Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Explains Errors
Accuracy In Media ^ | AUGUST 4, 2009 | Don Irvine

Posted on 08/04/2009 6:47:53 AM PDT by AIM Freeper

The New York Times public editor conducted a self examination after seven errors appeared in a single article recently.

From the New York Times

THE TIMES published an especially embarrassing correction on July 22, fixing seven errors in a single article — an appraisal of Walter Cronkite, the CBS anchorman famed for his meticulous reporting. The newspaper had wrong dates for historic events; gave incorrect information about Cronkite’s work, his colleagues and his program’s ratings; misstated the name of a news agency, and misspelled the name of a satellite.

“Wow,” said Arthur Cooper, a reader from Manhattan. “How did this happen?”

The short answer is that a television critic with a history of errors wrote hastily and failed to double-check her work, and editors who should have been vigilant were not.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: bigmedia; liberalmedia; mediabias; newyorktimes; nytimes; obama

1 posted on 08/04/2009 6:47:53 AM PDT by AIM Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

Sounds like day-to-day NYT quality.


2 posted on 08/04/2009 6:51:10 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper
The short answer is that a television critic with a history of errors wrote hastily and failed to double-check her work

All the news that's fixed after print....

3 posted on 08/04/2009 6:53:36 AM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

“Public editor”?

What happened to the editor or editing process prior to the article being released for publication/printing?

Failure on more levels than one, courtesy of the dubious NYT.


4 posted on 08/04/2009 6:54:53 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

It’s the Times. I never expect veracity.


5 posted on 08/04/2009 6:55:14 AM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper

When you are at a toxic waste dump expect to see a lot of garbage.


6 posted on 08/04/2009 6:58:44 AM PDT by immadashell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AIM Freeper
The short answer is that a television critic with a history of errors wrote hastily and failed to double-check her work, and editors who should have been vigilant were not.

Doubt it.  She's probably a journalism school dropout.  It's evident she's a product and poster child of the U.S. education system. Journalists don't have to be right, they have to be liberal.

7 posted on 08/04/2009 7:02:12 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Stop meddling in the affairs of countries and individuals Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cranked
>What happened to the editor or editing process prior to the article being released for publication/printing?

I clicked through and read
the full Times explanation.
The newspaper sounds

like it is run by
the Marx Brothers, everyone
dropping things, falling ...

8 posted on 08/04/2009 7:41:25 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson