Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic civil war update: MoveOn raises $3.6 million to attack party moderates
Washington Examiner ^ | 11-6-09 | Byron York

Posted on 11/06/2009 3:29:00 AM PST by radioone

A few days ago, the left-wing activist group MoveOn.org began sending out emails seeking contributions to fund primary challenges against any Democratic senator who does not fully support "health care reform with a public option."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: democrats; healthcare; moveon; moveonorg; obamacare; politics; socializedmedicine
Strange...the LSM is only reporting on the "problems" in the Republican party.
1 posted on 11/06/2009 3:29:02 AM PST by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radioone

The “moderates” from both parties should form their own party.


2 posted on 11/06/2009 3:32:35 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

With the Liberal Democrats working harder than ever before to get the blue dogs out, and the conservative Republicans working harder than ever to get the RINO’s out, I think its safe to say that Obama is the most polarizing President in American History.


3 posted on 11/06/2009 3:37:10 AM PST by RatsDawg (At least we don't have to worry about riding in Ted Kennedy's car anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The Moderate Party, “We believe whatever you want us to”


4 posted on 11/06/2009 3:38:11 AM PST by RatsDawg (At least we don't have to worry about riding in Ted Kennedy's car anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Moderate” has no meaning as far as I am comcerned, particularly as applied to Republicans. Have you ever heard any Republican referred to as a liberal? Many so-called moderate Republicans are are just this side of being radical liberals or socialists.


5 posted on 11/06/2009 3:40:14 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: monocle
What the SEIU had to say about Michigan's newest "republican" state senator.

The SEIU Michigan State Council announced at a press conference on August 17th that it has endorsed Republican former State Representative Mike Nofs for State Senator for the 19th state senate district, which includes Calhoun and Jackson counties and the cities of Battle Creek and Jackson. SEIU represents more than 2,000 members in the district.

“An SEIU endorsement comes with a commitment to help our candidate win and then work together afterward to improve the lives of working people,” said Phil Thompson, executive vice president of SEIU Local 517M and president of the SEIU Michigan State Council.

• Mike Nofs has a proven track record of aggressively advocating for issues that he believes will move our state forward. • Mike Nofs believes in collective bargaining and was a proud union member during his time with the Michigan State Police. • Nofs believes that the current healthcare system is broken and the answer lies with both private industry and the government working together. • Nofs opposes privatizing state services because he understands that there are ultimately no costs savings.


Its being touted as a win but I'm struggling to see it.
6 posted on 11/06/2009 3:44:43 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I lost any respect I ever had for Newt Gingrich after his performance in the NY 23rd election. Gingrich played all the language tricks that Alinsky liberals employ and played average people for fools.


7 posted on 11/06/2009 4:00:24 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: radioone
* Wes Boyd : Wes Boyd, the California-based founder of MoveOn.org-------------------- "Salon.com Announces Election-Year Initiative With MoveOn, The Guardian and Air America ," by Timothy Karr , MediaChannel.org , March 13, 2004 Dateline NEW YORK, March 9, 2004 , http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1097243/posts#6
8 posted on 11/06/2009 4:20:33 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
1. MoveOn.org - Launched September 22, 1998

Launched not long after the bombing of the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and at a time we were having a particular bout of trouble with Iraq.

9 posted on 11/06/2009 4:23:28 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: piasa

SEPTEMBER 22, 1998 : (MOVEON.ORG IS LAUNCHED BY WESLEY BOYD & HIS WIFE JOAN BLADES —see SHADOW PARTY’S ‘SEVEN SISTERS’) MoveOn.org
Launched September 22, 1998
...High-tech entrepreneur Wesley Boyd and his wife Joan Blades created MoveOn. Their software company Berkeley Systems Inc. of Berkeley, California made a fortune in the early ‘90s with its “After Dark” screensaver, featuring the famous animated “flying toasters.” When the screensaver market peaked in 1994, Berkeley Systems rolled out a successful line of CD-ROM computer games.[3] Company sales had reached $30 million annually by the time Boyd sold Berkeley Systems in 1997 for $13.8 million.[4]
Idle, wealthy and still full of fight, Boyd and Blades sought new challenges. Angered by the Clinton impeachment, the couple wrote a one-sentence petition and e-mailed it to friends, who then e-mailed it to others in chain-letter fashion. It said, “Censure the president and move on to pressing issues facing the nation.” At the same time, Boyd and Blades launched a Web site enabling people to sign their petition electronically. To their astonishment, 100,000 supporters registered in the first week.
Boyd and Blades realized they were onto something. They launched MoveOn.org on September 22, 1998. One month later, on October 23, they rolled out MoveOn PAC, a federal political action committee designed to siphon political contributions from MoveOn’s fast-growing membership. -———— ?”The Shadow Party: Part II,” Front Page Magazine.com ^ | October 7, 2004 | David Horowitz and Richard Poe?


10 posted on 11/06/2009 4:25:14 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: piasa
A lot of foreign influence here:

OCTOBER 7, 2004 : (MOVEON) Today, MoveOn boasts an e-mail list of more than 2.2 million members in the USA and over 800,000 abroad.[5] The lean-and-mean operation rents no office space. Its ten full-time staffers work from home, staying in touch via e-mail, instant messaging and weekly conference calls.[6] ---------- ?"The Shadow Party: Part II," Front Page Magazine.com ^ | October 7, 2004 | David Horowitz and Richard Poe?

11 posted on 11/06/2009 4:27:08 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: piasa

SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 or later : (SOROS & SON, PETER LEWIS, PETER BING {see MAFIA} & LEWIS CULLMAN POUR MONEY INTO MOVEON — See SHADOW PARTY, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CO.) In the meantime, George Soros had incorporated MoveOn into his Shadow Party. Following the September 17, 2003 meeting between Soros and Boyd mentioned in Part 1, Soros and his associates poured nearly $6.2 million into MoveOn over a period of six months, according to the Center for Public Integrity. The contributions include $2.5 million from George Soros personally; $2.5 million from Peter B. Lewis of Progressive Insurance; $971,427 from Peter Bing of Shangri-La Entertainment; $100,000 from Benson & Hedges tobacco heir Lewis Cullman; and $101,000 from Soros’ 34-year-old son Jonathan T. Soros, an attorney and financier recently promoted to deputy manager of Soros Fund Management LLC. ————— ?”The Shadow Party: Part II,” Front Page Magazine.com ^ | October 7, 2004 | David Horowitz and Richard Poe?


12 posted on 11/06/2009 4:28:17 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: piasa

1994 : (TX : SMEAR CAMPAIGN ON W BUSH’S NATIONAL GUARD SERVICE — See GLENN SMITH, ANN RICHARDS— SEE TEXAS VETERANS FOR TRUTH {see MOVEON, TANG }) [See Glenn Smith,Texas Veterans for Truth, John Kerry, John Edwards, Ann Richards; VERSES SWIFTVETS]
*****
Have you noticed that no one has mentioned the most obvious suspect? The one whose involvement must be kept secret at all costs? The 527 which was specifically set up and funded by MoveOn ($400,00) for the purpose of countering the SwiftVets by attacking Bush’s National Guard service? Doesn’t it seem improbable that they would not have any role in this?
Add to that the fact that their founder was the original person to attack Bush’s Guard service in 1994? That prior to 1994 he had access to National Guard files via his boss Ann Richards? That as campaign manager for their last gubernatorial candidate and head of the largest Dem organization in Texas that every Democrat operative knows him well.
Tie Glenn Smith and Texas Veterans For Truth into the story and you get unlawful coordination.
233 posted on 09/20/2004 6:22:40 PM PDT by bayourod


13 posted on 11/06/2009 4:30:07 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: piasa

DECEMBER 2003 : (JONATHAN SOROS & THE INFAMOUS MOVEON BUSH=HITLER AD) Jonathan Soros has become personally involved with MoveOn.org’s activities. In December 2003, he collaborated with techno-rocker Moby to organize “Bush in 30 Seconds,” an online contest for the best 30-second anti-Bush TV ad. MoveOn agreed to air the winning commercial on national television. Among the 1,500-odd submissions to the contest were two ads juxtaposing footage of George W. Bush and Adolf Hitler. MoveOn posted these ads on its site. Under pressure from Jewish groups and Republicans, MoveOn pulled the Hitler ads and apologized for them. [10]
Despite such gaffes, MoveOn need not worry about its media image. Major networks and newspapers pour forth an endless flood of free publicity for the group. Calculated in terms of equivalent advertising fees, the millions MoveOn raises in political contributions doubtless pales in value beside the worshipful profiles and saccharine coverage which major media never tire of bestowing upon [Wesley] Boyd and [his wife Joan] Blades’ Web site and political campaigns....-—————The Shadow Party: Part II
Front Page Magazine.com ^ | October 7, 2004 | David Horowitz and Richard Poe


14 posted on 11/06/2009 4:31:17 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RatsDawg

>> The Moderate Party, “We believe whatever you want us to”

The Moderate Party: Doing WhatEVER We Have To Do So We Can Party In DC.

The Moderate Party: Were Fun! We’re Uninhibited! We have NO Principles! We Look Like America! Or At Least, Like America Prime-time Teevee!


15 posted on 11/06/2009 4:37:20 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RatsDawg

>> The Moderate Party, “We believe whatever you want us to”

The Moderate Party: Doing WhatEVER We Have To Do So We Can Party In DC.

The Moderate Party: Were Fun! We’re Uninhibited! We have NO Principles! We Look Like America! Or At Least, Like America Prime-time Teevee!


16 posted on 11/06/2009 4:37:28 AM PST by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: piasa
FEBRUARY 15, 2007 THU : (MOVEON.ORG-ENDORESED MURTHA PROMISES TO UNDERMINE US WAR EFFORT BY CHOKING OFF COMBAT FUNDS TO THE TROOPS) U.S. Rep. Murtha touts way to choke off Iraq war reports, "U.S. Rep. John Murtha, a leading congressional opponent of the war in Iraq, on Thursday said his plans for placing conditions on how President George W. Bush can spend $93.4 billion in new combat funds would effectively stop an American troop buildup."
“They won’t be able to continue. They won’t be able to do the deployment. They won’t have the equipment, they don’t have the training and they won’t be able to do the work. There’s no question in my mind,” the Pennsylvania Democrat said."
Now we see what George Soros is getting for the millions of dollars he spent on MoveOn.org, with which Murtha has consorted openly.
"“Screw them,” Rep. John Murtha said of Republicans in an email sent to the liberal political group MoveOn.org on Wednesday. The Pennsylvania Democrat, who is urging a U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq, added that he needs its members’ help to throw GOP congressmen “out of power — as many of them as possible.”"
-----John Murtha and MoveCongress.org knife the U.S. Armed Forces IsraPundit ^ | 2/16/07 | Bill Levinson
17 posted on 11/06/2009 4:37:39 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: piasa
The Bush administration "won't be able to continue. They won't be able to do the deployment. They won't have the equipment. They don't have the training and they won't be able to do the work," Murtha said in the post on the Democrat-friendly Web site MoveCongress.org. "This vote will limit the options of the president and should stop this surge." --------http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,252216,00.html
18 posted on 11/06/2009 4:44:40 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: piasa
* Senator Patrick Leahy : This FreeRepublic.com thread gives the information and photographs of Democrat US Senator Patrick Leahy meeting with and planning political actions with MoveOn.org MoveOn.org was formed during the first impeachment proceeding against Bill Clinton to defend the Clintons and is now pushing Dean, Gore, Clark, and Hillary. It is now currently involved in soliciting foreign campaign money for Democrat candidates in the USA in direct violation of the very Campaign Finance Reform bill that they pushed thru Congress. After pushing thru CFR the Democrats found they could now only raise about $1 to every the Republicans raised in spite of their control of ABC, NBC, CBS, NYT, WP, LAT, and many other liberal news media outlets. Now they demand FOX, FNC, talk radio, and the internet be silenced as they are losing voters and elections as the Iraq War and growing economy proves their taxation and cut the military schemes brought us the Clinton March 2000 recession and 911. CFR bans you from buying a political ad 60 days before a primary and 30 days before an election. Network TV and newspapers can criticize a political candidate but your US Constitutional Freedom of Speech rights are now null and void. Some people are more equal than others. FreeRepublic article, thread, and FR member comments: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1042838/posts
19 posted on 11/06/2009 4:47:15 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: piasa
* CPUSA & MoveOn.org : ...they can delete it from the website but if it was there then the "way back machine" will have a snapshot of it back then. bwaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhaaaaaaaaaaa! My favorite is the Communist party USA, where for ages, MoveOn.org was listed on the front page as their ACTION wing of the CPUSA. http://web.archive.org/web/20030719052730/http://cpusa.org/ 8 posted on 01/17/2006 8:12:44 AM PST by The Bat Lady | To 1
20 posted on 11/06/2009 4:48:55 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I think that is what is happening. Both party extremes are for big government and total government control. The moderates, as you call them, are going independent. I think they are the base of the tea party movement. It’s big government against the people.


21 posted on 11/06/2009 6:12:13 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
The moderates, as you call them, are going independent. I think they are the base of the tea party movement.

LOL yeah all those pro McCain signs at the tea parties should have been my first clue.
22 posted on 11/06/2009 6:14:31 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

Why screw around with calling themselves a moderate party. They should just cut to the chase and call themselves the ankle grabbers.


23 posted on 11/06/2009 6:15:49 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: radioone

Unemployment rises to 10.2 percent; black unemployment rises to 15.7 percent
Staff Reporter | Posted November 6, 2009 8:37 AM

The unemployment rate in October soared to 10.2 percent while black unemployment rose to 15.7 percent, the Labor Department reported on Friday.

The overall unemployment rate was the highest rate in 26 years, but the numbers do not reflect the millions of Americans who have stopped looking for work and are no longer counted as unemployed. The last time the official unemployment rate was at 10 percent or higher was in April 1983.

While GDP statistics indicate the country is no longer in recesssion, the U.S. economy shed 190,000 jobs in October, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The largest job losses over the month were in construction, manufacturing, and retail trade.

The unemployment rate for teenagers was also high at 27.6 percent.

The news comes as President Obama and Congress struggle to pass a major health care reform bill and just days after closely watched elections in New York, New Jersey and Virginia on Tuesday.

http://thedailyvoice.com/


24 posted on 11/06/2009 6:35:30 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I didn't see any pro McCain signs in the tea party photos.

IMO, the tea parties are about keeping big government, right or left, from treading on the people. Contrary to popular belief, the founders did not like tyrants of either the right or left persuasion. The goal was freedom.

25 posted on 11/06/2009 6:43:26 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

You’ve aparently got a real twisted idea of what moderate means.

Since you moderates are such a vast majority, maybe you should stop asking for our votes and teach us a lesson by forming your own party.


26 posted on 11/06/2009 6:50:38 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
So you are a big government republican?...as in you want to rule the people with a right wing fist? No better than the "progressives" who want big government for their own reasons. You want a right wing big government to put a leash on the country. You think you have a better model leash.

These ideas are not what the country was founded on. Many came here to escape "right wing" oppression as in, one country thought their religion should rule and all the others should be eliminated or oppressed.

It's fascism whether it comes from the right or the left. Right now, it's all coming from the left. You try to instill a theocracy in America and I will be just as against you as I am the commie regressives. That's not called being a moderate, that's called protecting freedom.

27 posted on 11/06/2009 7:00:28 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

LOL moron.


28 posted on 11/06/2009 7:01:39 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Protecting freedom is moronic...I see. So you and your big Federal government friends are God now and freedom to the people means nothing? You are all knowing and all seeing and people should follow your orders...is that it?

Congratulations, you would fit in very well with the left who want to eliminate individual, state and national sovereignty.

29 posted on 11/06/2009 7:21:58 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Go lay down boy, you anot honest enought to deal with. Just like every other cowardly moderate.


30 posted on 11/06/2009 7:32:56 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
An SEIU endorsement comes with a commitment to help our candidate win and
then work together afterward to improve the lives of working people,

The concept is wrong, all wrong. It's the responsibly of working people to improve their
own lives. But then we're not dealing with people who understand the concept of America.

31 posted on 11/06/2009 7:49:45 AM PST by MaxMax (Obama can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

The thing that bothers me is that our state’s newest republican senator stands somewhere to the right of Nancy Pelosi and somewhere to the left of Olympia Snowe.

This is what happens when people blindly vote for a party. We now have a pro green economy, pro union, pro socialized medicine “republican” state senator. Fortunately its only for a year.


32 posted on 11/06/2009 7:57:45 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I'm moving to NV next week and will be fighting to rid the Senate of Reid
the same way I fought to rid us of Daschle. Special thanks to George Allen
for hosting the Daschle retirement party at the RNC in NY.

2010 will be a war to uphold the Constitution. The one year constitutional war.

33 posted on 11/06/2009 8:05:54 AM PST by MaxMax (Obama can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I think educating people will be the most important thing. Its especially true in state and local races because those are the ones people pay the least attention to.

KNOW YOUR CANDIDATES.

Good luck with Reid.


34 posted on 11/06/2009 8:11:50 AM PST by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson