Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Obama Implodes, Is This Wishful Thinking?
From Sea to Shining Sea ^ | 9/25/09 | Purple Mountains

Posted on 09/25/2009 7:34:25 AM PDT by PurpleMountains

Once again a familiar scenario is being played out. Memories fade as to how bad liberal governance can be, and a liberal Democrat is elected president. Once in office, the failure of policies based on what liberals would like the world to be (instead of what experience has shown) becomes obvious, and dissatisfaction with this nonsense rises. In Obama's case we have the added specter of his obvious hatred for his own country and his desire to right imagined wrongs to add to the mix.

Please, please, conservatives, I beg of you. Put your energy into reshaping the Republican Party - not in creating a new party. Third parties only serve to elect Democrats. Remember the Anderson debacle and how Ross Perot gave us Clinton, and fight instead to renew Republican commitment to conservative principles. Demand a new Contract With America complete with a promise to incorpoate Term Limits - and this time, hold them to this promise.

(Excerpt) Read more at forthegrandchildren.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: barackobama; jimmycarter; ronaldreagan; rossperot

1 posted on 09/25/2009 7:34:26 AM PDT by PurpleMountains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains

is Barry really imploding? I don’t believe that...


2 posted on 09/25/2009 7:36:12 AM PDT by musicbymuzak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains

You are Naive. 51% still approve of Hussein and he still has the State Run Media.


3 posted on 09/25/2009 7:40:03 AM PDT by omega4179 (We must be the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicbymuzak

The words sure look nice.


4 posted on 09/25/2009 7:40:17 AM PDT by bergmeid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains
In Obama's case we have the added specter of his obvious hatred for his own country ...

I've never heard Obama say anything disparaging about Kenya ...

5 posted on 09/25/2009 7:40:18 AM PDT by In Maryland ("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicbymuzak

When the party reflects my values get back to me.


6 posted on 09/25/2009 7:40:24 AM PDT by vicar7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: musicbymuzak

I dont’ believe it either. One well placed lie, another ‘Emergency’, maybe a homeland terrorist crisis or two and the big O will be sitting pretty with most of the country ...


7 posted on 09/25/2009 7:40:54 AM PDT by TexGuy (If it has the slimmest of chances of being considered sarcasm ... IT IS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains

Here is the roll call vote from March 29, 1995, for the term limits constitutional amendment, which needed a 2/3 vote to pass:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1995/roll277.xml

Note who did not vote for it, especially the Republicans.


8 posted on 09/25/2009 7:41:45 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

If we have a crisis Barry won’t know what to do. He doesn’t listen to the General HE apointed in regards to troops or anything about the war. Worst acting President ever.


9 posted on 09/25/2009 7:46:10 AM PDT by freebird5850 (O-Bomba is not the Messia. Jesus was a carpenter and could build a cabinet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains
We do not need a new party. All a new party will do is split the conservative vote and guarantee a Dem victory.

We need an organization which will focus on primaries.

We need an organization which will recruit conservative primary challengers to existing RINOs, mentor and support those challengers, and allow us to fund those challengers to victory.

10 posted on 09/25/2009 7:48:09 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In Maryland

LOL!!! Glad I wasn’t eating or drinking anything when I read your comment!


11 posted on 09/25/2009 7:52:09 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Maureen Dowd is right. I DON'T like our President's color. He's a Red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: In Maryland

LOL!!


12 posted on 09/25/2009 7:55:01 AM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

And no more McCains or even Doles, I like Dole however


13 posted on 09/25/2009 7:57:45 AM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains

Getting the GOP bacjk on track? Job number #1 is getting RINO Juan McCain dumped in the 2010 primary.


14 posted on 09/25/2009 7:57:57 AM PDT by Frantzie (Do we want ACORN running America's healthcare?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains
Once again a familiar scenario is being played out. Memories fade as to how bad liberal governance can be, and a liberal Democrat is elected president.

You've made a couple of big mistakes there, I think, and they really matter.

First off ... yes, Obama is a liberal Democrat, and the Dems naturally consider him to be one of their own. But the fact is that in many ways Obama transcends Party. His appeal, such as it is, tends to be visceral and personal, rather than partisan. He's a rock star, not a politician. And Obama, with that towering narcissism of his, has already shown this tendency to make and keep things personal.

As for "liberal governance," the most that can be said is that Obama's got an intellectual tendency in that direction. But here the news is much worse: as we saw from his week of silly speeches, Obama actually governs according to his own excruciatingly naive, sophomoric, and generally ill-conceived ideals.

What we face now is much, much worse than any "liberal Democratic" governance of the past ... which, even if ill-conceived, was at least carefully conceived.

As things currently stand, we don't even get to rely on the "careful" part -- we're stuck having to hope that Obama's ego-stroking will occasionally cause him to make a correct decision; and that none of the bad guys will take serious advantage of the fact that we're being led by a callow amateur.

15 posted on 09/25/2009 8:12:18 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
We need an organization which will focus on primaries. We need an organization which will recruit conservative primary challengers to existing RINOs, mentor and support those challengers, and allow us to fund those challengers to victory.

I tend to agree, but I would put it a bit differently: what we need, is a de facto return of the Smoky Back Room, whereby serious candidates can be identified, recruited, and vetted.

And at the same time, we need to get serious about the intellectual side of conservatism; and we need also to get serious about when and how to apply it in the real world.

As it stands now, all we've got is a bunch of shallow celebrities who don't stand a chance in hell of being taken seriously by the general electorate.

16 posted on 09/25/2009 8:17:05 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains

For every impassioned plea to “reshape the Republican party”, I see ten RINOs elevated or promoted by the party. Even the head of the RNC clearly believes that republicans must “court” blacks, and that pro-abort pols are welcome standard bearers.

To paraphrase the Gipper, the republican party has decided to leave conservatives. Why should conservatives martyr their principles to save the republicans?


17 posted on 09/25/2009 8:23:04 AM PDT by MortMan (Stubbing one's toes is a valid (if painful) way of locating furniture in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
I tend to agree, but I would put it a bit differently: what we need, is a de facto return of the Smoky Back Room, whereby serious candidates can be identified, recruited, and vetted.

The problem is that you seem to be assuming that the people in attendance in that Smoky Back Room share your values, and would vet accordingly. Currently, the RNC people have too many RINOs among them.

What's needed is some trusted new group (whether that be SarahPAC, something growing out of the Tea Party organizations, or something else) which would hold their own "Smoky Back Room", and field conservative candidates worth backing in the Primaries.

18 posted on 09/25/2009 8:28:04 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
The RNC people have too many RINOs among them.

Well, sir, I'm sorry to say that the use of the term "RINO" has become a sign of intellectual poverty -- nothing more than a shorthand way of saying "doesn't agree with me about X."

Until you get over your delusions of party purity, you're going to be a very disappointed man.

19 posted on 09/25/2009 8:36:39 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMountains

“Put your energy into reshaping the Republican Party - not in creating a new party.”

I’ll join any party that stands for low taxes, small government, individual freedom, strong military. Pretty simple really.


20 posted on 09/25/2009 8:38:15 AM PDT by yazoo (Conservatives believe what they see. Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson