Posted on 09/15/2012 7:38:28 AM PDT by rustyweiss74
At first blush, this might seem like a gratuitous post. A post designed to lure in readers with its over the top rhetoric and a forced analysis of a ridiculous and fictitious scenario. A sensationalizing of the campaign battle by literally determining who could win a knock down, drag 'em out fight.
And you'd be right. (We need readers)
But it's also a response to a recent poll conducted by the Yahoo!/Esquire Langer group in which, for some reason they decided to ask likely voters which of the two candidates would win in a fistfight.
It wasn't even a close contest.
Well we're here to tell you exactly why you should be betting on the underdog in this fight. Romney would take Obama in a schoolyard brawl in a New York minute.
Here's the top five reasons why...
(Excerpt) Read more at menrec.com ...
I say, “Romney VS Obama” - Ringside, Las Vegas, pay-to-view (to benefit the National Debt). Winner takes all.
Erkel would beat Obama in a fist fight, probably in a contest of intelligence also.
Mitt Romney, do not underestemate him. He can take Obama out with a direct plan in the debates. Watch and listen.
My wife could beat the marxist in a fist fight. On the badass POTUS scale....with Andrew Jackson as a 100. Obama would be about a 3. With next to last being James Madison at about a 40.
#6 - He’s not a fagbag girlyman.
#7 - He’s not a blogpimp.
Is there ANY doubt??
As soon as I read the headline, THAT was the pic thatcame to mind.
What an idea!
I’d bet the farm Mrs. Romney could whoop the metrosexual magic negros punk ass in a fair fight.
Yes. Quite a contrast, hmm?
http://singletrack.competitor.com/2011/04/news/ex-prez-bush-rips-it-up-with-veterans_15617
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.