Skip to comments.
Iranian naval admiral: ‘If needed, we can move to within three miles of New York’
The Daily Caller ^
Posted on 04/28/2012 7:39:01 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50, 51-92 last
To: Sub-Driver
Iranian naval admiral: If needed, we can move to within three miles of New York First, there was Baghdad Bob. What do we call this guy, Teheran Tom?
51
posted on
04/28/2012 11:45:40 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(California, where English is a foreign language)
To: paolop
52
posted on
04/28/2012 11:50:16 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: Chainmail
Ya know, my initial comment (at #15) mentioned "balloon" exactly once. And it also mentioned "missile" exactly once. You latched on to the "balloon" and beat it to death. Now you are saying that Iran has missiles and that Iran could adapt these to a naval platform.
Gee, maybe that's a lot like what I was saying at #15. You COULD have responded "I think your balloon comment is harebrained, but you may have a point about the missile". Nut "Noooooooooooooooo". You had to repeatedly tell me that I needed to educate myself.
I say (again) I'm concerned about Iran, and nukes, and their statement that they can get darn close to NYC. That's pretty much all I've been trying to say. You either have concerns about that, or you don't.
53
posted on
04/28/2012 12:25:32 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
To: Nowhere Man
Compared to Barry Soetoro Hussein, even Bill Clinton in a high school band uniform looks sharp. Yeah, Bill Clinton blew a sax and Barry Soetoro blows a .... a, well, you know.
54
posted on
04/28/2012 12:30:21 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Chainmail
I was just correcting you. You specifically stated “Even advanced Nuclear warheads weigh well over a ton” which is incorrect.
To: RC2
We have a 3 mile limit and a 12 mile limit. Whats the difference between the two? 9 miles? (I couldn't help myself...)
Regards,
GtG
56
posted on
04/28/2012 2:34:02 PM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: Sub-Driver
57
posted on
04/28/2012 2:41:53 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(We will have to go through hell to get out of hell. Signed, a fanatic)
To: Chainmail
2. Balloons don't get to the altitudes necessary for an EMP to be generated which are well above the stratosphere. That may be correct for nuclear devices but EMP generators have been demonstrated at ground level using conventional explosives, magnets, and copper wire. EMP is phenomenon not limited to nuclear devices.
Respects,
GtG
58
posted on
04/28/2012 2:49:29 PM PDT
by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: RC2
59
posted on
04/28/2012 2:58:01 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: Sub-Driver

We'll take hull shots, then sink your ass. Bank on it.
60
posted on
04/28/2012 3:08:05 PM PDT
by
Wizdum
(My job is to get you to shoot soda out your nose)
To: Windflier
Yeah, Bill Clinton blew a sax and Barry Soetoro blows a .... a, well, you know.
I'll keep it clean but to the point, Barry Soetoro Hussein blows goats.
61
posted on
04/28/2012 3:08:28 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
To: Wizdum
62
posted on
04/28/2012 3:08:53 PM PDT
by
Wizdum
(My job is to get you to shoot soda out your nose)
To: Sub-Driver
63
posted on
04/28/2012 3:10:07 PM PDT
by
tomkat
(para bellum)
To: Chainmail
I think EMP is too overrated and we tend to turn it into something out of a 1970's era Irwin Allen disaster movie. If we got hit with EMP, most cars, even ones made post 1985 will start, most transistor radios will till work and even many electronic devices will survive. The real MacGuffin is the damage to our power generating and distribution system, even then, not all of it will be damaged, you might see "islanding" here and here, but since we all depend on it, it sucks to be you if you're power is out for a long time. Again, your car will still run, there is a 90/95 percent chance but unless you have a generator, a 12 volt pump or a hand pump, lotsa luck in getting fuel for it.
EMP is more like a 500 lbs gorilla than an 800 lbs one, but in some way, it can be overcome, albeit with some difficulty. As an amateur radio operator, this interests me a lot.
64
posted on
04/28/2012 3:17:41 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
To: Nowhere Man
Greetings Nowhere Man, et al:
On one hand, MILSPEC EMP specifications are likely written by DOD professionals to unimaginable CYA standards. On the other hand, consumer device specifications are written by electrical engineers complying with both FCC electromagnetic noise standards and a more important protection of the consumer brand name intergity.
EMP is electromagnetic noise. My understanding of EMP vulnerablity is an inadequately shielded electronic device may fuse open and/or closed unexpectedly from the sudden induced flow of electrons. So I often wondered if the simple metal electric cabinets which the grid switchgear protection devices actually reside within are adequate EMP protection.
In many cases, sloppy install jobs and/or unprofessional repairs render the electromagnetic protection shield non-functionable. Which may explain an occasional electric grid failure during a solar flare event.
An EMP will necessarily trip overvoltage/undervoltage and overcurrent protection relays plus lockout relays grid wide. Just as the transmission line failure caused in summer 2003; a grid reset and restart will take some time.
This EMP talk makes me believe another crony-capitalist company, such as GE, is only trying to hyperpanic sell the USA upon unnecessary EMP protection. Yeah, all this “green energy” propaganda “for the children” makes me very skeptical.
Cheers,
OLA
65
posted on
04/29/2012 2:28:12 AM PDT
by
OneLoyalAmerican
(In God I trust, all others provide citations.)
To: sean327
Greetings sean327:
Everything electrical/electronic will be rendered useless.
Everything? Kindly provide a source for that information.
Cheers,
OLA
66
posted on
04/29/2012 2:34:10 AM PDT
by
OneLoyalAmerican
(In God I trust, all others provide citations.)
To: bravo whiskey
as someone said, don;t need a weather balloon just a container ship or big a supertanker sitting off singapore and use it to launch small submersibles like the drug cartels are using. as a student of naval warfare i have always wondered why navies build what they build. any supertanker could be easliy converted to helicpter operations or ssm platforms given how easy it is with modules. armor up the superstructure and engine area which, being larger, tends to attract asms. a hull that size can take numerous hits and stay afloat. cheap , expendable, and huge stike capability.
I'd love to read your treatise on capital ships.
/s
To: anoldafvet
Yep...Obama aint no Reagan...he might allow them to dock in New York
68
posted on
04/29/2012 4:07:57 AM PDT
by
Yorlik803
(better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
To: ClearCase_guy
What would keep them from shipping a weapon directly into the harbor on a container ship that originated in a friendly country? I know we are supposed to have ways to find such weapons after they are here, but that would be too late. I don’t know what safeguards are in place to prevent this, Just asking.I see shipping containers sitting on trucks and trains everywhere here, if it is like that in other places in the world, a truck and a forklift would be all that would be needed to substitute a container, or add one.
69
posted on
04/29/2012 5:13:03 AM PDT
by
Quickgun
(Second Amendment. The only one you can put your hands on.)
To: ClearCase_guy
1. Yes, it is impossible to make a weather balloon lift a ton of payload.
2. Yes, an EMP pulse weapon cannot be effectively discharged at ground level.
The EMP thing is hyperbole. Hundreds of nukes have been tested above-ground and somehow the Soviet and American grids survived. Much ado about nothing, IMHO.
70
posted on
04/29/2012 5:39:04 AM PDT
by
dinodino
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
71
posted on
04/29/2012 5:53:33 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: RobinOfKingston
“Iranian naval admiral”
Like, uh, what other kind of admiral is there?
Land Admiral? Admiral in the Swiss Navy?
There really was a Hungarian Admiral (Horthy) but he belonged to the Austro-Hungarian imperial navy.
Anyway..... just more Iranian bloviating, except that the moron in the WH is emboldening them more & more. That’s the real danger.
72
posted on
04/29/2012 6:25:47 AM PDT
by
elcid1970
(Nuke the Aswan High Dam, then nuke Mecca. Death to Islam means freedom for all mankind.")
To: Monty22002
I'm not necessarily disputing, but it has taken 70 years of constant testing and development to shrink an atomic delivery package down to those dimensions, and be reasonably sure that, when the button is pushed, there isn't just a blue glow and a violently radioactive puddle of melted plutonium. Or worse, a loud bang and bits of shattered reactive mass all over the place.
I'm not saying they can't do it, but this is the same country that accused us of sending them faulty cars, because one flipped over and a 7th century engineer noticed that there was no separate chassis. (Unibody construction having been missed.)
73
posted on
04/29/2012 6:44:07 AM PDT
by
jonascord
(Any Democrat = Classic examples of the Downing Effect.)
To: EGPWS
You know, if we could use their ships as affordable studio apartments we might just have a use for Iran.
74
posted on
04/29/2012 7:03:56 AM PDT
by
Volunteer
(Though I know that the hypnotized never lie, do ya? - The Who)
To: Volunteer
Awesome! It’s nice for Iran to donate material for an artificial reef 3 miles out. This will be good for fishing. And Iranian sailors probably don’t taste all that much different to crabs than the mob snitches they normally dine upon.
75
posted on
04/29/2012 7:15:11 AM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(Sofa King Mitt Odd Did Obamneycare)
To: Sub-Driver
I’m sure they can. And I’m sure that if needed, they can provide minerals and nutrients for little fishies swimming three miles off shore from New York.
76
posted on
04/29/2012 7:37:42 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: anoldafvet
Even Obama has to stop short of outright treason, and can’t prove himself such a coward that he loses reelection or his party loses midterms.
77
posted on
04/29/2012 7:39:48 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: svcw
They invaded. They got mugged. They kept telling those kids to turn the radio down. They couldn’t find a cab. They got lost on the subway. They got ripped off at three-card monty. Somebody told them to rendezvous at the Blue Oyster. They stole some souveniers from a Korean vendor and got kicked in the face. They fled.
78
posted on
04/29/2012 7:45:08 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Diogenesis
Priceless! That graphic alone could win the election without a word spoken.
Perfect for the ROMNEY socialist camp, since he offers nothing verbal that he hasn’t flipped on, and he’s got that socialist record of his, so therefore he is dead in the water every time he opens his mouth, but for a campaign based entirely on “rah rah”, for the useful idiots among us.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
79
posted on
04/29/2012 8:25:17 AM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Nevermind, Newt. Forget the convention. I'm trusting God for the rest.)
To: Chainmail
Build them? No need. Iran probably has one or more ex-Soviet nukes, one of the not small number that were ‘lost’ after the Soviet empire collapsed.
80
posted on
04/29/2012 9:09:01 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: dinodino
Back when we were testing above ground, most stuff was vacuum-tube based. Vacuum tube gear is pretty much impervious to EMP. Transistorized gear and computer gear, not so much.
81
posted on
04/29/2012 9:10:21 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Sub-Driver
82
posted on
04/29/2012 9:13:12 AM PDT
by
PMAS
(ABO 2012)
To: OneLoyalAmerican
Anything that hasn’t been EMP/EMI hardened will be fryed. I can’t get into details, but I have been involved in EMP/EMI testing for DOD programs I have worked on. If it ain’t hardened it’s toast.
83
posted on
04/29/2012 9:22:54 AM PDT
by
sean327
(God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
To: OneLoyalAmerican
Also in the case of cars, even though they are run by computers, they are designed to run under rough conditions, heat, cold, high RF environment and so on so perhaps there is a way they can handle EMP as well. I’m into auto parts so I generally know what car parts go through.
84
posted on
04/29/2012 2:04:56 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Knock me over with a feather, the Atlantic *is* at least three miles deep, so, he ain't lying. Thanks Sub-Driver.

85
posted on
04/29/2012 3:52:26 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: sean327
Greetings sean327:
Understand. Just looking for open source factual.
Cheers,
OLA
86
posted on
04/29/2012 10:59:10 PM PDT
by
OneLoyalAmerican
(In God I trust, all others provide citations.)
To: Sub-Driver

Right. I'll get the surrender papers ready.
To: OneLoyalAmerican
Not a problem. There is plenty of info out there that isn’t classified. Most of it explains the science behind EMP/EMI.
Many electronics text books go into good detail.
88
posted on
04/30/2012 10:16:02 AM PDT
by
sean327
(God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
To: Billthedrill
Very nice! Thanks for the laugh.
89
posted on
04/30/2012 4:05:25 PM PDT
by
definitelynotaliberal
(Nov. 6, 2012 - And the correct answer is no one is entitled to a bailout.)
To: SunkenCiv
A little known fact is that where the Mid-Atlantic Ridge crosses Iceland, it spews people instead of lava.

Mega large pic for detail.
To: Sub-Driver
Iranian, U.S. naval admiral: If needed, we can move to within three miles of New York downtown Terhan
To: Rebelbase
92
posted on
05/01/2012 4:59:41 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50, 51-92 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson