"Hated it!"
Posted on 08/17/2008 8:53:48 PM PDT by terbatime
Have you ever watched a highly rated film, as reviewed by the New York Times or some other pompous metro-sexual publication, only to find the movie an incredible piece of crap? I know I have. Why the disconnect?
First of all, how many real men do you know who are hired as film reviewers by TV, magazines, or newspapers? The answer is probably… none. There aren’t any. At least not any I’ve ever seen or read. (My apologies to any real men out there who do review movies. You probably reside in ‘fly-over country’ and don’t get published to the same extent as your metro-sexual brethren.)
In any event, how can these reviewers possibly speak for real men, when in fact they’re metro-sexuals, homosexuals, and/or women? Answer: they can’t. They don’t know us and they don’t know how we think. And even if they did, they’re more concerned with what they think than what you think.
Now, they think they know how we think. They believe we’re a bunch of primitive, unsophisticated, three-toed sloths who can’t tell the difference between a Bordeaux and Burgundy. O.K., they might be right about the wine. But I bet they couldn’t tell a Bud Light from a Coors Light. Generally, they not only scoff at people who don’t think like them, they go out of their way to show their contempt and disdain for them.
read the rest here: http://www.realmanmag.com/moviearticle1.html
(Excerpt) Read more at realmanmag.com ...
"Hated it!"
Two words: Stephen Hunter.
Short answer, no.
Long answer, yes, but no real man gives two sh1ts about what two poofsters think about any movie (or anything else).
Rule 1 must be adhered to at all times!
the infowarrior
Yes, that was posted before I read the article, in case anyone’s wondering...
I go to 1 movie a year and I think I missed this year’s winner with Batman. Guess I’ll be on a 1 movie every other year diet from now on. A hugh loss in my life. /sarc
I go to 1 movie a year and I think I missed this year’s winner with Batman. Guess I’ll be on a 1 movie every other year diet from now on. A hugh loss in my life. /sarc
Yeah, we’ve got a writer by the name of Philip Martin that does movie reviews for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. His “wife” Karen also does reviews. Now, I don’t know if this guy is a poofter or not, but he’s come out in fervent opposition to enforcing laws against public sex by gays. He said (in a published column)that cops who arrest gays having public sex should be forced to clean dog kennels with their bare hands.
He’s actually not THAT bad a reviewer, as far as movies go. I find myself agreeing with most of his reviews, but he goes WAY overboard for gay-produced movies.
This is series...
None we thought of were ones that the metros would rate worth having.
Our Baker's Dozen
Godfather
Braveheart
Diehard
Tombstone
Open Range
U-571
Miracle on Ice
A Bronx Tale
Red Dawn
Man on Fire
Goodfellas
48 Hours
T-2
Can Girlie Men Review Movies for Real Men?
Yes.
Badly.
NO POOFTAS!
FOUR words:
“Stephen Hunter”
Gene Siskel
Add all four versions of War of the Worlds, and THEM!
You might want to add on Saving Private Ryan and the DVD collection of Band of Brothers.
Add all four versions of War of the Worlds
What are the 4 versions? I know of the 1953 and the 2005 versions. IMDB lists a 1988 tv series. I would love to know what versions you were referring to so I could look for them.
I would add “The Thing From Another World” (1951) to your list.
I already know what I'm like.
Got it in one!!! Contravention of Rule 1 is viewed most dimly by those who know of such things.
George Pal/Paramount Pictures, 1953
Steven Spielberg/Dreamworks, 2005
Michael Latt/The Asylum 2005
Timothy Hines/Pendragon Pictures, 2005
First time I realized the major movie critics were a contrarian indicator for me was with T1.
Is that from In Living Color?
If so, what a show that was.
Go see Transformers next year.
Not only do most movie reviewers not speak for real men, they usually don't speak for real women either!
...mama mia. Here I go again. My, my....
Scarface!
I’ve rarely seen any movie that accurately depicted average Americans. They’re all effete Hollyweird screenwriters ideas of Americans. Naturally the protagonists are hard-core libs. If it’s a family, one of the siblings has to be a homosexual. The teens all smoke dope. They’re all sensitive. The kids, especially the youngest ones, are all wise beyond their years and prone to wisecracks making smart-aleck comments about their parents constantly. The scripts are many times the story of one unfortunate teen dweeb who can’t fit it with the rest of the school.. the antagonists are usually nasty, right-wing types who need to see the error of their ways.
I go to “Arrow in the Head” for my horror movie reviews.
John Fallon is a real man!!
My Baker’s Dozen:
The Wild Bunch
The Professionals
The French Connection
The Outfit
Point Blank
Near Dark
Out Of The Past
Thief
To Live And Die In L.A.
The Thing From Another World
Extreme Prejudice
The Usual Suspects
Predator
Jack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.