Posted on 02/27/2009 7:25:00 AM PST by publius321
The Obamunist Manifesto Reeks Havoc - Just as Intended by MrArbitrage
Obama released the 2010 Budget which he titled "A New Era of Responsibility”. It should be called “The Obamunist Manifesto”. Thank Hussein for the deliberate destruction of our economy.
Throughout my Wall Street career I believed the rules about the market, how it is always the best place to be long term, how it always "comes back"… the general rule that the best time to buy is usually when everyone is selling. These were like laws of nature upon which we could depend based on almost two hundred years of American investment history.
The problem now is that the market is...
Warning: Don't click on the Google ads at the site. You wouldn't want Al Gore's company to have to pay for this. LOL
(Excerpt) Read more at OurHussein.com ...
I thought it was called "Obama's Struggle"?
More like “How to organize the Hood”.
That is one of my pet peeves. Mind you I never say anything, but so many people make that mistake. Also, they say a point is mute. Funny, but not the right word (moot).
The other often heard is “wreck havoc” which is a nonsense.
LOL so much nonsense, so little time! (I don’t generally bring these errors to people’s attention since I make plenty of my own, and they’re probably someone’s pet peeve!
Another one I've seen a lot lately:
"marshal law"
The moderator of a gun-related forum I visit has that as his handle. Most fitting, IMO.
That one's actually closer. The writer knows the word has a "w" in it, at least.
Funny you bring that up. I tried to verify that before I wrote it by “Googling” the phrase - before publishing it. Usually when I use that method, Google will have a link that reads “Did you mean wreaks?”.
My intuition told me it was wrong but the corrective link didn’t come up this time to my chagrin and many sources came up that used “reeks” in the same context.
I guess I’ll have to go back to dictionary.com to placate the anal retentive.
deliberate destruction of our economy $3.6.000.000.000.000 should work just fine thank you.
LOL
I think it’s such a common mistake that you would easily pull it up if you googled. It’s not a big deal, in the big scheme of things, and probably one day it will be considered a normal phrase and someone will wonder where it came from! ;)
I knew I would pull up many examples on Google even if it is incorrect. Nevertheless, Google usually corrects you if it is wrong by placing a link on which yu can click indicating “Did you mean Wreaks?”.
I changed it on the blog. I can’t believe I am going on and on about this. I’ll bet these people freak out if/when they read some of our founders like Franklin.
Spelling is not always a concomitant of intellect.
LOL which is why I usually don’t say anything. Anyone who doesn’t get the meaning doesn’t want to. ;)
Exactly. Kind of like the way “sum” here have nothing better “two” “due” than “Too” point out my last response “two” you in “witch” I wrote:
“nothing on which >yu< can click...”
hehehe
We conservatives have bigger fish to fry!
“We conservatives have bigger fish to fry!”
Indeed, like the destruction of western civilzation.
http://www.electedimbeciles.com
I get irritated at noone.
Noone is going to do that or I saw a car wreck, noone was hurt.
Who the hell is NOONE!!!! It’s TWO WORDS PEOPLE NO ONE.
By the way, it’s RIDiculous!!! Not REDiculous.
Lol, I’ll stop.
I know, and I’m very guilty of making a lot one word. And I ALWAYS have to spell check ridiculous!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.