Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "fix" (Cindy Sheehan suspects president will suspend elections, endorses Ron Paul)
Cindy Sheehan for Congress Blog ^ | October 22, 2007 | Cindy Sheehan

Posted on 11/25/2007 7:02:46 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To show the mindset of our enemies and illustrate how far off the chart Ron Paul is.

Get real. Sheehan mentions Paul in a passing reference, and you call that an endorsement? Where does she explicitly endorse Dr. Paul?

Do you realize how disingenuous you've gotten? Please take me off your stupid Fred PING list.

21 posted on 11/25/2007 8:35:12 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Simply amazing to watch the last two neurons of her mind wave goodbye to each other.
22 posted on 11/25/2007 8:38:16 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; Politicalmom
"Please take me off your stupid Fred PING list.",P> I don't run the "stupid Fred PING list" that would be politicalmom....
23 posted on 11/25/2007 8:39:37 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That would be difficult since he isn’t even ON the FRed ping list.


24 posted on 11/25/2007 8:48:22 AM PST by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I was wondering if she is spending a lot of her time on her campaign to run against Pelosi. Doesn’t she have to establish residency?


25 posted on 11/25/2007 8:49:22 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
"That would be difficult since he isn’t even ON the FRed ping list."

He's a Paulestinian, so you probably have him on some sort of double-secret, hidden agenda, Council on Foreign Relations/Bilderburger type Fred PING list that even you and I are not privy to...

26 posted on 11/25/2007 8:52:00 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: avacado

LOL!


27 posted on 11/25/2007 9:04:36 AM PST by MonicaG (In hoc signo vinces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

the title of this is incorrect, she did not ‘endorse’ ron paul


28 posted on 11/25/2007 9:09:54 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Sheehan will probably endorse Paul more explicitly soon. Sheehan and “libertarian” writer Lew Rockwell were or are dating and Rockwell is a huge Paulestinian.

Plus, when it comes to foreign policy there is no difference between Sheehan and Paul.


29 posted on 11/25/2007 9:16:38 AM PST by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
it sounds eerily like the right-wing blogosphere fears that Clinton would use Y2K or some other problem as an excuse to suspend the 2000 elections and retain power

And I recall reading the same thing on Fidonet and BBSs in the 80s that Reagan was going to do the same. Thereafter of course, it was Bush I. It's always "Suspend the constitution and declare himself leader".

Bunk then, bunk now.

30 posted on 11/25/2007 9:24:03 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wow, she attacks Bush, supports Iran, and even implicitly attacks FDR.

I sense a new career for this woman in the John Birch Society!

31 posted on 11/25/2007 10:16:58 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (VeYisra'el 'ahav 'et-Yosef mikkol-banayv ki-ven-zequnim hu' lo; ve`asah lo ketonet passim.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Maybe the War Room can explain the difference between Shehag’s and Kook Paul’s view on the war?? Paul and Cindy sittin in a tree...
Paul/Shehan ‘08

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


32 posted on 11/25/2007 10:22:28 AM PST by bray (Let's Bring Christ Back to Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
That would be difficult since he isn’t even ON the FRed ping list.

Is there even one at all, or does it consist of senior citizens doozing off at one of Fred's speeches.

33 posted on 11/25/2007 10:26:51 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Sheehan will probably endorse Paul more explicitly soon

There's no "endorsement" here, lay off the Jack Daniels.

34 posted on 11/25/2007 10:28:15 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Her endorsement of him is inevitable IMO.

And criticizing every single Republican running for President except Paul is an implicit endorsement.


35 posted on 11/25/2007 12:00:11 PM PST by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cindy endorses Ron Paul then Libertarians are liberals. This is the final proof.
36 posted on 11/25/2007 12:05:50 PM PST by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gate2wire

Maybe she and Hillary talk with Eleanor. Or maybe the ‘Mad Woman of ... (fill in the blank)’.


37 posted on 11/25/2007 1:18:55 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Plus, when it comes to foreign policy there is no difference between Sheehan and Paul.

I disagee:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1906994/posts?page=237#237
38 posted on 11/25/2007 6:35:33 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

I agree that the anti-war left and anti-war right have differing motives for opposing the War on Terror, but the end result is the same: cutting-and-running in Iraq and surrender.

It doesn’t matter if it’s done in the name of anti-Americanism (Sheehan) or noninterventionism (Paul).

This is why Kucinich is able to entertain the thought of a Paul/Kucinich ticket: they have the same goals albeit for different reasons.


39 posted on 11/25/2007 6:53:11 PM PST by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

It’s funny, I have run across a few Paul supporters who speak highly of Kucinich. It is stange because they are complete opposites. I think these folks are either ignorant (supporting radical change just for the sake of radical change) or they are truthers. Either or, they have no real foundation in the limited government roots, which the vast majority of Paul supporters subscribe to.


40 posted on 11/25/2007 7:03:16 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson