Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: gussiefinknottle

I must be missing something. At first Sullivan was one of the idiots who thought Trig was her grandson. Now that it’s been disproved what is he ranting about now? What question is the MSM suppose to be asking?


6 posted on 07/01/2009 7:45:05 AM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: CaptainK
The left has its own 'birthers' and no matter what kind of factual evidence is presented, they do no believe Sarah gave birth to Trig. They believe it was Bristol's baby and Sarah lied and said it was her own. Nevermind that Trig was born in April- the same month Bristol conceived her son. A woman simply can not conceive a child days after giving birth.

But facts are silly little things to these people. On the one hand, they cry foul when anyone has the audacity to question BOs birth, yet they insist on some Lifetime channel movie plot scenario for the Palins.

It is hypocrisy at its best. And stupidity- something the left has cornered the market in.

7 posted on 07/01/2009 7:52:14 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CaptainK

Yes, does he think Bristol had both babies? A teenage girl has about a 1%
chance of a down syndrome baby.


16 posted on 07/01/2009 10:49:33 AM PDT by gussiefinknottle (woof!woof!woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson