Posted on 03/03/2009 1:15:34 PM PST by Kackikat
"One of the most far-reaching consequences of the General Education Board's political philosophy was achieved with a mere six million dollar grant to Columbia University in 1917, to set up the "progressive" Lincoln School . >From this school descended the national network of progressive educators and social scientists, whose pernicious influence closely paralleled the goals of the Communist Party, another favorite recipient of the Rockefeller millions . From its outset, the Lincoln School was described frankly as a revolutionary school for the primary and secondary schools of the entire United States . It immediately discarded all theories of education which were based on formal and well-established disciplines, that is, the McGuffey Reader type of education which worked by teaching such subjects as Latin and algebra, thus teaching children to think logically about problems. Rockefeller biographer Jules Abel hails the Lincoln School as "a beacon light in progressive education "."
(Excerpt) Read more at apfn.net ...
Another article of interest The Bankruptcy of the United States has some interesting testimony from 1993.
Reading this whole article takes some time, but ties some real interesting facts together, and answers a lot of questions. Please read the whole article, it is one of the best researched histories of banking and corruption plus it agrees with many account of how the "Communist Manifesto" was backed by secret society members.
Unaborted pregnancies.
ML/NJ
Progressive Liberals come from the indoctrination factories known as our colleges and universities.
“Progressive liberal” is an oxymoron, since liberal ideas don’t cause progress.
Rush has been getting progressively a little more “out front” with his theory that the government of the US is seeking near total control over the industrial means of production of the US a la USSR. Now, part of me thinks this is pure tinfoil, but if I allow the idea to percolate some, I have to start considering what would be the alternative explanation for what’s being proposed, or perhaps I should say rammed down our throats? If it were true, which of the current policies would be inconsistent with the notion? And I see very little these folks are trying to do that’s not in alignment with the idea.
Liberal ideas aren’t “liberal” either.
Bingo! Please add Manhattan & Boston.
Like the homosexuals, the liberals picked a word, in this case “progressive", to describe themselves because it is the opposite of all they embrace.
It’s called the G20. Gordon Brown is meeting with Obama today to push their agenda forward.
Read the website link articles and google American I G ...a chemical company that helped Hitler and was the basis of at least three of our drug companies that give us pills to keep us dependent on more pills. We are being relieved of our monies deceptively. I believe this banking crisis is the American taxpayer being raped.
The Democrats want to make it look like capitalism has failed, so they will have a good pretext for ushering in full-bodied socialist collectivism. And so far, they’re doing a great job killing the economy! They’re doing such a good job, there’s no need or reason to “hope” that they fail to save the economy: Their failure is guaranteed by their own actions, which have either been excruciatingly stupid, or else diabolically clever!
Where do Progressive Liberals come From?
Hell!
~~Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate in the 1940s.
Grandfather of Newsweek editor Evan Thomas. Newsweek recently put "We are all socialists now" on its cover.
Yes, and if you read the article you will be stunned who was behind it all.
Great link, thanks...can you get this American Patriot Friends Network link like yours so people can just click it and go there, like yours.
I saw that love fest.
Absolutely, and even if we see a jump in stock market, it will not last nor be sustained.... when the interest on the loans become due.
I think everything is being manipulated - oil and gas prices, tax rates, maybe not the stock market because that is the last bastion of free market principles. But nothing is sacred now, i’m very glad i got out of the market in October. Now i’m just planning for survival I guess.
We all need to know who was behind it all, and that it is not a new concept, also these people have stolen money before from the taxpayers, investors and hard working employees.
Where do Progressive Liberals come From?
Well..first they breed with roaches, then they eat the host roaches and morph in to leeches. Eventually they all turn into Barney Frank.
You might have seen it, but you won’t hear the details, I’ll bet. Just the big bad news.
I tried to read it, but my eyes were starting to cross, so I had to quit. I will read it later, after my eyes recover.
As we should be.
and financially supported him.
"The logic of the conspiracy theorists in this regard is, of course, impeccable: Goldman alumnus Josh Bolten runs the White House, while his former boss, Hank Paulson, runs the Treasury. They both speak regularly to former Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin, now over at Citigroup, who ran Goldman before Paulson and who keeps Paulson and Bolton dangling like puppets on a string. They all supposedly touch base with the heads of the Italian and Canadian central banks—both Goldman alumni—and with Robert Zoellick, head of the World Bank, ex Goldman. What's more Paulson is now getting his advice on how to handle the crisis from Ken Wilson, the recently retired Goldman partner and financial-institutions M&A banker, who Paulson just recruited to Washington to help him out. Already at Treasury were Goldman alumni Dan Jester, Anthony Ryan, David Nason and Bob Hoyt, the department's general counsel. And—the conspiracy crowd can't help but point out—Neel Kashkari, 35, a former vice-president at Goldman who Paulson recruited as assistant secretary of international affairs in 2006, has just been appointed—by Paulson—to run, on an interim basis, the new $700 billion bailout fund."
~~William Cohan, "Does Goldman Sachs Really Rule the World?" October 2008
“Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out.”
~~President Andrew Jackson, on the 2nd National Bank
"Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes the laws."
~~Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild (1744 -1812), Godfather of the Rothschild Banking Cartel of Europe
Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money.
~~Sir Josiah Stamp, in1927 the 2nd richest man in England, and former head of The Bank of England
“We have suffered more from this cause [unbacked paper currency] than from every other cause or calamity. It has killed more men, pervaded and corrupted the choicest interests of our country more, and done more injustice than even the arms and artifices of our enemy.”
~~Daniel Webster
"The crisis of the abuses of banking is arrived. The banks have pronounced their own sentence of death. Between two and three hundred millions of dollars of their promissory notes are in the hands of the people, for solid produce and property sold, and they formally declare they will not pay them. This is an act of bankruptcy, of course, and will be so pronounced by any court before which it shall be brought. But cui bono? The laws can only uncover their insolvency, by opening to its suitors their empty vaults. Thus by the dupery of our citizens, and tame acquiescence of our legislators, the nation is plundered of two or three hundred millions of dollars, treble the amount of debt contracted in the Revolutionary war, and which, instead of redeeming our liberty, has been expended on sumptuous houses, carriages, and dinners. A fearful tax! if equalized on all; but overwhelming and convulsive by its partial fall. Everything predicted by the enemies of banks, in the beginning, is now coming to pass. We are to be ruined now by the deluge of bank paper, as we were formerly by the old Continental paper. It is cruel that such revolutions in private fortunes should be at the mercy of avaricious adventurers, who, instead of employing their capital, if any they have, in manufactures, commerce, and other useful pursuits, make it an instrument to burthen all the interchanges of property with their swindling profits, profits which are the price of no useful industry of theirs. Prudent men must be on their guard in this game of Robin's alive, and take care that the spark does not extinguish in their hands. I am an enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but coin. But our whole country is so fascinated by this Jack-lantern wealth, that they will not stop short of its total and fatal explosion."
~~Thomas Jefferson to Dr. Thomas Cooper, 1814
“Gay homosexual” isn’t an oxymoron. It’s redundant.
They come from kindergartens.
The left starts indoctrination at age of 6 at the NEA centers.
Conservatives try to start when citizens reach their thirties.
ROFLMTO, that may be the biological aspect of it, but I was reading the educational one.
Under rocks?
True, but in 1917 Columbia University received millions to start the Lincoln School, to teach communism labeled as progressive liberalism,,,,and it was funded by Rockefellers...and the banking moguls.
Columbia’s Lincoln School provided the curriculums to NEA, whose teachers fed it to the little guys/gals.
The Cloward-Piven strategy
BINGO! We, the taxpayer, and the stockholders, are getting fleeced on both sides, once when the home values are toppled by people like Franks, Dodd, Pelosi, Schummer, Raines, etc at the push of their liberal leaders behind the banks and political scenes who manipulate them, and then again in the taxes we will have to pay to restore the damage that has been done, while the bankers who buy the stocks at rock bottom.... reap again what they sold before the crash they knew was coming.....
Did you get that out of Zero’s desk?
That’s where they live.
What we see on Wall St, in our Government and on our streets is 70 years of NEA.
We try to build our party/philosophies way too late in a persons life cycle.
bookmark
That’s why I posted this article, and although it’s long and takes time to read...it shows who has been behind it and how we got where we are. Sometimes knowing the root cause will help us avoid the pitfall people in future.
Yes, and the conservatives either had parents who overrode the public schools, or teachers who didn’t promote it....or after getting in the workplace woke up, and realized those people didn’t have a clue.
I read the entire thing. Yes and mostly yes, that’s how it is. A friend revealed all before the 2000 election. He’s an econ prof based in Australia, made it clear that it didn’t matter one whit who we elected, as the world is run by international companies who are beyond the laws of any country. Was he correct?
As for drugs and health, 20 years ago in Germany, I had a very revealing chat with a department head for a large US drug maker . He was there buying up patents on homeopathic remedies — they’re cheap and they work, so naturally they must be in the hands of BigPharma instead of sincere little companies. As we drank and chatted into the night, I asked him how they tested prescription drugs on humans. “We don’t,” was his revealing reply. They just lab test them on animals and send them out into the world to see how they work on us. Squadrons of attorneys keep BigPharma companies from losing their shirts when things go wrong.\
It’s all very discouraging and overwhelming. But we can at least refuse to take any drug that hasn’t been on the market for ten years. That’s my way out of becoming a two-legged lab rat. In fact, I recommend taking NO DRUGS for any ailment. The occasional antibiotic, OK, but nothing new or complex.
As for World Politics, I don’t see any way around it. You?
Yes, I think there is some truth to it and a conspiracy, although I believe we do occasionally overcome their political plan. Now this journalist has a lot of articles on it:
http://www.jonchristianryter.com
I do take some meds that are tried and true, but mostly a fan of natural products. The drug companies are a farce and rob the country, and there is a cure for cancer and there have been deaths over it, and they will never let it come to the forefront.
No. From a web site americanthinker.com. If I'd have been anywhere near zer0's desk I would've left ......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.