Posted on 03/14/2009 11:27:57 PM PDT by Schnucki
The atmosphere is cooling, the ice is expanding, the seas are not rising -- even though carbon emissions are increasing. The evidence is now crystal clear to anyone with an unwashed brain that man-made global warming theory is sheer unadulterated bunkum. So how do the warmers react to the ever more embarrassing evidence that they have hitched their reputations to the biggest anti-scientific scam in history? By ratcheting up the hysteria to fever pitch and shrieking that their predictions about the impending irreversible environmental apocalypse have grievously underestimated the catastrophe which is going to be far, far worse.
At the international climate change conference in Copenhagen this week, we were told that the seas would rise by as much as a metre by 2100, that they would turn into acid, and that even the rainforests would be felled not by the loggers’ chainsaws but by the greatest pollutant in the history of the universe, carbon dioxide.
Read these reports carefully and you can see the scam at work. All of these hysterical predictions revolve around a massive ‘if’. They are all based on the assumption that rising carbon dioxide levels produce runaway global warming and inevitable ecological catastrophe. Ignoring the self-evident fact that this theory has already been proved false – as CO2 levels have risen, the climate has stayed pretty flat and in recent years has even cooled -- they then apply this bogus premise to topics not previously covered – the acidity of seas, rainforests – and hey presto, a fresh range of even greater catastrophes is conjured up from their crystal balls computer models.
The Independent reported:
Sea levels are predicted to rise twice as fast as was forecast by the United Nations only two years ago, threatening hundreds of millions
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.co.uk ...
No sunspots for you....welcome to another 400 years of cold.
Devastating. Great read. BTT.
Remember when the liberal talking point was, “global warming” heating up the earth’s seas, would result in a catastrophic increase in hurricanes?...
Drudge’s headline (current)
“Global hurricane activity reaches new lows”.
http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/
Whew — good one.
That's something they just couldn't deal with.
The best was that carbon dioxide-monitoring satellite crashing during ascent into orbit.
Oh, ‘H’-’E’-double hockey sticks. I guess somebody goofed!
Al Gore is currently negotiating with Billy Mays and the Shamwow guy to act as spokesmen for the Global Warming / Climate Change movement.
This is a very scary trend among not just liberals today.
There are no "facts" anymore.
As a race, we are ripe for tyranny.
Sizer’s participation, however, must be seen in the context of a disturbing realignment in the services of the forces of darkness against the free world: the emergence of an axis between a body of evangelicals, the hard left, the Islamists — and the far right.
So your mileage may vary. (Although she *is* speaking of Mediocre Britain, not the US.)
Cheers!
Prof Mörner was an expert reviewer for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This is what he said about the process which led the IPCC to make its predictions of alarming (if subsequently reduced) sea level rise:
Then, in 2003, the same data set, which in their [IPCC’s] publications, in their website, was a straight line—suddenly it changed, and showed a very strong line of uplift, 2.3 mm per year, the same as from the tide gauge. And that didn’t look so nice. It looked as though they had recorded something; but they hadn’t recorded anything. It was the original one which they had suddenly twisted up, because they entered a ‘correction factor,’ which they took from the tide gauge. So it was not a measured thing, but a figure introduced from outside. I accused them of this at the Academy of Sciences in Moscow— I said you have introduced factors from outside; it’s not a measurement. It looks like it is measured from the satellite, but you don’t say what really happened. And they answered, that we had to do it, because otherwise we would not have gotten any trend!
Game, set, and match.
Consider yourself *highly* commended, sir.
Cheers!
GREAT post! Well worth the read. Great sources in it, too.
BTTT
Laying it on the line...
It's not science when a lie is needed to get the right conclusion.
If we are lucky. The "Big Freeze" is really overdue. If this is the beginning of that, it could be a lot longer than 400 years, and a lot colder than the "Little Ice Age". In the chart below, "now" is on the left. Time runs from right to left.
You can also see that we are not as warm now as the peaks of the last few 100,000 year cycles. You can also see that the cooling tends to be just as fast as the warming was, for a while, and then it settles down to slower rate of decent.
The latest I heard was that businesses will have to buy carbon credits from the government, and then either then give them back when they emit carbon, or sell them to others who wish to emit carbon. Those others would then give them to the government.
Hey, he's gotta pay for all that socialist pork somehow.
It always seems to track right back to massive and immediate societal change that creates a modern utopia solidly grounded in Marxist ideals. This "goal" is always accompanied by blather from the liberal elites that we must all make some small sacrifices to our personal liberties for the greater good of society and indeed the entire planet. However close examination also reveals that the only sacrifices being made will be made by you and me, never the limousine or Lear Jet liberals who see it as their sacred task to safeguard the transition from freedom to tyranny.
The exclamation point on this farce comes courtesy of the God of the universe. Notice that the last seven or so of these global warming confabs held here in the USA have been the subject of heavy snowfall and often blizzard-like conditions. Who says God has no sense of humor?
“Al Gore is currently negotiating with Billy Mays and the Shamwow guy to act as spokesmen for the Global Warming / Climate Change movement.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Three of a kind is usually a winning hand. Those other guys may be a little too classy for Al though.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Yepper: You’ll never get out of this world alive....
50-150 thousand years of glaciation?
Oh wonderful.
:-(
That's what the historical record says. Some of those cycles are understood, having to do with the precession of the earth's axis and orbit, others are not. This guy, believes that the 100Kyr cycle is caused by variations in the inclination of the Earth's orbital plane, called nutation.. A 41Kyr cycle is attributed to changes in the earth's obliquity or axial tilt. The 41Kyr cycle dominated until about 1.5 -2 million years ago, while the 100 Kyr cycle has dominated from 1 million year ago to the present.
The whole business is referred to as Milankovitch Variations or cycles.
For the record.... Bangladesh is doomed. Don’t buy stock or securities in a Bangladeshi company. When the ice melts the country will disappear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
