Posted on 09/24/2011 6:07:07 PM PDT by MrZippy2k
Ok—Is she a lesbian?
If they want ‘marriage ‘ so bad, why don’t they make up their own form of a marriage and leave our ancient marriage tradition alone.
Leave us alone! Go slink on your own turf.
to the curb!
Me too. I'm tired of people pushing marriage around like it means nothing.
Never trust someone with two last names.
We will NOT repeal it!
Bump!
Ping.
Good point. Bound to be a liberal.
Her bein a Republican an all, I just assumed her name defined her as a red whatever instead of a blue whatever,
How about a Queer marriage and
Traditional marriage
I have a neighbor lesbo that was married and had 3 kids.
She divorced and now she can do anything a man can do, speaking physically not sexually. Rides a Harley. No sex change. We couldn’t ask for a better person/neighbor. Right now she’s in Faloosja (sp) working for the government.
In other words, it’s not that I care what sexual preference you have but just don’t push your way of life on me and we’ll get along just fine.
Yeah, she’s a real commie /sarc
Anybody on this thread over the age of 12? Geeeeezzzz....
Yeah, Had to see a photo. My thinking was wrong.
NO, SHE JUST HAS A BUNCH OF HOMOSEXUALS IN HER DISTRICT.
I hope she gets replaced by someone who believes in true marriage.
Ros-Lehtinen sides with the Democrats on many issues of gay rights. Her district includes large LGBT populations in South Beach in Miami Beach and in the Florida Keys. She is currently one of two Republican members of the LGBT Equality Caucus, of which she is a founding member and a vice-chairperson.
Funny thing is that her father is opposed to Castro and she's trying to usher in the same crap in America.
Actually, yes. She is.
No emails to this RINO hog unless you’re from her district.
I’ll financially support anyone who runs against this weasel!
“As Republicans, we are committed to ensure that the federal government play its proper role. Defining marriage is not part of that role,” read her prepared remarks, which she didn’t deliver but released afterward to the press.
I would disagree from the standpoint that there are over 1000 provisions in federal law in which marital status is involved. So she’s fundamentally wrong — the federal government has to have a definition of marriage to determine status for these various provisions under the law.
And if this law repealing DOMA passes, then what? Then the federal government has no definition of marriage? Will each state define marriage on its own? What about future lawsuits to force 50 state same-sex marriage? Will the federal government be compelled to accept any definition of marriage from any state, if there is no definition under federal law?
Just repealing DOMA leaves things very muddled. Which probaby suits the gay activists, as they plan to force this to all 50 states through the courts.
She may be a lez; more likely, though, she has a quear son or something (not trying to start a rumor; but mothers of mohos tend to develop empathy — Stockholm Syndrome dontcha know).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.