Coming to America: OIC to Impose Sharia (Islamic) Law via UN to develop a "legally binding

Atlas Shrugs ^ | 27 September 2010 | Pam Geller

[combat_boots]

Title: "Coming to America: OIC to Impose Sharia (Islamic) Law via UN to develop a "legally binding institutional instrument" to Kill Free Speech about Islam and jihad"

Aspiring to the caliphate ..............

So what can we hope to see coming out of the international Islamic supremacists conference in Chicago this week? First read Bat Ye'or, the world's leading scholar on Islam in the West and Islamic antisemitism in the American Thinker -- The OIC and the Modern Caliphate:

The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is a religious and political organization. Close to the Muslim World League of the Muslim Brotherhood, it shares the Brotherhood's strategic and cultural vision: that of a universal religious community, the Ummah, based upon the Koran, the Sunna, and the canonical orthodoxy of shari'a. The OIC represents 56 countries and the Palestinian Authority (considered a state), the whole constituting the universal Ummah with a community of more than one billion three to six hundred million Muslims.

The OIC has a unique structure among nations and human societies. The Vatican and the various churches are de facto devoid of political power, even if they take part in politics, because in Christianity, as in Judaism, the religious and political functions have to be separated. Asian religions, too, do not represent systems that bring together religion, strategy, politics, and law within a single organizational structure.

[combat_boots]

See pic of conference at link. Title is truncated, BTW.

[struggle]

You’re asking for the English Defense League with guns.

[Joe Boucher]

Any one have ANY confidence that the Supremes would throw this crappola out in the garbage where it belongs?

[CORedneck]

Rhetorical question - is this the “World Religion” that will be pushed in the end times by the Anti-Christ ? For along time, I was thinking that New Age and Environmentalism would be the end time religion but they aren’t as violent as compared to Islam !

[aces]

“The OIC has a unique structure among nations and human societies. The Vatican and the various churches are de facto devoid of political power, even if they take part in politics, because in Christianity, as in Judaism, the religious and political functions have to be separated. Asian religions, too, do not represent systems that bring together religion, strategy, politics, and law within a single organizational structure.”

Thats why they should not be protected as a religion, lets kick these a hol%$ back to their hellholes and send the UN and burBummer with them..before they frig&^% infest us with the lies of perv Mohamm

[LowTaxesEqualProsperity]

We will not submit, and you are going to have to kill us if you try to make us.

[Doogle]

the UN is 60% Muslim

[Cacique]

bump for later..

[ronnie raygun]

We need to dump the UN from American soil for starters.

[CORedneck]

I read the article. All I say is FUOIC ! Time for a few of to go clean house. First, those illegal muslims should be put on a boat to where they come from. Those who legally became residents, either they assimilate to the local culture and support it or leave !

It is a shame countries like Denmark is having a lot of problems with the muslims. The people especially in the Danish Gov’t need to lay down the law. Shape up or ship out !

[himno hero]

I think your number is light. Moamarr Ghadaffi (voted king of kings in Africa about two years ago) can carry the African vote of 83( or thereabouts) nations, add in his neighbors , then his friends in the mideast, the mainstream muslim votes and I think you readily pass 60 percent....

The UN is muslim, and when they push for their own dollar? They are merely masking sharia and their objective of global governance, a caliphate.

Worst part of it is the G7 and the industrialized west foot the bulk of the bill.

[OneWingedShark]

Consider this:

1 — The USSC gutted the requirement of the 5th Amendment for eminent domain to be for PUBLIC use (and for fair compensation) in Keelo v. New London.
2 — The USSC’s de facto gutting of the 4th Amendment due to allowing police to search & seize w/o a warrant but on “probable cause.”
{the 4th Amendment allows the *issuance* of warrants based on probable cause; not search/seizure based directly off of probable cause.}
3 — The USSC’s self-exaltation to a position of super-legislature; able to manufacture law out of whole cloth and invalidate all State rights on the
legislative front (in effect destroying the 9th and 10th Amendments) as they did in Row v. Wade.
4 — The USSC’s failure to even hear arguments regarding the Constitutional eligibility arguments regarding Obama.
5 — The USSC’s allowance of the Executive-branch’s repudiation of Bankruptcy Law, and the contracts behind the bondholders, in the GM/Chrysler fiasco.
6 — The destruction of the Rule-of-Law by declaring that the prohibition on Ex Post Facto law and Bills of Attainder apply only to criminal law.
{Consider that retroactive tax-law changes are allowed, because they are civil/regulatory... yet violations of tax-law are prosecuted in criminal court.}

So, there you have a half-dozen examples of the high-court’s dedication to injustice and tyranny.

[Uncle Miltie]

[Joe Boucher]

I’ll take that as a NO confidence vote for you OneWingedShark.