Skip to comments.Sharia in Pennsylvania: Muslim admits to attacking atheist; Muslim judge dismisses case
Posted on 02/23/2012 8:31:06 AM PST by LastNorwegian
Full title: Sharia in Pennsylvania: Muslim admits to attacking atheist over "Zombie Muhammad"; Muslim judge dismisses case, tells atheist he'd be killed in Muslim lands
This is enforcement of Sharia in a Pennsylvania court. The attacker supposedly got off because he "is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet."
Then, Judge Mark Martin, himself a Muslim, told the atheist, Ernest Perce V.:
Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone elses religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society.
Read it all at Jihadwatch
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
When I read this I had to check if it was satire written by our Freeper friend, John Semmens! ( It's not satire.)
Even DU knows this is horse poop. THAT says a lot.
Come to think of it, if just wanting the behavior to stop is justifiable, then every murder ever committed would have a justifiable intent.
Hey, at least the Muslims who beheaded Daniel Perle (sp?) weren’t trying to harass him - they just wanted his behavior (living) to stop. Their motives were thus pure.... according to this judge.
So.... as long as you go ahead and kill the person who mocks what you believe in your very core, you are justified (according to this judge).
Very, very scary.
I was thinking about that and how Newt said he plans on taking on the judges! Hmmm and that one in Georgia might be the first one.
.As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2. 7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halaal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States).
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris — car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam — Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam” — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
“Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world. And all of us against the infidel. — Leon Uris, “The Haj”...
Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat
I can think of at least one more...
So Mr. Atheist's mistake is that he referenced 'Zombie Mohammad' rather than 'Pedophile Mohammad' ... because he could have made the case for the latter.
Just another case of Judges setting themselves up as 'gods', rather than interpreters of the Law.
Well his worth is more than any of the other candidates. He was the solo candidate to even bring it up. He’s been watching what has been going on in ‘his’ country to WeThePeople.
Here is a page for user reviews of Judge Mark “Sharia” Martin. There is one older review from before this case:
1 Star Rating: Poor
Added insult to injury, unnecessarily.
by emlay at Citysearch
I was called to court on truancy charges. My mother and I had been under the impression that we were assigned a public defender, but once we arrived we found out that they had reviewed the charges and decided we were not eligible. My mom was left to defend herself, having never been in court before; she was a nervous mess. At one point I tried to correct a statement she had made, and Judge Martin held his hand up to silence me. I was not allowed to speak for the remainder of the hearing. After each side had given their argument, Judge Martin instantly gave his verdict of guilty. He took no time to make up his mind; in fact, it seemed he had had it made up from the moment we walked into the room. He explained why he had decided so, bringing up a few points that my mother had already clearly explained during her testimony. It was obvious that he hadn’t been listening. He then proceeded to call my mother a “lame, pathetic” and weak parent, which I found to be a wholly unnecessary comment. He showed no sympathy or empathy, nor did he make any attempt to understand our side of the story. I am appalled at how he made my mother feel, and I found his behavior offensive and unprofessional.
Pros: He appeared to be listening (again, I said “appeared”).
Cons: Didn’t actually listen; made hurtful, inappropriate comments
I so want to send this judge a Koran wrapped in bacon and dipped in lard.
“Ignorantia juris non excusat”
Ignorance of the law does not excuse.
Now that The Marxist-in-Chief has announced his “African-Americans for Obama’’ campaign I’ve no problem refering to him (not here) as an N-word, why not? Between the most divisive , race-baiting president ever, a Mexican-American hate group (La Raza) openly calling for the killing of whites and getting my tax-payer dollars to do this , creeping Sharia law over-taking the court system here(see story on main thread) why pretend we live in a tolerant country? Am I supposed to ‘’turn the other cheek’’ and pretend that all that I just mentioned isn’t happening? That it’s merely ‘’academic/ political debate’’ and that the peoples and groups saying these things don’t really mean what they’re saying? I’ve been a liberal/socialist democrat at one time, I know how they think. This is who they are. F it. I’m taking a page from their book and I’m going to use their tactics against them. God help the next liberal fool I encounter. The war is on and they wanted it.
Apparently now it does.’’ Possession is 9/10’s of the law’’ That’ll be the next one to go.
It's being reported Christie lowered the FLAG again...
IN HONOR OF THE MUSSIE
And the judge mocked the atheist's core belief AND as a citizen of this country. You think the judge is smart enough to understand that or just hell bent on giving 'justice' to one's core belief and not the other?
Looks like we’ll be stuck with him for a while unless he can be impeached...
Magisterial District 09-3-05
Mechanicsburg Borough, Monroe Township, Upper Allen Township
6 Year Term .....Elected November 2011
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.