Posted on 01/03/2009 9:32:23 AM PST by BreeLee
Watercliffe Meadow primary in Sheffield is to be known as a "place for learning" after governors decided that the traditional description sounded to "institutional".The £6 million "learning experience", which opens on Monday, will also encourage pupils to wear soft shoes indoors and has got rid of the traditional school bell at the end of lessons, in order to make the place more welcoming."We decided from an early stage we didn't want to use the word 'school', this is Watercliffe Meadow, a place for learning," said Linda Kingdon, the head teacher. "One reason was many of the parents of the children here had very negative connotations of school. "Instead we want this to a be a place for family learning, where anyone can come."We were able to start from scratch and create a new type of learning experience. "There are no whistles or bells or locked doors.....read the rest HERE
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
A school (from Greek σχολή (scholē), originally meaning "leisure", and also "that in which leisure is employed", "school"),[1] is an institution designed to allow and encourage students (or "pupils") to learn, under the supervision of teachers. Most countries have systems of formal education, which is commonly compulsory. In these systems, students progress through a series of schools.Next thing you know citizens won't be allowed to call the attendees, "Students", because if they are forced to "study" than that would hold a negative connotations as well. This is definately and OMG moment, right up there with not saying "Merry Christmas" to people because you may offend someone and wanting to take "so help me God" out of the Presidential Inaguration.
I really gotta ask this question, "So if there's a fire does everyone just scream at the top of their lungs and run randomly in fifty million directions, since there's no bells or whistles"??
“Institutional”???
Hmmm...perhaps the governors could benefit from extended “institutional” familiarity?
ping
ping
Regards,
I remember the school system where I lived in the early 1970’s going through this kind of nonsense. Open classrooms, voluntary participation in lessons by students, nonexistent classroom structures, no bells....naturally, the result was mass chaos and no learning.
Think it goes without saying that the wealthy in this community are not sending their children to this school.
In the larger perspective, in both the U.S. as well as the UK, it’s fascinating to me how willing the populations are to accept the systematic “dumbing down” of their educational structures. As an extension, it’s quite interesting to observe exactly what is being dumbed down and how efficiently such efforts are preparing the population for eventual acceptance of tyranny.
I just about thanked John Semmens for another great “Semi-Satire News” piece from AZ Conservative, until I saw it wasn’t satire.
OOOPS!
2. Seventy percent of them have nothing of any importance to do so they come up with this kind of crap!!!
3. Replacing a word with its definition is absolutely a dumbass thing to do.
It’s clear that these idiots attended schools which were not places of learning.
That's an excellent predictor of beaconicity.
Reality meets ideology in 5.....4.....3....
How about them naming hospital to ‘place of healing’ ...??
They should instead call this an Ultimate Place of Learning.
Hummm, I wonder what the Ministry of Silly Walks will have to say about this. Clearly, some poor village is missing their idiot.
This is actually pretty funny.
What might they call a sewage treatment plant?
An excrement amelioration facility?
An effluent transmogrification place?
A dynamic effusion collective?
a learning facilitator?
Definitely an "indicator of beaconicity!"
You have talent, my FRiend.
By the way, how's work progressing on that 11th edition of the Newspeak Dictionary?
Regards,
I’m suprised they didn’t redesignate it a madrassa.
Good analogy and very Good Point!!
hmmm. I don't know. Ultimate may make other places of learning feel inferior.
Maybe Average Place of Learning?
I agree with this decision- school is generally a negative thing.
hmmm. I don't know. Ultimate may make other places of learning feel inferior.
Maybe Average Place of Learning?
Well, then you have another problem. Average would imply that some places of learning were better while some were worse.
That could inspire feelings of both superiority and inferiority at the same time, causing a dichotomy of conflicting emotions.
Perhaps we should call it the Ultimately Mediocre Place of Learning where everyone is equal (but some are more equal than others).
I taught in a school where there were no bells to “interrupt.” As a teacher, I had to constantly synchronize and look at my watch to make sure I got the kids to their next class on time. Then I had to look out in the hall to make sure others were being let out at the same time. It was a ridiculous situation and made things much more difficult for everyone. This was the same school where the vice-principal (who was called some other non-threatening label—no kidding) told me on my first day when I saw that there weren’t enough books for the students that “We don’t really like to use books here anyway. Real world learning is so much better.” Don’t you love it when the inmates are running the asylum?
All I can say is “corny”. It gets worse all the time the ridiculousness of these people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.