Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt is a Flincher, Newt is a Clincher ( Vanity )
GraceG

Posted on 03/17/2012 10:52:09 PM PDT by GraceG

The Problem as I see it with Romney is that he will be such a mediocre President that even if he does win he will be so middle of the road as to “not upset the apple cart” that the economy will not bloom and then in 4 years it will assure that the democrats take back power on the whole meme that the “economy didn’t recover”.

Not to mention any GOP president is going to be so damned hated no matter how “moderate” they are. Mittens will get so damned gun shy that he will be ineffective and the MSM and the Democrat controlled media will smell blood and keep attacking him even as he retreats and this will paralyze him to what needs to be done to restore the economy and defuse all of Obama’s horrible regulatory actions.

Newt is going to be hated like hell anyways and HE KNOWS THAT, but he also knows that he will have the people who put him there behind even if the Media doesn’t paint it that way every night at 5:00pm.

So therefore, Newt (who thrives on antagonism instead of flinching from it) will take the bold measures to recover the economy despite being thrashed every night on the MSM news channels. In Four years the MSM will be flabbergasted like their were on election night in 1984, because the man on the street will notice the economy improvement.

Mitt is a Flincher, Newt is a Clincher

Definition of a Clincher:

a decisive fact, argument, act, or remark

Definition of a Flincher:

to withdraw or shrink from or as if from pain

We are so SOL if Either Mittens gets in or Barry gets a second term.

Mittens would only slow things down and then in four years the GOP would be blamed so much but with little to show we would still be in an economic malaise the likes of Carter’s worst dreams. This would GUARANTEE a Democrat Victory over the house the senate and even the presidency in 2016. They would not be pulling any punches as they would run someone that would make Obama look like a middle of the road moderate. Because they know they would have a very good chance of winning. Not to mention the class warfare game that could be played to Bolshevik conclusion during that election if we get Romney and mediocre performance out of him which is very much likely.

Of course Obama winning would be a very much “nothing to lose” second term that would see him likely either completely destroying the economy so badly that they play the game of “Destroy and Support” in that they would destroy the economy and then support the people as the “great savior” thus ensuring either “Glorious Revolution” or the mass construction project of making millions more so dependent that they will have a permanent grip on power that would only come undone with Blood sweat and tears, but mostly Blood and Tears.

ABO and ABR, because we really need Newt or maybe Santorum if we get desperate, heck I would even take, heaven forbid (I can't believe I am saying this), Ron Paul over Romney for the reasons above.

So I repeat once more: Newt is the Clincher, and Mitt is the Flincher.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: gingrich; kenyanbornmuzzie; mitt; mittromney; newt; newtgingrich; ricksantorum; romney

1 posted on 03/17/2012 10:52:14 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I have never seen the political establishment try to push a candidate down the throats of an unwilling electorate as this.


2 posted on 03/17/2012 10:59:33 PM PDT by freedomrings69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Newt.org = The Candidate of Substance & Real Solutions!

3 posted on 03/17/2012 11:02:16 PM PDT by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
An even worse situation: Mittens (aka Zer0-lite) will renege on repeal of ObamaCare (and just about everything else he's promised).

Mittens is an East Coast LIBERAL Pubbie. He doesn't believe in rocking the boat and doing the real reforms that must be done. Everything will be half-hearted, half-assed, or not done at all. He will keep on the Big Government course and continue to spend and tax — only not as bad as Zer0.

4 posted on 03/17/2012 11:16:24 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
Good analysis. Right on target.

Mr. Newt's bold and courageous ideas give us hope that America can be great again. I simply don't get that feeling of hope from Santorum or Romney. As for Romney, how can a man who has been running for president 7+ years, and that has spent God only knows how much money, can be in the shape he is? Money will not buy this election.

WE THE PEOPLE will make this choice this time around! God is on our side and my faith in God tells me he has a plan. Mr. Newt is part of that plan.

5 posted on 03/17/2012 11:27:34 PM PDT by Bobbisox (All American Conservative Mama Grizzly (MR. NEWT - 2012)(MS. SARAH - 2020))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomrings69

[ I have never seen the political establishment try to push a candidate down the throats of an unwilling electorate as this. ]

We are playing checkers they are playing chess... This is why Romney is being shoved down our throats.

No matter how many pieces we take to the other side and get kinged it will not matter if they can only move like pawns.


6 posted on 03/17/2012 11:54:00 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Being a marginal flincher is about the kindest thing one could say about Mitt


7 posted on 03/18/2012 12:32:07 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I’m afraid you see all too well, Grace, but if worst comes to worst, join me in holding your nose, voting Mitt in, and doing all we can to intimidate him into reasonable governance. Newt would be my choice too, but we might be able to put some tight reins on him.

Barack Hussein has already “ruled” that he can take anything we have if it’s needed for his defense. What will he try to take if given a second term? Our children? He already has some of them near “walking dead” status in our public schools.


8 posted on 03/18/2012 12:55:35 AM PDT by Grampa3711 (Some people bring happiness wherever thet go; others, whenever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa3711

Tight reins on Mitt. Careless with a pronoun. Sorry.


9 posted on 03/18/2012 12:57:32 AM PDT by Grampa3711 (Some people bring happiness wherever thet go; others, whenever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedomrings69

Which is exactly why Mittens is the Libtard choice for Rep candidate. If if they lose, thery win.


10 posted on 03/18/2012 2:03:38 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
So true. I call the Bushes, Dole, McCain, Romney types “placeholders,” as uninspiring men who refused to acknowledge or act on the clear and present danger of a radicalized rat party.

Newt understands the threat the rats present to our republic and freedoms and will happily destroy them.

11 posted on 03/18/2012 2:26:51 AM PDT by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Like the infomercial, everyone hates him this could be a good thing. The rinos and the rats sleep together. Lets upset the apple cart thats what patriots do


12 posted on 03/18/2012 3:12:30 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (B B)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomrings69

I have never seen the political establishment try to push a candidate down the throats of an unwilling electorate as this.

I have; four years ago.


13 posted on 03/18/2012 3:16:09 AM PDT by csmusaret (I have kleptomania, but when it gets too bad I take something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedomrings69
I have never seen the political establishment try to push a candidate down the throats of an unwilling electorate as this.

McCain 2008.

14 posted on 03/18/2012 3:39:56 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

So far, Gingrich hasn’t proven he’s a national candidate, and he’s only won two states thus far.


15 posted on 03/18/2012 3:42:51 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

IMHO in discussing health care, Newt could point out a few of the really bad things about it...gov’t access to your financial records, mandate to buy ins., longer wait periods, fewer services covered. CBO says price of coverage will skyrocket.

Also, when he speaks of firing the unelected regulation-happy czars, Newt should give a few examples...name names and point out backgrounds, experience and philosophies.

Also, why are so many almost anti-American types on board at Homeland Security and elsewhere in the administration?

He’s got to wake people up to the foibles of Obama’s administration. Most people have no clue.


16 posted on 03/18/2012 4:10:22 AM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: IM2MAD

And what about the transparency Obama touted? Never happened.


17 posted on 03/18/2012 4:12:06 AM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Newt is the only way to go, but unfortunately ,there aren’t enough of us.


18 posted on 03/18/2012 4:27:01 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
We need strength in the WH starting in 2013. Someone with a plan, a vision and the experience to “get ‘er done!”

I've long thought that the Obama administration has been leaving sand traps and landmines behind ... just in case Zero loses the election.

We need someone who can maneuver through these and dismantle them as we move back to a Constitutional Republic.

That “someone” is Newt Gingrich!

19 posted on 03/18/2012 4:57:23 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson