Skip to comments.FULL Video of Apuzzo Ballot Challenge Hearing
Posted on 04/11/2012 9:16:29 PM PDT by jdirt
The Judges are making up the rules and evidence as they go. If you can't fight fair, they cheat. Read the ruling and listen to repatriate radio for a discussion of the hearing with Cmdr. Kerchner.
ONLY THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T MAKE THE CONNECTION THAT QUALIFICATIONS ARE INSTITUTED TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE ARE QUALIFIED. APPARENTLY ONLY CITIZENS CAN SEE THAT.
Any news from today’s hearing?
Video of the hearing:
Watching it now.
At 15:15 the lady judge asks what New Jersey law requires the candidate to prove his eligibility.
Would you add your ping list, please?
One of the judges says leave it up to congress or the electoral college to vet the President Elect.
Like that’s going to happen.
thanks for the ping...
Thanks.. Viewing later.
Appreciate the ping. Sadly, all three judges were focused upon one thing, and one thing only, how could they dismiss the process and kick the can down the road. Not one of the three was going to render a ruling which would be ‘quoteable’ in future hearings. These three are representative of what our judicial system has become, a gaggle of black-robed oligarchs who use their power to further an unConstitutional realm where their robed colleagues retain ultimate power by fiat rather than the actual written law.
although i haven’t checked NJ, the oaths of office in most states require its governors to swear to uphold the constitution of the state along with the Constitution of the United States
therefore, it is the responsibility of the governor of every state to insure candidates appearing on the ballot presented to the states citizens are in fact, Constitutionally eligible. if they are not, then a fraud is being presented to the people as legitimate... thereby perpetuating the fraud by the state govt
you can tell by the questions being asked by the judges which side they are biased towards
it’s hilarious to think the only time to insure the validity of a candidate is after they’ve been elected.
that is patently absurd
and to think that the state has no say in the validity of a candidate presented to its citizens is to make the states irrelevant.
if the states are irrelevant, then why are the votes of the citizens within the states required at all?
The judges look (and act) like something out of a Dilbert comic strip.
As long as they are “kicking the can” up to the next judicial level it’s just SOP. Only government body that can rule on it is the SCOTUS.
The pirate Roberts court has already given a clearance to the little bastard commie, indicating they will not address the issues, as if there really are no issues to address. THAT is treachery.
‘erfidy’ should be P E R F I D Y. Time for a mug of tea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.