Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peak Curiosity (peak oil output cult)
Tech Central Station ^ | 2 December 2005 | Vaclav Smil

Posted on 12/04/2005 6:19:51 PM PST by Stultis

Predicting the end of oil era has been a venerable (albeit fruitless) pseudo-intellectual pursuit for most of the 20th century. This Nostradamian pastime regained new vigor during the late 1990s when (mostly retired geologists) Colin Campbell, Jean Laherrère, L.F. Ivanhoe, Richard Duncan and Kenneth Deffeyes -- and their groupies gathered under the WWW umbrellas of peakoil.net, peakoil.com, peakoil.org and hubbertpeak.com --- flooded the media with catastrophist tales of imminent peak of the global oil production to be followed by a precipitous decline of oil availability resulting in the demise of modern civilization. As self-appointed prophets are want to do, these wholesalers of fear have not been cautious when outlining the consequences. In Ivanhoe's rendering   "the inevitable doomsday" will be followed by "economic implosion" that will make "many of the world's developed societies look more like today's Russia than the US." In Duncan's telling there is massive unemployment, breadlines, widespread homelessness and a catastrophic end of industrial civilization.

Kenneth Deffeyes, an experienced petroleum geologist and a former professor at Princeton University, has been the most puzzling member of the peak oil cult. As a scientist he must know that the real world is permeated by uncertainties, that complex realities should not be reduced to simplistic slogans aimed to gain media attention, and that (as even a brief retrospective will demonstrate) making precise point predictions is a futile endeavor. Yet he set all of this aside and proceeded to write about the peak of global oil production in a way that leaves no room for any doubt ("no initiative put in place starting today can have a substantial effect on the peak production year"), that portrays the world's energy use merely as a matter of supply (utterly ignoring demand) and, most incredibly, he went farther than any of his confrères by predicting not just the year but the very day when the world's oil output was to peak.

 

On January 14, 2004 he wrote (albeit admitting that "it is a bit silly") that

 

"we can now pick a day to celebrate passing the top of the mathematically smooth Hubbert curve: Nov 24, 2005. It falls right smack dab on top of Thanksgiving Day 2005. It sounds a little sick to observe a gloomy day, but in San Francisco they still observe April 18 as the anniversary of the 1906 earthquake."

 

On June 5, 2004 he confirmed that "I'm still standing by my prediction that the smoothed world production curve will peak on Thanksgiving Day, 2005." The day came and went -- so what is the verdict? In the strictest sense Deffeyes's proposition is not provable by consulting any statistics: oil producing countries do not report their extraction on a daily basis. And even if it worked in terms of a mathematically smooth curve we would have to wait for many months to complete such a derivation.

 

But there is no need for waiting. Amidst the ocean of uncertainties concerning the future of global oil production there are (as Rumsfeld, correctly, would have it) two great known unknowns: we do not know with any satisfactory confidence the ultimate amount of oil that we will be able to extract from the Earth's crust; and we do not know the eventual extent of market reaction to substantial price shifts (a plain way of saying that the elasticity of crude oil's consumption is an elusive variable). And because we do not know either the eventual maximum of potential (resource-limited) extraction or the actual level of (market-driven) production we cannot know with any readily quantifiable certainty the year (forget the day) when the global oil output will peak.

 

As far as resources go, peak-of-oil catastrophists believe that there is virtually nothing left to be discovered while both the theoretical understanding of sedimentary basin geology and the fact that large parts of the crust (including some regions in the Middle East, most of West Africa and huge chunks of Siberia) have yet to be explored with intensity comparable to that of the North American drilling point to further substantial discoveries. Acting on this, both national and multinational oil companies are now engaged in extensive drilling aimed at adding millions of barrels of new capacity in the coming years.

 

As for the market reaction, the response, eventually, does come. After OPEC nearly quintupled its oil price in 1973 the global oil consumption declined by merely 1.5% in 1974 and by 1976 it was nearly 4% above the 1973 level. Oil use may have been inelastic to the initial quintupling but it surely responded to an additional near-trebling that took place between 1978 and 1981: by 1983 the world's oil consumption fell by 11%.

 

The same forces have been at work recently. The day before the Thanksgiving the price per barrel went down by 50 cents, during the preceding month it declined by about 8% and since August it fell by about 17%; it fell again the day after Thanksgiving when it stood, in inflation-adjusted terms, more than 20% below the historic high reached in the spring of 1981. None of this indicates a market spooked by the prospect of global extraction never surpassing the Thanksgiving rate! Headlines and attention grabbing have been always about new bad news, about caricaturing complexities and about reducing the message to the lowest understandable denominator. But scientists should leave this "information" niche to the National Enquirer or to Dr. Phil.

 

Undoubtedly, there is a finite amount of oil in the Earth's crust, but even if we were to know it to the last drop we could not predict how much of it we will eventually extract (much of it will be simply too expensive to get out, or too unappealing compared to other choices). Undoubtedly, there is continuing (and relatively slowly increasing) oil demand in affluent economies and there is rising demand in China and India, but we do not know how fast the global use will grow and at what levels it will start eventually leveling off because that rate is determined not only by the volume of recoverable oil but also by the fuel's price and by the cleverness and rapidity of our technical advances. Inevitably, sometime in the future global extraction of liquid oil will start declining but we will not be able to pinpoint that event and it may not be of much interest anyway.

 

The story of the modern world is, most fundamentally, one of continuous energy transitions as the leading fuel changed from wood to coal and then from coal to oil. But oil never dominated as much as coal did because of the concurrent diversification into natural gas and into hydro and nuclear electricity. These, and other sources, await further exploitation: there is no reason to believe that we cannot eventually move past the oil era. Difficulties of this transition should not be discounted but they will be the best stimulants of our inventiveness and of our ability to cope with new challenges.

 

Vaclav Smil is in the Faculty of Environment at the University of Manitoba, Canada. His latest book is Creating the 20th Century; his latest energy book is Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties. A wide-ranging examination of the peak oil phenomenon will appear in Peak Oil Forum (Aleklett, Cavaney, Flavin, Kaufman, Smil) in January-February issue of World Watch.



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; oilproduction; peakoil

1 posted on 12/04/2005 6:19:52 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Speculation surrounds oil peak ^
  Posted by M. Espinola
On News/Activism ^ 11/25/2005 9:52:35 PM CST · 12 replies · 418+ views


(The Washington Times - Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News via COMTEX) ^ | November 25th, 2005 | By Patrice Hill
Thanksgiving marked the day that some analysts thought global oil production would have reached its peak, ushering in a new era of fuel shortages. These petro-pessimists were using the same formula as the one that accurately predicted the apex of U.S. oil production in 1970. Matthew Simmons, author of "Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy," is one of them. He thinks Saudi Arabia has pumped much of its usable reserves and will start to experience production declines. Even analysts who are more optimistic warn that chronically high prices and occasional supply crunches...

2 posted on 12/04/2005 6:22:31 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Testimony of James Schlesinger (Peak Oil) ^
  Posted by wotan
On News/Activism ^ 11/20/2005 1:30:12 PM CST · 10 replies · 354+ views


11/16/05 | James Schlesinger
STATEMENT OF JAMES SCHLESINGER BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE 16 NOVEMBER 2005 Mr. Chairman, Members of the Committee: I thank the Committee for this opportunity to discuss the quest for energy security, the implications of our heavy dependence on imported oil, the rise in oil prices, and their manifold political an economic repercussions for our nation. In so many ways, the use of oil as our primary energy source turns out to be a two-edged sword. Given that dependence, the ramifications are too numerous to discuss in detail. Given the necessary limitations on time, I must...
 

Why High IQ Fails Us, Freakenomics of Peak Oil, and Horse Breeding, Manhattan Style.  ^
  Posted by dennisw
On News/Activism ^ 09/07/2005 8:02:59 AM CDT · 15 replies · 567+ views


postcarbon.org ^ | katrina | Dmitry Podborits
I find myself in a very strange situation. Everywhere I look I see very smart people expressing confident opinions about some future developments of various large and small-scale financial and economic phenomena. One might assume that these opinions should somehow filter into various decision making processes for for various kinds of analytical, strategic and tactical thinking. Therefore, one might hope that the opinions expressed by the smartest people with the most confidence are the most informed, balanced and rational. However, often I observe the opposite trend: the smarter the people are, the less they are interested in the world around...
 

Houston Peak Oil Mini Conference ^
  Posted by NYorkerInHouston
On News/Activism ^ 07/06/2005 2:14:44 PM CDT · 11 replies · 304+ views


July 6, 2005 | NYorkerInHouston
For those that are interesed there will be a conference on peak oil held in Houston on Saturday, July 9, 2005. It will take place from 1-5:30 p.m at the First Unitarian Universalist Church 5200 Fannin Street @ Southmore, Houston, Texas 77004
 

Legendary Oil Magnate Calls It, Peak Oil is Here  ^
  Posted by ex-Texan
On News/Activism ^ 06/14/2005 4:31:44 AM CDT · 203 replies · 4,139+ views


PeakOil.net ^ | 5/5/2005 | EV World
Boone Pickens Warns of Petroleum Production PeakLegendary Oklahoma energy magnate, T. Boone Pickens will be 77 years old this month, and maybe because of that, he feels free to speak what's on his mind; and he did to an audience of alternative fuel advocates in Palm Springs today. Addressing the 11th National Clean Cities conference, hosted by the former mayor of Palm Springs and introduced by former U.S. Energy Secretary John Herrington (1984-1989), Boone, as his friends refer to him, was candid in his views of wind energy, nuclear power, natural gas, and in particular petroleum. While he acknowledges wind...
 

Congressman Bartlett to give 2nd speech on peak oil tonight ^
  Posted by NYorkerInHouston
On News/Activism ^ 04/19/2005 9:11:36 AM CDT · 6 replies · 230+ views


Congressman Roscoe Bartlett's website ^ | April 19, 2005 | NYorkerInHouston
Congressman Bartlett (R-MD) is scheduled to give his 2nd special order speech on peak oil tonight. It will be carried on C-Span and may start anywhere from 8pm to 9:30pm EST. Set your VCRs http://www.energybulletin.net http://www.bartlett.house.gov
 

The Long Emergency [Peak Oil] ^
  Posted by Momaw Nadon
On News/Activism ^ 03/28/2005 6:49:00 AM CST · 54 replies · 1,445+ views


Rolling Stone ^ | Thursday, March 24, 2005 | JAMES HOWARD KUNSTLER
What's going to happen as we start running out of cheap gas to guzzle? A few weeks ago, the price of oil ratcheted above fifty-five dollars a barrel, which is about twenty dollars a barrel more than a year ago. The next day, the oil story was buried on page six of the New York Times business section. Apparently, the price of oil is not considered significant news, even when it goes up five bucks a barrel in the span of ten days. That same day, the stock market shot up more than a hundred points because, CNN said, government...
 

Peak Oil: Life after the oil crash ^
  Posted by jaime1959
On News/Activism ^ 03/14/2005 9:16:08 PM CST · 196 replies · 3,511+ views


lifeaftertheoilcrash.net ^ | 2/25/05 | Matt Savinar
Dear Reader, Civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory society. Rather, it is the scientific conclusion of the best paid, most widely-respected geologists, physicists, and investment bankers in the world. These are rational, professional, conservative individuals who are absolutely terrified by a phenomenon known as global “Peak Oil.” "Are We 'Running Out'? I Thought There Was 40 Years of the Stuff Left" Oil will not just "run out" because all oil production follows a bell curve. This is true...
 

DUmmie FUnnies 09-29-04 AM Edition (Peak Oil and the Bush World Reich) ^
  Posted by PJ-Comix
On Bloggers & Personal ^ 09/29/2004 6:52:20 AM CDT · 19 replies · 338+ views


Various DUmmies and Assorted MOrons | September 29, 2004 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix
In today’s morning edition of the DUmmie FUnnies, the DUmmies proudly wear their tinfoil hats and come up with a conspiracy about how “peak oil” is tied into a Bush World Reich. The conspiracies here fly faster than a Michael Rivero wet dream. So put on your own tinfoil hats so you can tune in to the DUmmie conspiracy frequency presented here in this edition of the DUmmie Funnies. As usual, the comments of your humble correspondent (wearing his own tinfoil hat), are in the [brackets]: It's all beginning to make perfect sense. [Uh-Oh! When you hear a DUmmie say...
 

Peak Oil Production, necessary conservation, and alternative necessary energy production sources ^
  Posted by combat_boots
On General/Chat ^ 06/18/2004 7:28:15 PM CDT · 26 replies · 227+ views


Various
Please start reading up on oil field reserve production and projections and something called Peak Oil production. We must get ahead of this curve on energy conservation and various alternatives. Failure to do so will be at our peril. We do already know this. I am an ANWAR conservation person, and love all things Alaska. I don't know an easy way around this one, and do not necessarily support drilling there. I do not have any systemic answers to this, but think better researchers than I can help move the discussion and the solutions forward, before this is done FOR...
 

Is Peak Oil reality? What do you think? ^
  Posted by jimknopf
On News/Activism ^ 06/17/2004 9:00:39 AM CDT · 48 replies · 403+ views


If it's for real, we have ~5 years before the end. If it's not, we have ~30 unless our "need" for it increases, in which case it's more like 20 before the inevitable destroys us. If you are sure peak oil is a phony scare tactics, please tell us WHY. A bunch of "No, it's not real" posts with no substance behind it will NOT be considered. I've seen lots of web sites clearly suggesting peak oil is possible. Here are the very official figures, and my static calculation: Source: Energy Information AdministrationHere is an Excel-sheet that lists the world...
 

What are your thoughts on Peak Oil? ^
  Posted by agooga
On General/Chat ^ 02/26/2004 11:42:53 PM CST · 6 replies · 63+ views


This topic has probably been covered before-- apologies. I've been hearing and reading more and more on the subject of Peak Oil. Some are predicting global depression to mass extinction. My BS detector is buzzing, but my practical side is saying "it's possible." Where do you stand? Is Peak Oil for real or another Y2K?

3 posted on 12/04/2005 6:24:06 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

The new Blue OILster Cult?

..needs more cowbell.


4 posted on 12/04/2005 6:24:31 PM PST by xcamel (a system poltergeist stole it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

The leftists use the peak oil theories as their proof. It's hard to believe truths printed in Rolling Stone.


5 posted on 12/04/2005 6:25:30 PM PST by satchmodog9 ( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson