Posted on 08/08/2011 6:50:13 AM PDT by tysonbam
The release of Governor and potential presidential candidate Rick Perry's Texas A&M transcript set off a media frenzy this weekend as commentators and columnists feasted on the underwhelming scores.While releases like this make for fun facts and cute analysis it should be asked, "Why should we care?"
College scores can be a great indicator of skill right out of college. They're helpful for getting into graduate school and ascending the ivory tower, and they indicate a student's proficiency in each subject. When evaluating a 61-year-old potential presidential candidate low grades are both meaningless and not uncommon.
George W. Bush joked about being a C student at Yale with a four-year average of 77. The "complex" John Kerry had a four-year average of 76 also at Yale. While Rick Perry, the face of the Texas economy, received a D in principles of economics, Al Gore, the face of global warming, received a D in Natural Sciences his sophomore year and a C-plus in natural sciences his senior year at Harvard. The Washington Post said in 2000, "[Gore's] generally middling college grades at Harvard in fact bear a close resemblance to the corresponding Yale marks of his presidential opponent, George W. Bush."
The point isn't to deride Bush, Kerry, Gore or Perry, but that college transcripts are only a snapshot of a person's life. Transcripts may give you a glimpse of Perry the student but they tell little about Governor Perry.
Drawing conclusions from information almost four decades old is a fool's errand.
It would be just as absurd to assess college students by when they began walking.
It would be nonsensical to observe that Rick Perry earned a D in economics as a democrat while as a Republican governor, Texas has created 37 percent of all-net new jobs in America since the recovery began according to Richard Fisher of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
While we're using old information to draw ridiculous conclusions it should be obvious that Perry is smarter and more driven than the college dropout Bill Gates.
The perversion of Perry's 39-year-old transcript is a manifestation of ivory-tower elitism at its worst.
This pervasive dogma tells us that our measured academic achievement during a four-year period is more important than all our life lessons.
It's absurd considering real world employers rarely care about college grades after a graduate's first job.
In the real world, a college degree quickly becomes nothing more than a checkmark among more important items like work history and special skills.
This dogma would have us believe Rick Perry's D in Shakespeare is more relevant than a record consisting of years as a state legislator, agriculture commissioner, lieutenant governor, and almost a decade as governor.
This dogma implies that Rick Perry's C in gym matters more than issues like Gardasil, the Trans-Texas corridor and the seven solutions for higher education.
This culture of elitism is the reason every administration has a parade of eggheads running back and forth between Washington, D.C. and the ivory tower. These experts and policy wonks are evaluated on academics by academics more often than on unemployment rates and economic growth.
That's not to say we don't need eggheads and policy wonks, every politician has them, but when evaluating a leader, an F in organic chemistry is far less important than the decisions made after graduation.
As the longest-serving current governor of the second-largest state economy, Perry has relevant points of criticism. His college transcript is not one of them.
Translation: Don’t ask to see Obama’s transcripts.
It would be interesting to compare Perry’s transcript with Obama’s....oh, we cannot see his? Nevermind.
It would be interesting to compare Perry’s transcript with Obama’s....oh, we cannot see his? Nevermind.
That is an apt translation. The reason they prefer we not look at the transcript behind the curtain is that it will reveal the a shallow intellect and a lax attitude, and not the disciplined genius depicted in the mythology.
The excerpt posted argues that accomplishments since graduation are a better measure. Since Obama has no real accomplishments yet, his college grades should be an issue still.
it would be interesting but Obama’s transcripts are just as irrelevant as Perry’s. Obama did graduate magna cum laude putting him in the top ten percent which goes to show, do we really care if the most anti-jobs president in American history did well in the ivory tower?
OK game on
any GOP candidate’s transcripts are meaningless unless compared to obama’s
waiting waiting
(crickets)
I daresay Obama’s transcripts would be very enlightening ... otherwise why would they be so well hidden???
no Obama’s grades are not an issue at all. That he has accomplished nothing since college would be the best way to measure the man. To go back to his college record is to go back to the last time he actually did anything.
FReepers
Please chime in at The Batts site for the HUGE OMISSION of
comparing Obama transcripts to the other candidates.
How do you he graduate magna cum laude?
Obamaâs transcripts are hidden because he attend college as a foreign student âBerry Sotoreo from Indonesiaâ?
That being said, the news is all clucking about his released transcripts and he hasn't even joined the race yet.
The same media elected ObaMao and still hasn't even dare ask to see his transcripts.
The reason that Obama’s transcripts are of a significantly greater import than other politicians is simply the fact that the media-created meme (enhanced by lib pols at every possible turn) is that this man is the most brilliant, erudite, intellectual, MENSA-personified individual ever to occupy the hallowed grounds of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. I agree with all the posts here that are postulating that The One’s transcripts (if we ever saw them) would be in complete concordance with his job performance - ie, failing grades pumped up only by the strong current of Ivy league racial preferences/politics. With our Narcissist/Megalomaniac-in-Chief surrounded by the sycophantic liberal media (Pyongyang’s 4th estate members are probably embarrassed by the ass-kissing of our modern media!), one can be absolutely certain that, had The One’s grades been stellar, they would have been publicized daily throughout the country, held up as a paragon of achievement to our youth, and utilized to bludgeon the arguments and ambitions of political opponents. Nope, this bum likely was a failure in school as he is showing himself a failure in his first “real” job. The only sad thing is that our great nation is going to have to pay the price for generations (a la Jimmy Carter) for this poseur’s incompetence.
I know because while Harvard may not release his transcript, access to the names of those graduating with honors are openly available. Just google Obama and magna cum laude.
In my humble opinion, a college transcript is baseless information; there are too many variables to take into consideration as to whether this is a viable means to measure anything. Consider, there is no way to input whether the student was working full time, paying his way through college, or was on a full ride scholarship. Was the student married and raising a family while working? Did Mommy and Daddy buy the kid a home, cars and provide an ‘allowance’?
Then we have the gauntlet of grading policies in various universities; Consider Brown University in Texas - the AVERAGE GPA for engineers there is 3.5. Yeah, their AVERAGE is honor role at other universities. My university syllabus provided a mathematical formula ensuring that the AVERAGE grade was a C (2.0). For reasons unknown, this is not the norm - we are graduating students who AVERAGE B and A grades.
This places no consideration onto other real-life scenarios; for example Sports places pressure on teachers to pass students who have not earned a grade, as well as other political pressure. Try flunking a black student; let me know how it goes.
Grades are practically meaningless; because what is ‘C’ work under one professor, may be ‘A’ work under a different professor, for the same work, for the same class, at the same university.
Really? If true, I think he would be proud to release his transcripts. It might even boost his dismal ratings considering how little positive he has accomplished since graduation.
If and when he ever does so, I suspect they will be some doctored version and not the real thing. I think so because, so far, there is almost nothing about this man which is real-- at least nothing which comes from his own press office.
The guy is an image, a player, an actor, an icon and anything and everything else but real. He can't even be compared to Tiger Woods in this regard because Tiger, at least, had a genuine and demonstrated talent for playing golf.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.