*All Aliases...AKA Tater Salad.
Whatever the wording the opposition will insist it is un- necessary. Or too broad/ or vague. OR some judge will claim it violates the Constitutional rights of politicians to LIE cheat or steal an election and therefore un-Constitutional.
There will be some State may agree in concept only— others
that will insist they will not be required to do what Congress ought do —while Congress-especially those members addicted to Power will refuse to ratify such a reasonable Amendment.
Ah, good point. I forgot about that. How would a SOS be able to find out aliases, or how could that be incorporated into the process of verification? How might an alias affect eligibility? (Just trying to clear things in my mind)
Should add to have the applicant include on the application their full legal name and any previous names used - and then require all birth and citizenship documentation filed under any of those names.
There may not be any Indonesian citizenship records for Barack Hussein Obama II but there may well be for Barry Soetoro or Soebarkah (or however that was spelled). Of course, the applicant could just lie, like Obama did when he told the Bar that he had used no other name.
Knowing previous names would also be important for somebody like Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro/Sutoro, who used a different combination of initials and names every day of the week practically - because citizenship records could have been stored under any of those names.
And the maiden/married names for women candidates or for the mom of the candidate (to determine whether the mother was a US citizen when the candidate was born) would also be needed to get to the right documentation.
So I think you’re right; knowing all the names involved would be important.