Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistani Lawmaker Delegation Refuses Body Scans at US Airports
The Voice of Reason ^ | March 7, 2010 | Texas Peartree

Posted on 03/07/2010 11:21:46 AM PST by Texas Peartree

I am someone who travels a lot for work. Over the past dozen years I have traveled to almost all the states in our great land. After 9-11, initially I was glad to see the increased security at airports. In October of 2001, I remember walking over to a Houston Police Department officer holding a sub-machine gun at Bush International Airport, and thanking him for being there. It was comforting.

Today the feeling is very different. As opposed to common sense measures, such as ethnic profiling of passengers, we have a system that treats everyone as an equal threat to bring down a plane. Last month, for example, full body invasive scanners were installed at 19 US airports. These are to be broadly used on grandmas and children. This is wrong and dangerous. Our enemies rightly laugh at us.

Last week, a six-member delegation of Pakistani lawmakers from one of their more restive regions came all the way to the United States in order to refuse a body scan at a Washington airport. Why? They say that these scans are an invasion of privacy and thus an insult to their religion. Yet, it is precisely their co-religionists who are the only threat that exists to US civil aviation.

Is this an example of chutzpah? Gall? Or something else? These gentlemen knew that the scanners would be used on them before they began the arduous journey from Pakistan, yet they got on the plane to come here. Why? Perhaps their goal was to soften up American defenses, or see if we are serious about protecting our planes? We are not serious, but perhaps these scanners can convince them that we are.

It may sounds hypocritical, but I am for scanning others, while leaving me alone. I am not . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at corybirenbaum.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: pakistan

1 posted on 03/07/2010 11:21:46 AM PST by Texas Peartree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree
If they don't like the body scans that they flew over here to refuse, then let them purchase and fly on their own private planes.
2 posted on 03/07/2010 11:24:04 AM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm really not Leo Farnsworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

If those suckers can afford to come half way around the world to screw with our system, then we dont need them, deport their scuzzy asses.


3 posted on 03/07/2010 11:24:49 AM PST by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

Simple. No body scan, no ride on the flying camels. Period!


4 posted on 03/07/2010 11:24:58 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (A proud American-American since 1949.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

Common sense and Homeland security don’t mix


5 posted on 03/07/2010 11:25:00 AM PST by vwbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

Not to mention the invasion of a blast of radiation to your body every time you go through one of these things.


6 posted on 03/07/2010 11:25:05 AM PST by waus (FUBO UFCMF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leo Farnsworth

“If they don’t like the body scans that they flew over here to refuse, then let them purchase and fly on their own private planes.”

Hmmm, wouldn’t that potentially be just as dangerous?


7 posted on 03/07/2010 11:25:09 AM PST by Texas Peartree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

Normal humans have to undergo every imaginable indignity to travel, while Islamist Terrorist Sympathizers don’t want to undergo security searchs?

Take a camel next time, Osama.


8 posted on 03/07/2010 11:29:33 AM PST by FormerACLUmember (The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

Not if the USAF shoots them down first


9 posted on 03/07/2010 11:32:31 AM PST by vwbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

I would refuse it too. They are totally unecessarily invasive.


10 posted on 03/07/2010 11:33:32 AM PST by GeronL (I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree
Pakistani Lawmaker Delegation Refuses Body Scans at US Airports

As well they should! Everyone should refuse them. If everyone refused them, and refused to fly until they were gone, we could bring the airline industry to its knees. And get our country back to what it used to be. Instead of having our privacy invaded in every way imaginable. I'm sure I'll hear from the naysayers. Fine, get stripped naked then. Let the machines see through your clothing. And into your soul, if you have one.

11 posted on 03/07/2010 11:40:00 AM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Be strip-searched by scanners!!! Buy ObamaCare or go to jail!!! Welcome to our Totalitarian world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waus
Not to mention the invasion of a blast of radiation to your body every time you go through one of these things.

And the radiation dose you receive from the flight.

12 posted on 03/07/2010 11:40:00 AM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree
Hmmm, wouldn’t that potentially be just as dangerous?

Why?

If they can cough up 50 million for a 60,000 pound G5 or G550 then they can fly it anywhere they want and explode it and kill all aboard (all 12 of their friends).

If they only have 3 million they can buy an Eclipse 500 with a range of 1,250 miles and a weight of 6,000 pounds. Then they can kill themselves and the other 5 occupants of their aircraft.

In each scenario there will be 200 +/- innocent civilians NOT on their ITTY-BITTY aircraft who will not be killed by explosives strapped to the jhiadist bodies of theses creeps who want unfettered access to 800,000 pound 747's.

13 posted on 03/07/2010 11:48:59 AM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm really not Leo Farnsworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree
America violates the Muslim right to blow up airliners.

14 posted on 03/07/2010 12:00:35 PM PST by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

Fine. So let them WALK! Preferably back home!


15 posted on 03/07/2010 12:15:15 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waus

It’s not an xray. It’s a millimeter-wave device that doesn’t penetrate the body. Either way I personally don’t like them. Proud no longer to be a flying member of society anymore. I just can’t voluntarily submit myself to the zero tolerance stupidity of the TSA “officers”.


16 posted on 03/07/2010 12:17:12 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Apparently maybe it does:

“...unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication.”

http://www.naturalnews.com/027913_full-body_scanners_DNA.html

Sorry about the radiation reference...I think I might prefer a dose of radiation to this.


17 posted on 03/07/2010 1:28:03 PM PST by waus (FUBO UFCMF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree
They say that these scans are an invasion of privacy and thus an insult to their religion.

I say their religion is a threat to our national security and well being and therefore it's either "drop your pants" or go back to where you came from.

18 posted on 03/07/2010 3:01:55 PM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waus

It looks like they use two types of waves. Apparently the terahertz waves are the ones that pass through the body. The millimeter waves end at the surface of the skin.


19 posted on 03/07/2010 5:12:31 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson