/2012 9:59:20 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Apparently I meet with your approval except when I don’t.

:>)


34 posted on 05/10/2012 10:01:40 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode not Evil (the lesser of 2 evils is still evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen

And there are Rinos trying to make the case Romney is so great and will be the most conservative candidate on earth, while they plan on backstabbing conservatives. In fact some Dems have joined to chorus because they can get Romney to the nomination which is nearly complete and then have it much easier than with Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum. The Dems infiltrated the GOP and backed Romney, IMO.


35 posted on 05/10/2012 11:58:09 AM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA
Pressuring Romney to STICK TO CONSERVATIVE PRINCIPLES is another thing.

Why on earth do you think that is possible? Romney has proven over and over again the only principle he believes in is doing what is best for himself.

Putting the fate of conservatism in the hands of a man with no principles will set the conservative movement back at least a decade. A Romney Presidency means eight years without even a moderately conservative President in the White House and guarantees Republican loses in Congress and at the state level.

You just don't seem to grasp the dangers of a Romney Presidency.

36 posted on 05/10/2012 12:03:46 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen

So in other words, Democrat infiltrators and Rinos are desperately trying to fool the public that Romney would be so much better than Obama. Then they’ll attack him or get him to move even further left than Obama.


37 posted on 05/10/2012 12:04:44 PM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Obama’s supporters (Obamabots) and Romney’s supporters (Mittbots) are both non-conservative. The real conservatives are fighting both guys tool and nail each step of the way.


38 posted on 05/10/2012 12:14:10 PM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Virgil Goode: On the Issues
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iR1WxNWkSMo


39 posted on 05/10/2012 12:31:26 PM PDT by Mozilla (Constitution Party 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
When the GOP talks or even responds to topics such as the so called war on women, or gay marriage, or forcing the church to pay for abortions, it is playing right into the DNC playbook.

It is becoming apparent that the DNC (with the help of the media) are going to keep throwing this crap out to keep the discussion everywhere but where it should be: the economy.

Of course its asking a lot for a party stupid enough to nominate Romney to figure this out.

40 posted on 05/10/2012 1:00:15 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

You missed my point. I was just referring those nonsense comments regarding Obama vs Romney (or whoever runs against him). I do not like Romney, but he sure is much better than Obama, at least stood against gay marriage when I was in Mass.


41 posted on 05/10/2012 1:49:18 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Boycott the Philadelphia Eagles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
Obama’s supporters (Obamabots) and Romney’s supporters (Mittbots) are both non-conservative. The real conservatives are fighting both guys tool and nail each step of the way.

That is technically true, but the Obamabots are way left of the typical Mitt bot. And in fact, while no real conservatives are Mitt bots, he will have large "support" from ABO folks, who are way right of Obama Bots. I realize its' stylish on FR to lump Mitt and Obama together - but lumping their supporters together is just intellectually illogical.

42 posted on 05/10/2012 1:58:39 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: doc
What is the next ‘hot’ topic of discussion to keep the public distracted from the main issue facing us all, THE ECONOMY!

Let me suggest that it is the socialists that use government to impose their morality and their sense of justice upon us all that is the main issue. The balance sheet is simply a symptom and homosexual sex premised rights are one issue out of many bankrupt ideas that taxpayers are forced to foot the bill for.

Useful idiots are the ones claiming there is a disconnect between government imposed moral bankruptcy and the subsequent fiscal bankruptcy e.g. bad economy that results.

What drives the government to manipulate the economy?

In this topic discussion, who would be paying benefits to homosexual sex partners nationwide and now pays benefits to homosexual sex partners at the federal level?

Get a clue or get out out of the way.

43 posted on 05/10/2012 6:38:56 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
When the GOP talks or even responds to topics such as the so called war on women, or gay marriage, or forcing the church to pay for abortions, it is playing right into the DNC playbook.

It is becoming apparent that the DNC (with the help of the media) are going to keep throwing this crap out to keep the discussion everywhere but where it should be: the economy.

Anyone can point to a deficit; however, leadership requires pointing out the cause and to some degree greater than spending too much. The cause of spending too much is a big government that imposes it sense of morality upon the people. It is a government religion that seeks to impose all manners of 'justice' that we as conservatives are fighting against!

So ask yourself, how exactly does one seek to stop the spending on a bankrupt ideology WITHOUT addressing it, WITHOUT pointing out its flaws, and WITHOUT stopping it dead in its tracks?

Are you really so naive as to suggest our best chance of victory entails sacrificing the promotion of a conservative ideology?

Think about what you are promoting -a successful defeat! You seem ONLY interested in gaining power -just like the enemy now in 1600 Pennsylavania Avenue.

Obama the king is gone, all hail king Romney -long live the spendthrift king -- LOL!!!!

Get a clue or step aside.

44 posted on 05/10/2012 6:57:52 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thanks for the ping!


45 posted on 05/10/2012 8:59:00 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Are you really so naive as to suggest our best chance of victory entails sacrificing the promotion of a conservative ideology?

I never said anything even remotely close to what you suggest.

Get a life.

Everything I listed are red herrings thrown out by the Obama administration. There is no GOP war on women and the President has absolutely no voice on issues such as gay marriage.

Responding to red herrings is beyond stupid.

46 posted on 05/11/2012 5:36:31 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
Everything I listed are red herrings thrown out by the Obama administration. There is no GOP war on women and the President has absolutely no voice on issues such as gay marriage.

You did not respond to the details of my posting -instead calling it a red herring...

-here is a portion reposted, followed by a supplemental with the hope that I might clue you in.

Anyone can point to a deficit; however, leadership requires pointing out the cause and to some degree greater than spending too much. The cause of spending too much is a big government that imposes it sense of morality upon the people. It is a government religion that seeks to impose all manners of 'justice' that we as conservatives are fighting against!

So ask yourself, how exactly does one seek to stop the spending on a bankrupt ideology WITHOUT addressing it, WITHOUT pointing out its flaws, and WITHOUT stopping it dead in its tracks?

NOW you claim the President has no voice on issues such as gay marriage? I beg to disagree with some facts. The President via his administration has and is interpreting policy, issuing executive orders, and subjectively and selectively enforcing laws to accomplish the following:

1. Marriage comparable benefits for homosexual sex couples where one of the disordered perverts is federally employed...

2. The US State Department is promoting a homosexual sex premised "Rainbow Spring" around the world seeking "orifice diversity" and "orientation justice"...

3. The US State Department is promoting abortion and birth control under the premise of woman's health, violence prevention, and gender justice...

4. Health care services such as abortion and birth control under the premise of woman's health are being funded under new administration interpretations and policies regarding health care...

In essence, a morally devoid government religion is being imposed upon the people and the people are being forced to pay for it and you think that is just fine -no big deal -a red herring?

LOL!!!! I hate to ruin your day and point out your conservativeness is really a fallacy. Even IF as you claim, the economy e.g. fiscal matters are paramount THEN you could at least acknowledge that all these government imposed moral justices COST MONEY. --But no, YOU instead sound like either a Libertarian or a RINO... You either support government funding and promotion of justice perverted or you opposes it. There is no in between!

47 posted on 05/11/2012 8:54:26 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
You did not respond to the details of my posting -instead calling it a red herring

I never called anything you said a red herring.

It is obvious you are better at talking than reading.

There is no reason for you to respond, as I am too busy to read your trite gibberish.

48 posted on 05/12/2012 6:48:14 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
There is no reason for you to respond, as I am too busy to read your trite gibberish.

It would seem that your mind is made up that the state of our economy is disconnected completely from the morally bankrupt ideology government imposes upon the people...

In essence, talking about the economy e.g. "it's the economy dummy" is all talk and no walk UNLESS one confronts the reason government spends and then decides which spending is legitimate versus illegitimate -the decision to spend or not spend, fund or not fund SHOULD be premised upon the law and the moral and inalienable principles our country was founded upon -NOT premised upon mob rules whether it be our mob or theirs.

True conservatives understand that a republican RINO collective is as much a danger to individual freedom as a democrat collective is. All these supposed non issues are the reason the economy is where it is today -the economy is but a symptom of an all to powerful government that imposing a bankrupt ideology upon the people.

My gibberish will continue REGARDLESS and RINOs comprehend it...

49 posted on 05/12/2012 2:38:24 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson