Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FULL Video of Apuzzo Ballot Challenge Hearing
http://www.youtube.com/haggz51 ^ | April 11, 2012 | Haggz51

Posted on 04/11/2012 9:16:29 PM PDT by jdirt

The Judges are making up the rules and evidence as they go. If you can't fight fair, they cheat. Read the ruling and listen to repatriate radio for a discussion of the hearing with Cmdr. Kerchner.

ONLY THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T MAKE THE CONNECTION THAT QUALIFICATIONS ARE INSTITUTED TO MAKE SURE PEOPLE ARE QUALIFIED. APPARENTLY ONLY CITIZENS CAN SEE THAT.

http://www.youtube.com/haggz51


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: ballot; challenge; eligibility; naturalborncitizen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2012 9:16:40 PM PDT by jdirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdirt

ping


2 posted on 04/12/2012 3:52:00 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

self ping


3 posted on 04/12/2012 6:18:42 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdirt

Any news from today’s hearing?

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/


4 posted on 05/30/2012 1:09:50 PM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

Video of the hearing:

http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/exclusive-video-atty-apuzzo-purpura-moran-v-obama-appeal-hearing-30-may-2012-trenton-nj/

Watching it now.


5 posted on 05/31/2012 12:11:13 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

At 15:15 the lady judge asks what New Jersey law requires the candidate to prove his eligibility.


6 posted on 05/31/2012 12:15:59 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP; butterdezillion

Nellie:

Would you add your ping list, please?

Thanks


7 posted on 05/31/2012 12:26:42 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

One of the judges says leave it up to congress or the electoral college to vet the President Elect.

Like that’s going to happen.


8 posted on 05/31/2012 12:38:26 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike; TheCipher; little jeremiah; bitt; STARWISE; onyx; edge919; Fantasywriter; ...

ping


9 posted on 05/31/2012 5:37:32 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike; TheCipher; little jeremiah; bitt; STARWISE; onyx; edge919; Fantasywriter; ...

ping


10 posted on 05/31/2012 5:38:45 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

thanks for the ping...


11 posted on 05/31/2012 6:07:23 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jdirt

Thanks.. Viewing later.


12 posted on 05/31/2012 6:47:42 AM PDT by Broker (Matthew 5:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Appreciate the ping. Sadly, all three judges were focused upon one thing, and one thing only, how could they dismiss the process and kick the can down the road. Not one of the three was going to render a ruling which would be ‘quoteable’ in future hearings. These three are representative of what our judicial system has become, a gaggle of black-robed oligarchs who use their power to further an unConstitutional realm where their robed colleagues retain ultimate power by fiat rather than the actual written law.


13 posted on 05/31/2012 8:01:58 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

I would add that it is quite revealing how the opposition to Apuzzo/Kirchner argued that no state election oversight applies where the office of president is involved because it is the electoral college and congress which has the oversight responsibility ... a more blatant attempt to usurp states rights could not be exposed! The election process is governed by jackals and thieves and professional liars who the feckless pubbies will not oppose and for whom the criminal enterprise democrats search in order to raise them to positions of power. Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, and Goofy (did you see that mess of tinted hair on that gal?) did what their masters ordered, they rendered the process a farce and removed the states rights from New Jersey residents, and they did it openly with malice of forethought.
14 posted on 05/31/2012 8:14:03 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

although i haven’t checked NJ, the oaths of office in most states require its governors to swear to uphold the constitution of the state along with the Constitution of the United States

therefore, it is the responsibility of the governor of every state to insure candidates appearing on the ballot presented to the states citizens are in fact, Constitutionally eligible. if they are not, then a fraud is being presented to the people as legitimate... thereby perpetuating the fraud by the state govt


15 posted on 05/31/2012 8:25:53 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

you can tell by the questions being asked by the judges which side they are biased towards

it’s hilarious to think the only time to insure the validity of a candidate is after they’ve been elected.

that is patently absurd

and to think that the state has no say in the validity of a candidate presented to its citizens is to make the states irrelevant.

if the states are irrelevant, then why are the votes of the citizens within the states required at all?


16 posted on 05/31/2012 8:49:23 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sten

The judges look (and act) like something out of a Dilbert comic strip.


17 posted on 05/31/2012 9:07:19 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

As long as they are “kicking the can” up to the next judicial level it’s just SOP. Only government body that can rule on it is the SCOTUS.


18 posted on 05/31/2012 9:15:51 AM PDT by hoosiermama ( Obama: " born in Kenya."..Is he lying now or lying then?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
There is a major diff from SOP ... so far three states have disenfranchised their residents by asserting the vetting of presidential candidates is beyond state jurisdiction. This court has done the same thing, though the media description of this erfidy will be comepletely different and as usual, dishonest.

The pirate Roberts court has already given a clearance to the little bastard commie, indicating they will not address the issues, as if there really are no issues to address. THAT is treachery.

19 posted on 05/31/2012 9:25:15 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

‘erfidy’ should be P E R F I D Y. Time for a mug of tea.


20 posted on 05/31/2012 9:26:47 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson