Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China deploys carrier-killer missile
Coach is Right ^ | January 1st, 2011 | Jim Emerson, staff writer

Posted on 01/01/2011 12:42:17 PM PST by darkwing104

Adm. Robert Willard, Commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, told the Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun that China is deploying its new Dong Feng-21D anti-ship ballistic missile they publicly claim can sink U.S. aircraft carriers. The Admiral stated “this kind of capability should be a concern to the region, and it poses a challenge to any naval or air operations that would be conducted in that area were it to be employed.”

What is a Dong Feng-21D?

The Dong Feng-21D is a land-based guided missile that launches it war-head into space and returns it to earth at ten times the speed of sound while maneuvering to strike a moving target. Updates and tracking will be provided by satellites, unmanned aerial vehicles and radar all linked by a communications network, most likely, provided by military satellites.

Since the targets will be out of sight of ground base units it would have to be dependent on air and space borne

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: dhina; unitedstates; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Vigilant1
Similar arguments were made by the battleship navy crowd about naval aviation circa 1940.

History settled the debate. Let's not get caught exposed again.

Wiki: "HMS Prince of Wales (pennant number 53) was a King George V-class battleship of the Royal Navy, built at the Cammell Laird shipyard in Birkenhead, England. The Prince of Wales had a brief but active career, helping to stop the Bismarck and carrying Winston Churchill to the Newfoundland Conference; however, her sinking by Japanese land-based bombers in the Far East in 1941 is one of the events that led to the end of the battleship being considered the predominant class in naval warfare."

Hubris can kill.

21 posted on 01/01/2011 1:28:45 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
They call it the ‘Clinton’.

The Clinton is the code name for the Bill version of the missile.

The Clin2ton is the code name for the Hillary version of the missile.

22 posted on 01/01/2011 1:29:14 PM PST by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
They call it the ‘Clinton’.

The Clinton is the code name for the Bill version of the missile.

The Clin2ton is the code name for the Hillary version of the missile.

23 posted on 01/01/2011 1:29:21 PM PST by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: joelt
I'm concerned that nothing would happen. Obambi would make a state trip to Beijing and genuflect.
24 posted on 01/01/2011 1:30:49 PM PST by ArmyTeach (Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain ... Iowa 61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
Seems like the perfect target for our new rail-gun system. Assuming they get the bugs worked out and with the electrical power generating capacity of nuclear reactors, it`s little more than a suborbital live fire target exorcise.
25 posted on 01/01/2011 1:31:51 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

26 posted on 01/01/2011 1:33:23 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: joelt
I`ve heard we keep half of our nuke subs in port at any one time, by agreement.
27 posted on 01/01/2011 1:34:30 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
We also have a few thousand ICBMs.

Not with the New START, we don't. It limits delivery systems.
28 posted on 01/01/2011 1:44:10 PM PST by andyk (Hi, my name's Andy, and I am a BF 1942 / Desert Combat junkie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
"... we just launch a space shuttle..."

Where are we going to get a space shuttle? Last flight scheduled for April 2011. Fleet is being scattered.

29 posted on 01/01/2011 1:56:14 PM PST by Calamari (Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
TM:
"Similar arguments were made by the battleship navy crowd about naval aviation circa 1940. History settled the debate. Let's not get caught exposed again."

Sorry, but your comparison is simply invalid and inapplicable. The same was said about antiship cruise missiles like the Exocent making navies obsolete. That was obviously wrong., as are almost all claims about new 'superweapons' making whole classes of primary weapons systems 'useless' and 'obsolete'.

You clearly do not understand just how difficult a modern carrier is to sink. A carrier is literally a small floating city, and has thousands of watertight compartments. To sink one, you need a to breach a significant percentage of those compartments. This weapon is not even remotely capable of accomplishing that. They are in no way the quantum advancement represented by the introduction of aerial warfare. They are merely a different means of delivering an explosive warhead the size of an aircraft bomb on target.

Even in WWII, our carriers were able to absorb multiple direct hits by 1000 pound and larger armor-piercing bombs and not be sunk. Modern carriers are much larger and have far better firefighting and damage control equipment. There have been a number of cases where fires in the hangar decks of modern carriers have led to the explosion of several aircraft fully loaded with ordnance. This involved a hell of a lot more explosives; tens of thousands of pounds of them; detonating within the ship than a half-dozen direct hits from these Chinese missiles could deliver. Our carriers not only survived these incidents, they returned to port under their own power.

So the idea that these Chinese missiles can actually sink a carrier is fantasy. They could, if they somehow got past our Aegis anti-missile defenses, certainly damage a carrier, but the same is true of any weapon system aimed at carriers. That is the nature of war; attack and defense. This is just another new warhead delivery system for which we already have a good defense.

30 posted on 01/01/2011 1:57:05 PM PST by Vigilant1 (The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: joelt

We’d better be thinking of a new POTUS because the one we have isn’t going to retaliate.


31 posted on 01/01/2011 2:03:16 PM PST by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
Although the 21d is being publicized as conventionally armed, I believe that it is nuclear capable and a nuclear warhead could certainly sink the carrier along with the rest of the group.
32 posted on 01/01/2011 2:22:56 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Probably their allies the Clintons.
No sarcasm needed.....


33 posted on 01/01/2011 2:26:21 PM PST by 9422WMR (Illegal is not a race. illegal alien, illegal alien, illegal alien, illegal alien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Paid for and developed, by one-sided “Free Trade”.

It will get worse.


34 posted on 01/01/2011 2:31:56 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy was Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Hubris can kill.

Darn right. It's like the notion that USAF bases and facilities are less vulnerable than 30kt aircraft carriers.

35 posted on 01/01/2011 3:37:04 PM PST by Jacquerie (Our Constitution is timeless because human nature is static.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
We also have a few thousand ICBMs.

All of which have been functionally deactivated by Komrade Kenyan.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

36 posted on 01/01/2011 3:39:23 PM PST by The Comedian (Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Don’t forget popping the “three gorges” dam. Worth 5 times the cost of a carrier, and that’s not counting the lost electricity and damage downstream.


37 posted on 01/01/2011 3:57:01 PM PST by ROTB (Sans Christian revival, we are government slaves, or nuked by China/Russia when we finally revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Jezz, it was just a few days ago when this missile was announced as still in the pre-testing stage, now it is not only tested, manufactured, and deployed as operational.... my those Chinese sure move fast.


38 posted on 01/01/2011 5:53:15 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine .. now it is your turn..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"No biggie, WE have Obama to bow the Chinese into submission!

We are covered so don't worry."



39 posted on 01/01/2011 6:07:49 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

some tru spokes, drop it a little..... those white walls are redickulus!!!


40 posted on 01/01/2011 6:08:19 PM PST by Iron head mike (The government will soon make criminals of us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson