Posted on 04/05/2012 5:17:54 AM PDT by scottfactor
Of course we should not be surprised at anything that comes out of his mouth, but comments this week by Barack Obama (or whatever his name is) were simply stunning. Not only were they stunning, but they were chilling. When he issued a thinly veiled threat to the Supreme Court concerning their ruling on the atrocious Obamacare legislation, we saw a brazen, boorish, wanna-be dictator showing his ugly, arrogant face.
Here is part of what he said,
“Ultimately, I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress. And I’d just remind conservative commentators that for years what we’ve heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint — that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well, this is a good example. And I’m pretty confident that this Court will recognize that and not take that step.”
Lies. There is nothing “unprecedented” about the Supreme Court overturning unconstitutional legislation. They have been doing it for over 200 years. He lies about the definition of “judicial activism.” Judicial activism is a very real problem in our nation, and it has been a problem for many years now. Judicial activism occurs when judges depart from constitutional law and create new laws contrary to the Constitution, and that happens all too often. Judges who uphold the Constitution are not judicial activists, but of course, Obama never lets the truth get in the way of his outrageous assertions.
Speaking of outrageous assertions, did you hear what Obama said about the Paul Ryan GOP budget?
As reported by Real Clear Politics,
“We wouldn't have the capacity to enforce the laws that protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, or the food that we eat. Cuts to the FAA would likely result in more flight cancellations, delays and the complete elimination of air traffic control services in parts of the country. Over time, our weather forecasts would become less accurate because we wouldn't be able to afford to launch new satellites and that means governors and mayors would have to wait longer to order evacuations in the event of a hurricane. That's just a partial sampling of the consequences of this budget.”
This is simply breathtaking. This man has never met a lie he is not willing to tell. Absolutely nothing in that statement is true. There is no government agency or program that could not stand budget cuts—even huge budget cuts. If we could truly analyze the waste and redundancy and then eliminate them, we would be amazed at the money we could save while still having good weather forecasting, air traffic control services and air, food and water safety. Give me a break, Obama! He sounds desperate.
But, is he really desperate? When you consider the hot-mic, “after my election, I will have more flexibility” remarks he recently made to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, it would seem that Obama is quite confident that he will be “reelected.”
We may wonder how he can be so sure of himself. There is no doubt that Obama is unpopular, despite the “polling results” being constantly released by Obama-fawning media outlets that show close to half the nation approves of his terrible, treasonous performance in office.
I understand that there are plenty of uninformed or otherwise ignorant people in America who do not have the slightest clue about what the communist Obama administration has been doing since January of 2009, but many, many millions more have been jarred wide awake in the past few years and are watching closely as this man and his fellow travelers in Congress and his administration systematically destroy our economy, our military, our freedoms and our Constitution. Now, this process has been going on bit by bit for many decades, but we have never seen such an acceleration of it as we have seen under Obama.
I do not believe for a minute that Obama could re-take the presidency in an honest election. Without massive election fraud, it simply is not possible. When you consider the fact that a glaring majority of Americans oppose the government takeover of the health care industry and the forcing of all Americans to buy health insurance, how can you believe that many of them also support Obama for reelection? If 60 to 75 percent of the nation wants nothing to do with Obamacare, I find it hard to believe that a third to a half of those people want anything to do with Obama being reelected, unless they somehow stupidly do not associate Obama with his “signature” legislation.
We already see the stage being set for widespread election fraud. You have the Obama “Justice” Department fighting like deranged thugs to prevent states from enacting common-sense voter identification laws. The Democrats are so desperate to stop voter ID, that they are even waging a boycott of Coca-Cola and Walmart for those companies’ support of voter ID laws—all the more reason to shop at Walmart and buy Coca-Cola!
We also see the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) working feverishly to implement stealth amnesty for illegal aliens by granting certain illegals so-called “unlawful presence waivers” for those criminal aliens who can prove they have an American citizen relative. The DHS has been steadily hustling to grant amnesty to illegal aliens since Obama took office.
As Judicial Watch reported on Monday,
“This appears to be part of the Obama Administration’s bigger plan to blow off Congress by using its executive powers to grant illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty. The plan has been in the works for years and in 2010 Texas’s largest newspaper published an exposé about a then-secret DHS initiative that systematically cancelled pending deportations. The remarkable program stunned the legal profession and baffled immigration attorneys who said the government bounced their clients’ deportation even when expulsion was virtually guaranteed.
In late 2011 a mainstream newspaper obtained internal Homeland Security documents outlining “sweeping changes” in immigration enforcement that halt the deportation of illegal aliens with no criminal records. This also includes a nationwide “training program” to assure that enforcement agents and prosecuting attorneys don’t remove illegal immigrants who haven’t been convicted of crimes.”
Why all these treasonous efforts by the Obama regime? For millions more fraudulent Democrat votes, of course. These people from south of the border are already acquainted with socialism, and they bring that ready-made, Democrat mindset to our country.
In addition to the enabling of the illegal alien invasion and the war against voter ID laws by this despicable administration, we also have the very disturbing report out of the Argonne National Laboratory that was featured at Salon.com last fall. Researchers for Obama’s Department of Energy at Argonne demonstrated the amazing ease with which they can remotely hack into voting machines and change the results undetectably. A researcher quoted in the column said he is confident that it can be done on most any voting machine in America. That’s just great!
I also mentioned in a column last month that the United States’ dominant election results reporting company has been sold to an international outfit out of Barcelona. As the website Black Box Voting reported, this move lets the foreign company see our election results before anyone in America sees them, and it also eliminates independently verifiable checks on vote totals. No longer will many American jurisdictions be able to compare locally reported results with the internationally reported results. We will just have to take their word for it.
If Obama “wins” reelection, it will not be in an honest way, and if we think we have seen the worst of Obama’s arrogant, unconstitutional behavior during this first atrocious term, we have another thing coming. If he gets a second term, and there is still no opposition to his dictates from Congress, and if we lose one or more conservative Supreme Court Justices, I shudder to think of what this dictator-in-waiting will do to what remains of our freedoms and Constitution.
BTTT. A very good piece by Ms. Miller.
meant nothing to “O” on inauguration day.... or since!
M O R O N!!
Think of what Schicklgruber would have been like had he gone to Columbia and Harvard. He would have been above marching from the beer hall himself, he would have encouraged others to do so.
The USA has a long tradition of responsible government. A nation of laws, not of men. That tradition is being challenged, day by day. BHO has his willing accomplices in the media, in his party, and overseas. Many of us realized what this man was all about long ago. He signaled his course very early on when the bondholders of GM and Chrysler had their rights expropriated and given to BHO's union buddies by presidential fiat. In a true constitutional republic, impeachment proceedings would have begun shortly after that fiasco.
Also, this week, he told the msm how to report their news on him.
Heil, Usurper!
"Wanna-be" does not belong in that sentence......
Replace him, and America is still the same sick country it was in 2008 when it raised him up. Economic, political and historical ignorance is epidemic.
The statist/socialist are pulling the trigger to soon. The population hasn’t been dumbed down enough to believe the types of lies Obama is spurting out. They are about 20 years to early.
I saved the following quote from a thread on FR just after the election.
"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president"
Absolutely right on....and Romney will only continue in a similar path, albeit at a slower pace.
That being said, I don’t think Romney can beat O.......
The last item alone would have made any other politician a sure loser, but it will fall into the memory hole.
“The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president”
_______________
Do you know who wrote this? It is amazingly good
Well, he has not yet taken our guns nor rounded us up for the gulags or to be "disappeared." I would say he's not quite a full-blown dictator, YET.
It has been widely attributed to a writer in a Czech newspaper:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/will_ignorance_lead_to_a_secon.html
‘There is no government agency or program that could not stand budget cuts—even huge budget cuts.”
Didn’t he promise to root out and cut waste, combine redundant departments to reduce spending and pore over budgets with a fine-toothed comb to prevent unnecessary spending?
Even his own promises “meant nothing to “O” on inauguration day.... or since!”
“When he issued a thinly veiled threat to the Supreme Court concerning their ruling on the atrocious Obamacare legislation, we saw a brazen, boorish, wanna-be dictator showing his ugly, arrogant face.”
Fifth Circuit Court saw it too and now Barry is having to write on the blackboard 500 times “ The Federal Court does have the power to strike down Congressional legislation”.
Thank you, WXRGina. I will add that information next to the quote in my files.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.