Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judgement Call
Campus Report ^ | March 16, 2009 | Daniel Allen

Posted on 03/16/2009 8:45:03 AM PDT by bs9021

Judgement Call

by: Daniel Allen, March 16, 2009

By some estimates, President Obama may have the opportunity to nominate one-third of federal appellate judges in his first term alone. Presented with such a stunning figure, thinkers and analysts have naturally begun speculate on the best strategy for Obama to employ in his nominations, and to offer advice. The Heritage Foundation assembled a panel of experts on March 11th to offer their insights.

One of the panel’s most interesting discussions centered on whether or not it would be beneficial for Obama to appoint liberal judges to the bench, as they would probably be more inclined to impose stricter limits on certain executive powers. The judges he appoints may come back to haunt him if he seeks to expand the scope of the government through executive leadership.

“Obama might come to regret it if he tilts the federal bench too far to the left,” said Stuart Taylor, a contributing editor at Newsweek. He cited as an example a recent case in which liberal judges voted to restrict the armed service’s sonar training in the Pacific Ocean in order to protect marine life. Although there had been no documented incidents of marine life being harmed by sonar training in the last forty years, Supreme Court Justices Ginsberg and Souter voted to restrict the President’s powers as Commander in Chief.

“If he wants to avoid seeing his national security policy nibbled to death by judicial ducks,” Taylor warned, the President should ask himself while considering nominees, “which group of lawyers and judges tend to be reasonably deferential to the President and Congress, and reasonably modest in expanding judicial power on national security issues?”....

(Excerpt) Read more at campusreportonline.net ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: barackobama; bho44; judicialnominees; supremecourt

1 posted on 03/16/2009 8:45:04 AM PDT by bs9021
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bs9021

I hope everyone who voted for Obama (or who failed to cast a serious vote against him) is pleased with the judges they are going to be stuck with.


2 posted on 03/16/2009 8:47:47 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bs9021

The judges will lean far left, and the hope is that the Supreme Court holds center-right until 2012.


3 posted on 03/16/2009 8:53:37 AM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart.........2012--can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
I hope everyone who voted for Obama (or who failed to cast a serious vote against him) is pleased with the judges they are going to be stuck with.

We'll see many more pro-criminal, pro-illegal immigrant decisions, just like the 70s.

4 posted on 03/16/2009 9:00:40 AM PDT by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson