Posted on 02/23/2012 8:31:06 AM PST by LastNorwegian
Full title: Sharia in Pennsylvania: Muslim admits to attacking atheist over "Zombie Muhammad"; Muslim judge dismisses case, tells atheist he'd be killed in Muslim lands
This is enforcement of Sharia in a Pennsylvania court. The attacker supposedly got off because he "is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet."
Then, Judge Mark Martin, himself a Muslim, told the atheist, Ernest Perce V.:
“Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society.
Read it all at Jihadwatch
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
what do they have to say about this over at DU?
So ignorance of the law is an excuse if you have an Islamic get out of jail free card.
“what do they have to say about this over at DU?”
Ahhh...the question of the day! What will they say? Absolutely nothing, because they are cowards.
Is this a joke or real?
“what do they have to say about this over at DU?”
I’m not going there and getting “cooties”, but I’ll bet they’re passing out candies and “uluating”.
So sue him in civil court and hurt this character in the pocketbook
How do we get this ruling overturned? We can’t have precedent like this. This is how Britain is being taken over; all it takes is a few precedents from local Muslim areas and the whole system is corrupted.
I am dead serious. How does this ruling get overturned? It is the critical business of every person in this country to see that this ruling gets overturned.
And how do we get this judge impeached or removed from office for violating the oath to protect and defend the US Constitution?
If Muslims are going to be too ignorant of American law to know not to attack/kill/behead “infidels”, then this is justifiable reason for us to refuse to allow Muslims to immigrate here. It would not be an exclusion based on religion but upon the ignorance that is their very “essence”. At least according to what this judge said.
And we just keep on letting these animals into the country like an assembly line : APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED.
So this is how a judge does his job? Just makes it up as he goes along?
So “Your Honor”, would you have approved the Death Penalty?
"I don't think you are aware, sir, there's a big difference between how Americans practice Christianity, I understand you're and atheist, but ssee Islam is not just a religion, it's their culture, their culture, it's their very essence, their very being. They pray five times a day, towards Mecca. To be a good Muslim before you die you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you can not because you are too ill, too elderly, whatever, but you must make the attempt. Their greetings, salam alaikum, wa-laikum as-Salam (is answered by voice), uh, May God be with you. Whenever it is very common their language when they're speaking to each other, ti's very common for them to say, uh, Allah willing, this will happen, it's they are so immersed in it. And what you've don is, you've completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very, very,very, offensive.'Judge' Martin diminished the honor of the black judicial robe of the American courts by equating it's value to the symbolic equivalent of the hefty sack-like trash bag known as the burkah and smothered THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, THE VERY LAW HE WAS SWORN TO UPHOLD ABOVE ALL OTHER LAWS. .. This 'judge' demonstrates and utilized his dual allegiance to opposing legal systems and unilaterally extinguished this atheist's first amendment rights. He must be removed from the bench immediately.I'M A MUSLIM. I FIND IT OFFENSIVE. I FIND WHAT'S ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS [sign] VERY OFFENSIVE. REVERSE OF SIGN SIAID ['only Muhammed can rape America!'] But you have that right, but you are way outside your bounds of First Amendment rights.
As luck would have it, a commenter under the nic "Brandy" posted the following information about this incident at Atlas's thread on this topic:
Pennsylvania judges may be removed in one of two ways:
====================================================================================
I believe this is where to file or send complaints:
Wanda W. Sweigart, Court Administratorwanda.sweigart@pacourts.us
phone: 717-772-3771
The Court of Judicial Discipline of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 5500 P.O. Box 62595, Harrisburg, PA 17106-2595 Phone: (717) 772-3771 • Fax: (717) 772-3774 lan astaslem
Chris Christie would want this judge for SCOTUS
Here’s something the user WhupTdue on Jihadwatch wrote about that:
“A commenter under the nic “Brandy” posted the following information about this incident at Atlas’s thread on this topic:
Pennsylvania judges may be removed in one of two ways:
•The judicial conduct board investigates complaints regarding judicial conduct filed by individuals or initiated by the board. The board determines whether probable cause exists to file formal charges, and presents its case to the court of judicial discipline. The court has the authority to impose sanctions, ranging from a reprimand to removal from office, if the formal charges are sustained.
•Judges may be impeached by the house of representatives and convicted by two thirds of the senate.
I believe this is where to file or send complaints:
Wanda W. Sweigart, Court Administrator
wanda.sweigart@pacourts.us
phone: 717-772-3771
The Court of Judicial Discipline of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania Judicial Center
601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 5500
P.O. Box 62595, Harrisburg, PA 17106-2595
Phone: (717) 772-3771 • Fax: (717) 772-3774
“
I guess Muslims in this country are unique in being allowed to use the George Costanza defense.
Just like Judge Michael Malihi, who ruled that Obama is eligible to be on the Georgia ballot even though there was no probative evidence of eligibility offered and both Obama and his lawyer showed contempt for the court by not showing up.
It was a sharia ruling based on “judge’s knowledge” in Georgia, and this is a blatant sharia ruling in PA as well - not even bothering to hide what it is.
In both instances, credible evidence was simply ignored. “Judge’s knowledge” overruling evidence that actually complies with the judiciary’s evidentiary standards.
Malihi also ignored Supreme Court precedent and instead relied on a non-binding opinion of an Indiana court. I just posted that we cannot allow a precedent like this PA judge’s ruling to stand, because the way Muslims get sharia into free places (such as Britain right now) is by setting precedents in local areas that are easily corrupted, and then having other areas use that precedent.
It’s exactly the same process for getting a stolen identity (like Obama did). You steal a birth certificate number from a dead baby, and then with that forged document you get other documents that are actually genuine. The nation is only as safe as its WEAKEST LINK. And using those weakest links is what Muslims do. They’ve demonstrated it time and time again. Anytime we just poo-pooh a weak link because we all know it’s a corrupt or weak link, we are leaving the door WIDE OPEN for unscrupulous players to take over the whole system.
And the Muslims who believe they have a duty to kill infidels are unscrupulous.
The Islamic world is at war with the west, and we won’t fight back. Today, a Muslim killed US soldiers in Afghanistan because SOMEONE burned a book. The soldiers he killed did not burn the book, but all infidels are deemed deserving of death for the slightest insult by any infidel. These guys are still fighting the war that we (Christians) won against desperate odds 1400 years ago - when the Caliphate was dedicated to enslaving the world. And the funny thing is, we could crush them like bugs if our respect for human life mirrored theirs. The only way they can win this war is if we roll over and give them the victory, and it seems that is exactly what will happen.
If only we would return to our God, and raise Christ as our banner.
Ditto!
Judge Mark Martin Remember that name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.