Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

--> This guy has a lot of "insight" into DOJ affairs.
1 posted on 07/02/2009 7:43:35 AM PDT by mudblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mudblood

Holder’s race laws, make him the second coming of the Nazi regime.


3 posted on 07/02/2009 7:45:14 AM PDT by junta (I am the son of Yacub, who for one welcomes my new overlord Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Hey Holder, who is going to protect you?


4 posted on 07/02/2009 7:45:43 AM PDT by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
One of the most fundamental principles in the founding of this nation was that all are created equal. A bloody Civil War was fought to sustain it.

And another may come to restore it.

6 posted on 07/02/2009 7:48:24 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
Then Holder goes on to list the only groups intended to be protected by the proposed law. This is racial identity politics taking a sinister turn. Holder explicitly says the proposed law only protects classes “where there is a history” of violence against those groups. “What we are looking for here in terms of expansion of the statute are instances where there is a historic basis. See, groups of people who are singled out for violence perpetrated against them because of who they are. I don’t know if we have the same historical record to say members of our military have been targeted in the same way that people who are African American, people who are Jewish, people who are gay, have been targeted over the many years.” (minute 73:00-74:00)

This is clearly and egregiously unconstitutional, but given the current political climate - including SCOTUS - it will probably pass. All you white people jes better watch youself!
8 posted on 07/02/2009 7:49:11 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Henry Bowman, please pick up the white courtesy phone.


9 posted on 07/02/2009 7:49:45 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I don't believe anything anyone says about anything anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
So a white couple mugged, raped and murdered by racist black gangs or LaRaza Hispanics are just a statistic of an unfortunate incident?

Got it.

11 posted on 07/02/2009 7:50:28 AM PDT by poobear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

This is seriously insane. If any of the senators had any ba&&s they would have thrown him out of the room.

Reverse racism working overtime.


12 posted on 07/02/2009 7:50:28 AM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
XIV Amendment!! EQUAL PROTECTION. Will some GOPer please bring this up in public along with a promise to bring the question to SCOTUS if this abomination becomes law. The GOP seems so enfeebled by the Obama method of constant pressure on all fronts.

Maybe the GOP should consider restructuring the party along the lines of a parliamentary party. Create a shadow govt. Develop a full array of policy alternatives. Nominate a candidate for POTUS this summer whose only job will be preparing for 2012 and being the daily visible opposition to Obama. The Dems are both restrucutring American govt AND running a permanent campaigm. It's time for the GOP to do something outside the box.

14 posted on 07/02/2009 7:52:38 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

What would it take to prove a historical pattern of violence against white folks?


15 posted on 07/02/2009 7:53:11 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

If it doesn’t protect whites and ministers, or anyone else, then it denies equal protection of the law. Hello?


16 posted on 07/02/2009 7:55:48 AM PDT by popdonnelly (The Democrats have returned to their game of supporting totalitarian regimes. Now they're muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

“Whites and Ministers will not be protected by proposed hate crimes legislation”

If anything, they will be the preferred target. Like Jews in Europe. It’s been this way since the sixties and it’s getting more and more overt.


17 posted on 07/02/2009 7:56:08 AM PDT by Niuhuru (Anger means your spirit isn't broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
There goes equality.

By the way, haven't the moslems been slaughtering the Christians and people of other faiths since their inception?

The killing of anyone is a hate crime.

No one is more deserving than another!

22 posted on 07/02/2009 7:58:15 AM PDT by mckenzie7 (TOTUS = PONZI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Our government becomes more and more illogical and irrational. That’s a hallmark of fascism.


25 posted on 07/02/2009 7:59:34 AM PDT by popdonnelly (The Democrats have returned to their game of supporting totalitarian regimes. Now they're muslim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Unconstitutional under the 4th amendment. We don’t need hate crimes laws anyway. It is already against the law to physically attack someone, regardless of the reason. I see no instance, ever, of a physical attack on someone being a love crime. Hate crimes are just another way to make privileged class in America. As I said, it is an unconstitutional law under the 4th.


35 posted on 07/02/2009 8:08:08 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
I Guess Holder hasn't heard of Equal Protection under the law or the Equal Protection Clause in the Constitution.

He should be fired.

36 posted on 07/02/2009 8:08:10 AM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the Dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Especially since the FBI actually prosecutes hate crimes against whites...well, they used to, anyway, that is until they get Holder’s memo...

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2005/table1.htm


38 posted on 07/02/2009 8:09:49 AM PDT by IMTOFT (At least I'm enjoying the ride...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Well, then, Rev Wright’s sermons could be used as evidence of hate speech against whites, as could all the negative press for Pro-lifers and Veterans by the DoHS. All we need to do is cry real loud.


39 posted on 07/02/2009 8:09:59 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Worthy is the Lamb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Despicable ! Racists in the DOJ.


44 posted on 07/02/2009 8:16:42 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood
I am wondering which city will host the upcoming "American Nuremberg" trials, when we retake this country from the Afro-Marxist cabal and hold racist thugs like Holder to account for these atrocities.


A verbis ad verbera

45 posted on 07/02/2009 8:17:30 AM PDT by Costumed Vigilante (Congress: When a handful of evil morons just isn't enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood; SumProVita; HardStarboard; BradyLS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; dervish; Twotone; ...

The list, ping


51 posted on 07/02/2009 9:45:49 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Rule 10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”

Rule 13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

If the Birthers can’t move him out of the White House, he may well be the catalyst for another (un)civil war.


52 posted on 07/02/2009 9:48:54 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Whites will not be given any jobs either!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opxuUj6vFa4


54 posted on 07/02/2009 10:02:06 AM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood; All

“Holder explicitly says the proposed law only protects classes “where there is a history” of violence against those groups. “What we are looking for here in terms of expansion of the statute are instances where there is a historic basis. See, groups of people who are singled out for violence perpetrated against them because of who they are.”
_______________

Okay, fine, Eric. Here’s some HISTORY for you from YOUR justice dept.

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2009/04/janeane-garofalo-have-i-got-date-for.html

FACTS!!! They sure do get it the way!
Take a look at the line for white on black crime at the bottom of the following chart.
Also, note the other charts at the link........during republican administrations, black crime
went down and went up under democrats!

White on black crime is nearly zero, but nearly 20% for black on white!

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htmStranger

In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites

Homicides are more likely to cross racial lines than those that involve friends or acquaintances

For homicides committed by —

* a friend or acquaintance of the victim, less than one-tenth (8%) were interracial
* a stranger to the victim, one-quarter were interracial

To view data, click on the chart.


59 posted on 07/02/2009 10:14:54 AM PDT by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Not only does the violate the 1st Amendment (free exercise of religion), but it violates the 14th - Equal Protection clause!


63 posted on 07/02/2009 11:10:55 AM PDT by LiteKeeper (When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Rush is talking about this right now.


64 posted on 07/02/2009 11:29:13 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Jimmy Carter - now the second worst POTUS ever. BHO has #1 spot in his sights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

And this is why I enjoy spending quality time at the gun range.
I have no intention of being a “victim” of any crime..


65 posted on 07/02/2009 12:52:58 PM PDT by TexasM1A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

67 posted on 07/02/2009 1:11:01 PM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

Of course, we know there has never been a tradition of violence against Christians. Just ask anyone who knows the history of Rome, or Islam, or the French Revolution.


68 posted on 07/02/2009 1:15:02 PM PDT by Poe White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mudblood

This one supposedly up for vote in Senate on Wed. July 15th. Melt the phone lines! E-mail and Fax your Senators!! You can bet those who want this travesty passed will be doing just that!!


73 posted on 07/10/2009 8:51:39 PM PDT by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson