Rielle Time With John Edwards (Video)

John Edwards finally admitted to what has been known for some time. He has a mistress, Rielle Hunter, but will not admit to being the father of her child. Edwards, being the man that he is, is willing to submit to a paternity test.

GRRRRRREAT music.

from “Live Not By Lies” - Alexander Solzhenitsyn...

“Will not depict, foster or broadcast a single idea which he can only see is false or a distortion of the truth whether it be in painting, sculpture, photography, technical science, or music.”

“And the simplest and most accessible key to our self-neglected liberation lies right here: Personal non-participation in lies. Though lies conceal everything, though lies embrace everything, but not with any help from me.”

from...

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/solzhenitsyn/livenotbylies.html

Thanks to FReeper Fred Nerks for the link.

I have no doubt sure that Edwards is NOT the father of the baby. He would never have proclaimed that he is willing to take a DNA test unless he had ALREADY taken a DNA test.

That was probably the reason for the visit to his girlfriend and the baby at the hotel room last month. One quick swab of the baby’s cheek with a Q-Tip is all it would take for a DNA test.

Edwards probably insisted on taking the sample himself so he would know for sure that it was the baby’s and so that he could have one of his flunkies send it and his own DNA off to a lab without anyone else ever knowing it was his.

The public DNA tests will now come out negative and the MSM will happily accept Edwards’ claim that he had ended his affair sometime before his wife’s cancer came out of remission. The truth is that he probably continued the affair until the Enquirer first outed him last fall.

LOL. So now it is OK as long as he is not the father of the baby and he ended the affair before his wife came out of remission. If people accept that, Edwards has done a masterful job of reframing the issue.

The only problem for Edwards is that the NE has more information that it will release on its own timetable. This glib explanation by Edwards doesn't pass the laugh test. If the affair was over in 2006, what was he doing three weeks ago in LA visiting this woman in a hotel with her child and the NE has proof that they met a month before that in the same hotel. And then there are the monthly payments to keep her quiet and moving her around to different locations, including living with the Edward's aide [and his family] who is allegedly the father. How can anyone believe this guy or take anything he says seriously?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.