Posted on 05/18/2009 10:09:56 PM PDT by Schnucki
In many ways, Maureen Dowd and Joshua Micah Marshall personify new and old media. One is former political reporter and venerable columnist who dispenses bon mots from the New York Times editorial page once a week. The other is a blogging wunderkind who has blazed a trail with the liberal TalkingPointsMemo site.
So when thejoshuablog (who's not Marshall) blogged over the weekend that Dowd had lifted, almost word for word, a slab of text from a blog by Marshall last week it was inevitable it would become a big deal.
Unfortunately for Dowd, the furore shows little sign of abating - it's now running on CNN- partly because her explanation seems implausible and begs more questions that it answers.
This is what Dowd originally wrote in this column (it's since been changed online):
"More and more the timeline is raising the question of why, if the torture was to prevent terrorist attacks, it seemed to happen mainly during the period when the Bush crowd was looking for what was essentially political information to justify the invasion of Iraq."
And this is what Marshall wrote here:
"More and more the timeline is raising the question of why, if the torture was to prevent terrorist attacks, it seemed to happen mainly during the period when we were looking for what was essentially political information to justify the invasion of Iraq."
So, the only difference is that Dowd used "the Bush crowd was" instead of Marshall's "we were".
Dowd's explanation? That she never read Marshall's blog but had instead used a paragraph emailled (presumably) to her by "a friend".
Huh? As Michael Calderone notes, it's odd to say the least for a columnist to take anything - even from "a friend" - and just copy and paste it without attribution into their piece.
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...
OK.....everybody pony up ten bucks and let’s get this FReepathon over....
Thanks.
I dunno why but I get a very slutty vibe off Maureen Dowd.
I predict Dowd will land a better position because of this.
New York Times’ - Plagiarism Coverup [Week 2]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.