No expertise needed to see that the WH PDF had touch-up work done to it. The remaining question is the picture taken by Guthrie on the right. Is it the touched-up version or the AP version?
Posted on 05/19/2011 6:28:25 PM PDT by Red Steel
All valid questions jm...how about the fact that the law firm Obama used to work for began invesitgating the NBC issue (back in 2006/2997 I believe). Why???
Clearly, *NOBODY* who can do anything cares/agrees. This is a dead issue until that changes. It’s a damn shame, but that’s where we are.
I disagree...the BC/eligbility issue is one of the elements of criminal behavior that is being alleged here with Obama/Soetoro/Bounel/ Soebarkah), at minimum a Forged Selective Service Registration and fraudulent use of a SSN.
I’m with you. Relentless pursuit of the truth will pay off.
Anyone who says that it is a waste of time or a distraction is just trying to take the wind out of your sails. They do this because it is the one of the best defenses against the pursuit of the truth.
The other defenses against the truth are ridicule, alienation and wild goose chases.
Hmmm, now where have I seen this happening...
I agree, the MSNBC interview clearly contradicts the cert we were given in April. I’ve been looking at the 3 images (WHPDF, AP high res, and Guthrie) and found a few items that don’t support my sequence of events and some that do. The R in BARACK (box 1a) is grayscale on both the WHPDF and the Guthrie snap and black on the AP HiRes. The Guthrie shot is low res so it’s hard to tell, but it looks like the Guthrie image could not just be simply the AP HiRes printed onto green hashed paper. It’s not clear though, because the Guthrie image is so poor.
And that very question is another reason why the layers-means-fraud theory collapses.
Absolute gobbledygook.
So the proper sequence for that evidence is AP HiRes white background -> print to green hash paper -> seal and show to Guthrie -> scan back into computer -> diddle.
I’ve looked at the various magnifications and most look like a smiley face; one someone posted last night was a bit fuzzier and looked as though it could have been anomolies from the forging process. But I leave the final judgement about it to the experts, and I do not mean the 0h0m0 hirelings/toadies.
For a counterexample to the ‘R’ above, the ‘K’ in Kenya supports my theory. In the AP HiRes it is dark. In the second Guthrie snap (she took a narrower snap that missed some critical components like the rubber stamp) it is clearly dark. But in the WHPDF it is light and grayscale. The reason for that is that the postprocessing diddling that the WH did, picked up “enya” as letters, but left the ‘K’ behind because it overlapped the vertical form line.
It appears that Dan-O/Hawaii Five-O are going to have a busy summer rounding up the perps. Mahalo!
Pinging a few of you to cpforlife’s comment.
Pinging a few of you to cpforlife’s comment.
I saw that (#205) - it appears that a highly qualified expert has put her reputation on the line - saying the WH PDF is a forgery.
This person is the author of 17 books on electronic document editing and creation. This is not just some guy on the internet, and the supporting evidence is documented.
No expertise needed to see that the WH PDF had touch-up work done to it. The remaining question is the picture taken by Guthrie on the right. Is it the touched-up version or the AP version?
Yes - ties a bow on it.
I'm hardly ignorant. The number he put out 920 I would like to see verified by others who can clean up the same image as seen below, and not take some guy working pro bono or otherwise for Obama for CNN news or the DoH. And 2nd, anything at this point coming from the Hawaii's DoH is completely suspect, especially some abstract that was set up to go on national TV and not from a guy whose mommy said she saw Obama at the hospital after 3 years into this fraud was being played out.
From post 6.
It’s also out of sequence with the certificate for Stig Waidelich, who was born on August 6, and has a certificate number of 10920. This is almost 200 numbers off of both the Nordyke twins and the Obama certificate number, and indicates the whole theory is fatally flawed.
Actually it's 279 numbers off of Obama's COLB and 283 and 282 numbers off the Nordyke twins COLBs.
The only problem with 205 is relying on the layers. They are obfuscation added only to the PDF after everything was printed out and displayed.
So that’s where the other fuzzy one came from, thanks.
The '2011' is quite different in the Guthrie date stamp.
That’s been better answered by others.
I doubt it.
Discussed earlier in the thread. Imaging artifacts is my issue; document numbering isn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.