Posted on 06/10/2008 4:20:49 PM PDT by John Semmens
The launching of a TV ad touting Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) for president, sparked outrage from the Obama campaign.
“At a time when the nation should be uniting, Senator McCain persists in stirring up opposition,” Obama complained. “I will concede that Senator McCain has served this nation honorably. We are grateful, but it’s time to move on to our new destiny. I invite the Senator to join our campaign for change.”
Others in the Obama camp were less gracious—attributing McCain’s continued opposition to an Obama presidency as “racism, pure and simple.” Supporters of Senator McCain’s bid for the office were warned. “We are taking note of these people,” said a source asking to remain anonymous. “If they don’t wise up, they shouldn’t be surprised when the hammer comes down on them next January. And turncoats like Lieberman—well, we will have a special treatment for them.”
(Excerpt) Read more at azconservative.org ...
The Onion?
LOL! I looked for your name before I even clicked on the link. ;*)
The scary thing is that just for a moment, I thought it was real!
susie
So if you oppose the racist Obama, then you’re a racist. Oh, and you will be dealt with.
That Obama is going to tear this country apart.
Guess I should have clicked on the link before posting LOL!
Wright, Pfleger, New Black Panthers, Hamas,Communist Party USA, your wife's attitude, your own statements Hussein...etc., etc.
No, you are the divisive one, and anyone with a lick of sense knows it.
And it is also clear why you are so divisive. You are the apex of the hate-America, domestic enemy in this country. His election as president would be the greatest coup any enemy has ever scored against this country and could easily lead to the worst, horrific disaster in our nation's history.
Even though a constitutional amendment aimed it prohibiting same-sex "marriage" is slated for a November vote, the California Supreme Court refused to delay the implementation of its decision invalidating a California law against the practice.
“The argument that a delay would avert confusion is without merit,” the court wrote. “The premise that a voter-approved amendment would restore a ban on gay marriage is invalid. There is no higher authority than this court. No election can change that. If the gay marriage ban amendment were to pass, we would just have to strike it down later. Therefore, since the vote will not change anything, there is no point in waiting for its outcome.”
Also from the article. This last paragraph captures a fundamental truth about what our judiciary has become. In my homestate of CO, that's basically the way the Court behaves.
“Others in the Obama camp were less gracious—attributing McCain’s continued opposition to an Obama presidency as “racism, pure and simple.” Supporters of Senator McCain’s bid for the office were warned. “We are taking note of these people,” said a source asking to remain anonymous. “If they don’t wise up, they shouldn’t be surprised when the hammer comes down on them next January. And turncoats like Lieberman—well, we will have a special treatment for them.”
Hussein ObamaMessiaHamas is a whiner and his PC staff says everytime someone uses Hussein ObamaMessiaHamas’s exact words or documented statments, “That is devisive and racists.
Hussein ObamaMessiaHamas is a whiney thin skinned dork.
I call Obama’s campaign a piece of S**t!!!
Has he looked in a mirror.......
This man can’t pull that nonsense and get away with it. What’s more divisive than him pandering to the leftist whackos in the Democratic Party?
“our campaign for change.”
Change to what? Change to what, Mr. Candidate?
Chapter One:
Page one!
Accuse your opponent of doing/being what you are guilty of.
The man's insane. That's how our system works.
Sounds like Obama is willing to stir up a violent revolutionary movement if necessary.
Just as a reminder - the entire article is SATIRE. However, good satire is when it is so close to the mark that it is hard to tell the difference from it and the actual statements. Notice I said “actual statement” and not “truth”. I think the satire is closer to the truth. Especially with the court’s “statement” that you refer to.
The article is satire. However, it does give cred to my bumper sticker:
Obama/McCain ‘08
One Nation, Unity for All
(also satire)
Suggested McCain campaign slogan: “Just say NO to B.O.”.
HEY! That's my tag line - well the last part.
Obambi’s entire campaign theme is: If you don’t vote for me, you’re a racist!
Calling McCain divisive is like calling Mr. Rogers divisive. Does not compute.
Sounded real to me.. those first few sentences. The article is clearly marked satirical, I see (now).
Thanks.
Nope. I got that. But the satire was terrific in that it captured the essence of judicial attitudes about us ignerint folks who just have to learn to live under the wisdom of their decrees.
I live where we have lots of referendums that can be put on the ballot and voted on. After the state court and/or the Governor get done with them they are pretty much worthless if they pass.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.