Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin's Cover Shoot
The Daily Beast ^ | July 10, 2011 | Emily Shur

Posted on 07/10/2011 9:01:13 PM PDT by CedarDave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Prokopton
Hmmm... I see what you're saying. I could have worded my comment better.

Since Newsweek is no longer part of the Washington Post news group, maybe they are Newsweek is trying to become more relevant.

And, yes, I worry about the Washington Post and other liberal/leftwing publications issuing faint praise. But remember, praise, such as it might be, is always "balanced" by a hit piece somewhere else in the publication. Count on it. A leopard's spots may fade when shedding its coat, but they never disappear.

21 posted on 07/10/2011 9:58:34 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Okay, okay. I’m convinced now. She’s really not running. ... When “they” are after you anyway for questionable brains, why deliver proof and sell calendars shots?

Well, o.k. then. You can stick with this one:


22 posted on 07/10/2011 10:04:45 PM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Newsweek is nearly bankrupt (financially, if not morally) and they know Sarah sells. That’s why they’re giving her publicity.

I thought the cover photo looked a little awkward more than “relaxed” and it almost appeared as if they enhanced her bust the way Rolling Stone enhanced Al Gore’s “package” back in 2000. Again, to sell magazines, not so much to promote the candidacy.


23 posted on 07/10/2011 10:08:54 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Very funny! Seriously! :)


24 posted on 07/10/2011 10:19:33 PM PDT by RitaOK (We hang together or will hang separately. 2012, or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
All great shots of an impressive, intelligent lady.

I'd love to see Matthews and Couric and their ilk kicked off Sarah's planes! Just do it!

25 posted on 07/10/2011 10:21:04 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Geez man, I’m eating!


26 posted on 07/10/2011 10:23:13 PM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Photo #4 is a classic.


27 posted on 07/10/2011 10:28:00 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Okay, okay. I’m convinced now. She’s really not running. These photos are wonderful and she is very beautiful, but these poses appear to be designed for commercial material and not presidential hopes.

Okay, you're right.

Here's a very presidential picture of Perry posing with a puppy.

...just for you.

LOL!

28 posted on 07/10/2011 10:35:18 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas
"One problem newsweek has is that it is about impossible to take a bad picture of Sarah"

It is certainly a fact that any picture of her shows a person comfortable and confident with who she is.A vast contrast to the transparent shallow,establishment types which are foisted upon us.

I hope she does run and look forward to the immense popcorn fest that will ensue as all the beltway elitists run in circles devising plans and lies to destroy her.

When that happens,if the silent masses become loud and come to her defense,then maybe there will be some real hope and change.

29 posted on 07/10/2011 10:45:05 PM PDT by pricilla (one should always try to be smarter than the equipment one is operating - Amajato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

You’re right to be skeptical. Sarah should have been also. Of the 8 pictures posted, not one was in a suit, at a rally, in a meeting. They were all glamor shots and completely alone. Why do you suppose they did that?

When will Republicans realize that they are being interviewed and photographed by DEMOCRATS?


30 posted on 07/10/2011 10:47:28 PM PDT by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Cute. I noticed Ricter is on the grounds of the Governor’s Mansion at least, which counts a tad more toward the politics over the calendars. But, thanks. :)


31 posted on 07/10/2011 10:50:26 PM PDT by RitaOK (We hang together or will hang separately. 2012, or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Can’t wait until she runs. :-D


32 posted on 07/10/2011 11:04:44 PM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
You're being selective. You see the evidence that suggests Perry may run and you ignore the evidence that Palin may run.
33 posted on 07/10/2011 11:33:32 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
Indeed, it may well be that the liberal MSM is promoting Palin because its stupid enough to think Obama couldn't lose to her.

Something along the lines of being hoist on their own petard!

34 posted on 07/11/2011 12:07:19 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Perry has been pretending a run for a lot less time than the calendar girl, and if he pretends anywhere near as long as she, I’ll be looking elsewhere from him too. It seems unfair to the others who are doing the heavy lifting, and it sets the bench sitters up, legitimately, for being called “spoilers”. Rick has his team together and looks serious. Money and endorsements count and they’re after it.
Sarah isn’t.


35 posted on 07/11/2011 12:53:20 AM PDT by RitaOK (We hang together or will hang separately. 2012, or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Cute puppy!


36 posted on 07/11/2011 1:07:25 AM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Yes, you could be correct. Then again, you could be incorrect.


37 posted on 07/11/2011 1:17:11 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh; Norm Lenhart; Springfield Reformer; conservativeforpalin; Brices Crossroads; ...

More pics at link PING!


38 posted on 07/11/2011 3:07:35 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

What a lovely woman she is...beauty and strength into one image...wow!


39 posted on 07/11/2011 3:10:07 AM PDT by ScottinVA (A poster on a White House wall on 20 Jan 2013: "Malice doesn't live here anymore")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: brityank
I'd love to see Matthews and Couric and their ilk kicked off Sarah's planes! Just do it!

She won't even let them on, that is more like it.....

40 posted on 07/11/2011 3:15:42 AM PDT by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson