Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Government Blocks Internet Access to New York Times
A Semi-News/Semi-Satire from AzConservative ^ | 26 Dec 2008 | John Semmens

Posted on 12/27/2008 11:59:32 PM PST by John Semmens

Computer users in China found themselves unable to log onto the New York Times web site this week. The site has been blocked by the Chinese Communist government for “politically unacceptable content.”

“While we are hesitant to take such action against a publication that has been of inestimable assistance to the Chinese People’s Republic, we are ashamed to say that the editorial content has become dangerous,” said Dung Chiao Mein, Minister of Electronic Communications for the Chinese government.

The “dangerous content” is purported to be the paper’s “rabid animus against commerce.” “The Times has become depressingly and appallingly ‘left wing’ in its antipathy to the market in America,” Dung explained. “While this is all well and good for stirring up revolutionary turmoil in the United States, we don’t need these attitudes spread around in China. The Chinese government is striving to stimulate the commerce and investment that will enable us to dominate global trade. At this point, the Times’ rants against capitalism are counterproductive in our country.”

(Excerpt) Read more at azconservative.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: 4thestate5thcolumn; bias; enemedia; media; nyt; parody; satire; times

1 posted on 12/27/2008 11:59:33 PM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

No big loss, nothing worth reading in the New York Times anyhow.


2 posted on 12/28/2008 12:00:59 AM PST by Dustbunny (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Pretty amusing...the Times is even too far left-wing for China....I could believe that.


3 posted on 12/28/2008 12:01:36 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

I hope pro-freedom people can find ways around Chicom site blocking.

Is Free Republic blocked?


4 posted on 12/28/2008 12:05:06 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

old story


5 posted on 12/28/2008 12:05:47 AM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Good Morning Mr & Mrs Scooter and All The Ships At Sea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens; Impy; Clemenza; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; NewRomeTacitus; ...
I think I've just about seen it all. A Communist government banning the Slimes because it is too far-left and moonbat even for them.
6 posted on 12/28/2008 12:08:28 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissDairyGoodnessVT

Might be old, but it’s good :)


7 posted on 12/28/2008 12:08:45 AM PST by KellyM37 (Barack Obama's mental illness..........PATHOLOGICAL NARCISSIST... show us the medical records)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

LOL!


8 posted on 12/28/2008 12:12:54 AM PST by wastedyears (In Canada, Santa says "Ho Ho, eh?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KellyM37

KellyM37,regale freepers on how good it is


9 posted on 12/28/2008 12:14:28 AM PST by MissDairyGoodnessVT (Good Morning Mr & Mrs Scooter and All The Ships At Sea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

That part is satire. Hard news articles don’t mention what China’s reason was.


10 posted on 12/28/2008 12:15:01 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

I started smirking, then laughed out hard upon discovery of the satire.


11 posted on 12/28/2008 12:17:56 AM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Maybe their lies are to much to stomach for even a communist!


12 posted on 12/28/2008 12:19:54 AM PST by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Impy

And here I thought the part about the False Messiah being the President-elect was the satire (it damn well ought to be... I’m still waiting for the punchline).


13 posted on 12/28/2008 12:20:03 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
Oh well...Looks like the Chineese will have to purchase the subscription if they want to read that paper.
At least the money will be coming back to America.
14 posted on 12/28/2008 12:26:43 AM PST by chemicalman (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Whew, this is like when Stalin got mad at Trotsky. There will be blood. Watch out for the ice pick, NYT.


15 posted on 12/28/2008 12:30:05 AM PST by elhombrelibre (The MSM has its president elect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman

Something tells me Russia and China do not like Obama.

It’s probably because the NYTimes rediculous praising of Obama.

I’m sure there is Chinese proverb about giving credit to a man who has done absolutely nothing.

Not only that, but Obama makes Putin look like a man among men.

Obama is a man among sheep and the sheep are scared.


16 posted on 12/28/2008 12:30:25 AM PST by jetxnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
Great satirical piece.

It is conceivable, however, that China will soon be more capitalistic and the U.S. more communistic. Who knows, maybe someday we'll have to go over there if we want to start a business or read the truth about Chairman Obama.

17 posted on 12/28/2008 1:03:22 AM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetxnet; fieldmarshaldj

Maybe it’s Obama’s lack of a symbol.

Mao had the Little Red Book.

Clinton had his Little Black Book.

Zero, now: can’t use Blue because it’s associated with car values. Yellow belongs to communication interests. White’s associated with the Bible and he can’t go there. He can’t go Green as he’s about to backstab those suckers.

I say he should go with Grey. It defines “not being” and “vagueness” like himself. Not a citizen, not a Senator, not a patriot, not a contributor, not a Christian, not a veteran, not of any race, not of any history, not having any backing from the real citizens of this nation.

And definitely not my President.


18 posted on 12/28/2008 1:21:31 AM PST by NewRomeTacitus (How do you tar and feather something that's not really there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Must be part of a new anti-littering law.


19 posted on 12/28/2008 1:22:12 AM PST by Tempest (Obama is not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus

Very well put, indeed.


20 posted on 12/28/2008 1:25:05 AM PST by jetxnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

21 posted on 12/28/2008 1:54:56 AM PST by joeclarke (Excuses, Excuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

The Chinese are no fools. They know the power of arrogant and willful deceit. The NYT is a disease of the soul, something which ancient Chinese regarded highly. They will not let its influence spread the cancer that has doomed this country to theirs.


22 posted on 12/28/2008 2:00:22 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

There once was a paper named the new york times
A paper quite guilty of those journalistic crimes
All soon knew its word
Was a big stinking turd
Soon the paper went the way of the most famous mimes


23 posted on 12/28/2008 3:07:10 AM PST by OnTheDress (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
“rabid animus against commerce.”

As good a definition of NYT editorial policy as any I could point to! As practiced capitalists, the Chinese are well beyond the reasoned expectations of a healthy society and on their way to a healthy economy. The USA on the other hand....continuous education on proper "“rabid animus against commerce” is well on its way to the trashheap of communist sloth that Mao introduced to the Chinese decades ago.

24 posted on 12/28/2008 4:20:10 AM PST by CRBDeuce (here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

I censor myself from reading the NYT! No Big Deal! Nothing in it anyway!


25 posted on 12/28/2008 5:34:42 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy

I have used FR and Drudge from Shanghai and Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province. Since Shanghai has a lot of foreigners I was not surprised. However, when it worked in Zhanjiang I was. I have spent a month there spread over 2 trips and I never saw a western person other than in the mirror.

One odd thing is that my cell phone does not work in Zhanjiang. It works every were I’ve been except in Zhanjiang. There is a navy base there. I wonder if they block foreign cells there.


26 posted on 12/28/2008 6:43:29 AM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Strange. My computer also blocks access to the New York Times.


27 posted on 12/28/2008 8:29:15 AM PST by Malesherbes (Sauve Qui Peut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson