Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEN. VOINOVICH STATEMENT ON LIFTING OF OFFSHORE DRILLING EXECUTIVE BAN
Voinovich News Center ^ | 07/14/2008 | Sen. Voinovich

Posted on 07/16/2008 5:28:54 AM PDT by EBH

SEN. VOINOVICH STATEMENT ON LIFTING OF OFFSHORE DRILLING EXECUTIVE BAN

July 14, 2008

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator George V. Voinovich (R-OH), a member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, released the following statement after it was announced that President Bush will lift an executive ban on offshore drilling that has been in place since 1990:

"Today’s action by President Bush is an important step forward, but it must be matched by Congress lifting its moratorium as soon as possible. Ohio families are being hit hard by sky-high gasoline and diesel prices and we cannot afford to wait any longer to tap the resources we have available here at home. That’s why I fought to prevent a 53-cent gas tax hike that had been included in the Lieberman-Warner climate bill. And it is why I proposed a new Manhattan Project that will put us on a path toward energy independence. In addition to increasing our domestic energy supply by exploring the Outer Continental Shelf and ANWR, we must use tar sands and oil shale and we must expand our refining capacity. We need to find more and use less. Unfortunately, environmental groups have convinced some of my colleagues to block anything that would increase supply and bring down prices at the pump. I’ve been voting for increased domestic exploration for a decade. If we had started exploring ANWR 10 years ago when President Clinton vetoed it, and coupled it with a comprehensive energy plan, we wouldn’t be in this predicament today. But now the chickens have come home to roost. We can afford to wait no longer."


TOPICS: Government; Local News
KEYWORDS: 110th; congress; drilling; energy; offshoredrilling; ohio; oil; ussenate; voinovich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last
I can only hope that Sen. Voinovich is one of folks pushing hard on the democrats. I know not long ago he caught a lot of grief over a few tears he shed, but recent correspondance with him indicates he may be stepping up to the plate for Ohio.
1 posted on 07/16/2008 5:28:55 AM PDT by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Ping


2 posted on 07/16/2008 5:29:51 AM PDT by EBH ( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Find More, Use Less: Gas Price Reduction Act
**MEDIA ALERT**

July 10, 2008

WASHINGTON – The Senate Republican Conference will hold an energy forum Friday, July 11, to discuss rising fuel costs and how the Gas Price Reduction Act would lower gas prices by finding more energy while encouraging new technologies that use less. The forum will be chaired by Senator George Voinovich, R-Ohio.

Who: Senate Republican Whip Jon Kyl
Senator George Voinovich, R-Ohio
Senator Arlen Specter, R-Penn.
Senator Kit Bond, R-Mo.
Senator Bob Bennett, R-Utah

When: Friday, July 11, at 9:30 a.m.

Where: Dirksen Room 562

Witnesses Include

Marvin Odum, President, Shell Oil Company, will discuss oil shale

Dave Vieau, A123Systems CEO, will discuss plug-in cars.

Kevin Book, Senior Analyst, Energy Policy, FBR & Co., Inc., will discuss energy markets.

David Curtiss, American Association of Petroleum Geologists will discuss oil in the outer continental shelf.

THE GAS PRICE REDUCTION ACT OF 2008
Summary of Provisions

TITLE I – DEEP SEA EXPLORATION (OCS)

14 Billion Barrels On Atlantic and Pacific OCS – More Than All US Imports From Persian Gulf Countries Over The Last 15 Years
• State Option Nationwide (except Gulf of Mexico)
• Governor petitions to allow exploration, with concurrence of state legislature
• Exploration must be at least 50 miles from coast
• 50% of revenues to Federal Treasury, 37.5% to States, 12.5% to Land & Water Conservation Fund

TITLE II: WESTERN STATE OIL SHALE EXPLORATION

More Than 3 Times The Oil Reserves Of Saudi Arabia
• 800 billion - 2 trillion potentially recoverable barrels in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming
• Democrat Congress put moratorium on final regulations for development of this resource
• Republican proposal would repeal the moratorium and allow exploration to move forward

TITLE III: PLUG-IN ELECTRIC CARS AND TRUCKS

• We need better batteries to maximize electricity range & use less gas
• Increased R&D for advanced batteries
• Direct Loans for advanced battery manufacturing facilities
• Sense of Senate that the Federal Government should increase its purchases of these vehicles

TITLE IV: STRENGTHENING U.S. FUTURES MARKETS

• Authorizes increased funding/staff for Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
• Directs the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets to study the international regulation of commodities markets
• Codifies CFTC action on position limits and transparency for foreign boards of trade
• Requires the CFTC to gather information on index traders and swap dealers

###


3 posted on 07/16/2008 5:35:22 AM PDT by EBH ( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Nice press release-he is stepping up to the plate. I can almost forgive him for what he did to Bolton.......

almost

4 posted on 07/16/2008 5:35:22 AM PDT by arbee4bush (Our Airman Daughter KB4W--Hero, Patriot and the Love of her mom & dads life! RIP Tony Snow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
"...We can afford to wait no longer.".....

Oh DAMN!....We can't afford to wait no longer."
what! no proof-readers?.....(damn) spell-checker or Freudian slip?

5 posted on 07/16/2008 5:42:17 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Whatever his other faults, Voinovich has been strongly supportive of domestic energy development. He is particularly interested in assuring the continued and expanded use of nuclear energy as a means of energy independence through the use of an economical, reliable, and environmentally friendly energy source. For this, he deserves credit.
6 posted on 07/16/2008 5:42:31 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Voinovich actually responds to letters and emails? News to me - I have never gotten a reply from him, not even an automated one.

Beavercreek, OH


7 posted on 07/16/2008 5:43:09 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan
Yes, I actually received a 2 page response yesterday in the mail. I sent him an email detailing my concerns with the current energy situation.

I got an honest, real, not computer generated response. Stunned. Like you I have contacted him in the past and been ignored.

There are several pieces of energy legislation he is working on. One is posted above, the other has been stalled in committee. The other is the Gas and Petroleum Refiners Act S. 1503.

8 posted on 07/16/2008 5:50:15 AM PDT by EBH ( ... the riotousness of the crowd is always very close to madness. --Alculin c.735-804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EBH

This chokes me up.


9 posted on 07/16/2008 5:51:47 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

If recent studies show that only 1% of the oil spills come from drilling and over 30% of the spills occur in transporting the oil.It is enviromentally sound to do more drilling at home.


10 posted on 07/16/2008 6:06:47 AM PDT by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I can’t stand Voinovich. Barely even a RINO. But with this one issue, he’s locked my vote for him in the future.


11 posted on 07/16/2008 6:07:33 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

The man seems to have regained his senses, or is he up for re-election?


12 posted on 07/16/2008 6:16:05 AM PDT by Carley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye

LOL.


13 posted on 07/16/2008 6:17:42 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (CHEVY VOLT COUNTDOWN: V minus 104 Weeks. Waiting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Did Voinovich work up some tears when he released this?


14 posted on 07/16/2008 6:19:04 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Yes, I actually received a 2 page response yesterday in the mail. I sent him an email detailing my concerns with the current energy situation.
I got an honest, real, not computer generated response. Stunned. Like you I have contacted him in the past and been ignored.
There are several pieces of energy legislation he is working on. One is posted above, the other has been stalled in committee. The other is the Gas and Petroleum Refiners Act S. 1503.


I'm impressed. How about writing him back for me and tell him that M.K. Jessup of Free Republic says "F--- You Voinovich for stabbing an American patriot like John Bolton in the back"?

I was ready to move to Ohio just to vote against the sumb!tch.
15 posted on 07/16/2008 6:22:12 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: piytar
I can’t stand Voinovich. Barely even a RINO. But with this one issue, he’s locked my vote for him in the future.

Didn't take much to buy you off eh? LOL
16 posted on 07/16/2008 6:23:40 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; piytar
Real pocket book issues matter to voters. I wish the GOP would recongize this sooner.

I still can't get over Voinovich crying over John Bolton.

17 posted on 07/16/2008 6:35:48 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: EBH

There are so many issues that would sink the dems this fall. But if this is an issue that the gop can unify around, then fine. It alone will crush, destroy the liberals. Make drilling and exploring for oil the central them at the gop convention. Let the people know that it’s the democrats in congress hurting the middle class and working poor. McCain and the gop would come out of the convention with a 20 point bounce.


18 posted on 07/16/2008 6:47:51 AM PDT by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Real pocket book issues matter to voters. I wish the GOP would recognize this sooner.

Yeah, Mussolini made the trains run on time and Nazi Germany had full employment.
19 posted on 07/16/2008 6:50:36 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EBH

This falls into the ‘stopped clock is right twice a day’ bucket.

When it’s voting time for ‘Stupidest Senator’ Voinovich can only say, ‘Thank the Lord for Sen. Boxer.’


20 posted on 07/16/2008 7:17:30 AM PDT by G L Tirebiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I was either dreaming or heard this morning that the congressional ban on drilling ends on 09/30.


21 posted on 07/16/2008 7:21:21 AM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

If you think the energy issue is “not much,” then yeah, I guess.

There are only 4 issues that matter to me: Energy (which means drilling now), 2nd Amendment, illegal immigration, and national security. Abortion is close to being on the list, but without the others it is a moot issue because the nation will fall, as is SCOTUS appointments as far as they will impact the other 5.


22 posted on 07/16/2008 7:35:29 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
...Mussolini made the trains run on time and Nazi Germany had full employment....

and lest we forget....w/full prisons (filled w/their political foes.)

23 posted on 07/16/2008 8:09:49 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan

“I have never gotten a reply from him, not even an automated one.”

Me, either.


24 posted on 07/16/2008 8:15:06 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: piytar

We’re basically on the same page.

National security trumps all.

A rational and common sense approach to national security will encompass a sane energy policy as well, which roughly translated means we will drill the living Hell out of ANY acreage within the Continental United States that has oil, and we will build nuclear reactors to supplement our energy needs, and the environmental wackos can go pound sand.

And any national security policy MUST include the RKBA by the American citizen-soldier. An armed populace is the last line of defense against foreign AND domestic enemies no matter where they originate from, be it some Islamofascist sh*t hole somewhere in the Middle East, or in the inner sanctums of elected officials seeking to betray our Country.

And the only abortions that should be taking place are retroactive abortions for the traitors selling us out.

Illegal immigration? It ends the day after U.S. troops begin enforcing a “shoot to kill” order for anyone illegally crossing into the United States across our southern border with our undeclared enemy Mexico, or “shoot to stop” with our good neighbors to the north, i.e. Canada.

It’s our damn Nation, if someone wants to visit, come in the front door. Try to sneak in the back door, and you get a load o’ buckshot for your troubles.


25 posted on 07/16/2008 8:18:47 AM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
what! no proof-readers?.....(damn) spell-checker or Freudian slip?

Either of "We can afford to wait no longer" and "We can't afford to wait any longer" works. "We can't afford to wait no longer" would be double negation.

26 posted on 07/16/2008 8:19:44 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win (Let's drill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ardara
Not 30% from transporting oil but spills by users. Mainly inland petroleum use that eventually goes from rivers, lakes and oceans.

Drilling and Pipelines are still the smallest source.

How Does Oil Impact The Environment?
http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts/sources/non-renewable/oil.html#Environment

27 posted on 07/16/2008 8:26:00 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EBH; Smile-n-Win
"We can't afford to wait no longer" would be double negation....

LOL! *grin*

yes, yes, yes....the (proper :) Official English Grammar Police, have "scolded / chastised" me already!

28 posted on 07/16/2008 8:33:04 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EBH

A few tears he shed? You misrepresent the episode. He cried like a toddler. He flailed his arms, stomped his feet and wailed that the Bolton appointment would be the worst thing for the country that he loved that he was going to bequeath to his children and his grandchildren. If you’re going to tell it, tell it like it is.

Voinovich must be up for election this year. Following his comportment on the appointment of John Bolton, he cannot redeem himself in my eyes. He comported himself like a Democrap.


29 posted on 07/16/2008 9:01:03 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

You are in error. He said it correctly.


30 posted on 07/16/2008 9:02:49 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
yes, yes, yes....the (proper :) Official English Grammar Police, have "scolded / chastised" me already!

Ummmmmm.......would that be because you tried to be the grammar police and blew it?

31 posted on 07/16/2008 9:08:57 AM PDT by Pure Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pure Country; definitelynotaliberal; EBH
Umm.......would that be because you tried to be the grammar police and blew it?
*sigh* Guilty....(very short/very concise)...WHAT!...Me Worry?
32 posted on 07/16/2008 9:19:43 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

“I was either dreaming or heard this morning that the congressional ban on drilling ends on 09/30.”

I think that it does, and also that Congress has to renew it by then. Think GW can veto, too. Someone know for sure?


33 posted on 07/16/2008 9:23:05 AM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: piytar

I don’t think they could pass it again that close to an election, would be fun to watch the dems...


34 posted on 07/16/2008 9:46:53 AM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
yes, yes, yes....the (proper :) Official English Grammar Police, have "scolded / chastised" me already!

Never mind, as long as you support drilling, all this is really secondary! :-D

35 posted on 07/16/2008 12:29:48 PM PDT by Smile-n-Win (Let's drill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Earlier today I sent my anti-drill senator Rockefeller a little note politely asking why he has his head up his @#$%!


36 posted on 07/16/2008 12:33:11 PM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
anti-drill senator Rockefeller

That's an irony in itself. I wonder if he realizes that he would be an absolute nobody if it hadn't been for his ancestors--who made their fortune by ... DRILLING FOR OIL!

37 posted on 07/16/2008 1:22:39 PM PDT by Smile-n-Win (Let's drill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

I got an actual response from Sherrod Brown. It went like this:

“Let’s take care of the amnesty issue first, then we can decide how high to build the fence and how many border patrol agents we need.”

He didn’t reply to my reply...


38 posted on 07/16/2008 1:35:07 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: piytar

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080714/pl_nm/usa_energy_dc

It is in the middle of this article, the congressional ban on offshore drilling DOES EXPIRE on 09/30/2008... it could be extended........ lolol... that will be FUN to watch.


39 posted on 07/16/2008 6:41:41 PM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EBH; ADemocratNoMore; Akron Al; arbee4bush; Badeye; Bikers4Bush; BlindedByTruth; bonfire; ...

Ohio Ping!

To be added to the Ohio Ping List, please freepmail (works best) both TonyRo76 and LasVegasDave.


40 posted on 07/16/2008 6:45:00 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Now Obama's plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smile-n-Win
Never mind, as long as you support drilling, all this is really secondary!
...of course, I supported ALL drilling, mining, more nucl. / hydo. elec. plants, oil refineries/pipelines (proven energy developments) ever since the (Marxist) Eco-terrorists and their Congressional Lackeys started "*itching" about them.....in the '80s & Jimmah "Malaise" Carter.....FULL SPEED AHEAD!
41 posted on 07/16/2008 11:03:48 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Drilling and Pipelines are still the smallest source.

Yea, and NATURAL SEEPAGE is the highest. Choke on that enviro-wackos!
42 posted on 07/17/2008 5:15:31 AM PDT by Kerretarded (Ownership, Individuality, Freedom, Responsibility - The Backbone of Conservatism - falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

Save the environment.

Drill and relieve the pressure to cut down on the seepage.


43 posted on 07/17/2008 5:51:20 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
Umm.......would that be because you tried to be the grammar police and blew it? *sigh* Guilty....(very short/very concise)...WHAT!...Me Worry?

LOL!!! That is exactly why I taught math and NOT grammar. Can't keep all those crazy rules in my head! Course the kids would have loved having me for grammar......

44 posted on 07/17/2008 9:29:53 AM PDT by Pure Country
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan

Me neither.

Urbana, OH


45 posted on 07/17/2008 9:43:02 AM PDT by griswold3 (Al qaeda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pure Country
That is exactly why I taught math and NOT grammar....
its that the truth, that's why I stayed away from Engrish :) ...a studied, mainly math/physics/chemistry...history.
46 posted on 07/17/2008 1:15:22 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

What the hell are you talking about?


47 posted on 07/17/2008 5:51:07 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: piytar

He’ll prolly start crying about how he has worked this over andover in his mind .... so he got a right deicision for the first time in along time. He’s still a worthless stinking RINO that we would be better off without


48 posted on 07/17/2008 5:54:32 PM PDT by HiramQuick (work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HiramQuick

Have a hard time arguing with that...


49 posted on 07/17/2008 8:29:31 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

See #23, he gets it.


50 posted on 07/18/2008 2:00:21 AM PDT by mkjessup (Fred Phelps? It's HELL on the phone! It's for YOU! They say "COME ON DOWN!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson