Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: The Wizard
no matter what she chooses to do on her own, she is the only one I will vote for in 2012

Even if it hands the win to the commies.

Gotcha. Brilliant. Carry on.

11 posted on 04/30/2011 4:45:47 PM PDT by humblegunner (Blogger Overlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: humblegunner

Even if it hands the win to the commies.

Gotcha. Brilliant. Carry on.
////////////////////////////

You sir are already castrated by the “commies”.Go back and listen to her speech at the Republican convention. She is a female RR and has more character in her than the entire Democrat party. We let the left “Bitch slap” us when they attacked her and we didn’t respond. Just like the country boys got bitch slapped when they let Kanye West rape Taylor Swift on that music awards show and nobody went up there and kick his ass. You are an f-ing disgrace. go look for a moooooderate to sneak past the libs while the country goes down in flames.


16 posted on 04/30/2011 5:01:43 PM PDT by photodawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner
Even if it hands the win to the commies.

Well that's the point. If the commies win with either the GOP or the dem candidate, what's the diff? It's an objective question. If, God forbid, Sarah does not run, who will the alternatives be, not in terms of party, but in terms of commitment to the restoration of a free-market, small government, constitutional Republic? Put another way, if the lesser of two evils will still take you over the edge of that socialist cliff, is it objectively possible to NOT waste your vote? A choice between arsenic and cyanide is hardly a real choice.

I'm not saying no other good candidates exist, but currently none of them have anywhere close the chance Palin does of winning it all. That, and they, like Palin, don’t have the support of the Party Elite. If that's that case, then a Draft Sarah movement such as our author is obliquely suggesting is not out of the question as a way to field a conservative candidate who has a reasonable chance of winning. This is all too hypothetical, of course, because I don't think it'll come to that. Sarah can take the GOP nomination if she wants it, and I think she does.

And frankly, your objection that it objectifies her is simply absurd. Over the centuries the truly great leaders have been less interested in power and more interested in service. They were mentally healthy individuals would rather live quiet, happy, private lives. George Washington comes to mind. But history called them off the bench and thrust them into the game, against their natural inclinations, not because of their smallness, but precisely because of their greatness. They were needed, and they heeded the call. There is no shame in that.

31 posted on 04/30/2011 5:40:48 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson